Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

Ronalds.Kenins41

Members
  • Posts

    4,675
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Ronalds.Kenins41

  1. Yeah guess it's good both ways. NJ had the 3-2 series lead and game 6 went to OT; anyone's game. NJ wins game 6 goes to the finals. Was a pretty close series though but ultimately NJ was just a bit better.
  2. Agree'd. But didn't the other poster say NJ made cause they were losing lots of money at the time. Seriously though some of the things said in this thread are insane while some makes sense.
  3. Yup will take a miracle for them to win against Boston. That being said they are a confident group right now and if (I mean when) they lose against Boston they will have a record of 7-4-1 in their last 12 games and they have surprised many teams with their unexpected good play. Dubynk knows that Bryz played lights out before his injury so he is trying really hard to keep his role which isn't exactly good news for us as we struggled to score two goals against Hurricanes (They scored 5 against them). A loss would be unlikely but wouldn't surprise me either is what I am saying.
  4. This reminds me when in Game 6 the Canucks had scored to start the third period and Hansen hit the post and thought he scored and was celebrating. The score was 4-1 Boston but the Canucks were controlling the game and were creating quality chances it looked like they had could have a comeback despite the score. Then shortly after Boston found themselves on a 5 on 3 which they ended up scoring on. After that the Canucks basically gave up. That was the first time in the series I thought the game was being managed(not as a conspiracy for the result as the score was 4-1 but to allow no momentum to be gained). The Canuck's probably would have lost the game but the calls meant there was no chance for the Canucks to even keep the momentum, no chance to comeback. There are many other examples in the LA series and SJ of this everyone probably knows about but it shows how the timing of penalties is important. I am not a conspiracy theorist. I certainly don't think the league is out to get us and wants the worst for us and that there is a huge scheme going on that the players, coaches and media are hiding. That stuff is insanity to me and I don't buy it. But you can't say that the refs didn't have any impact in the series in LA, SJ and Boston. Just like another poster says the league kind doesn't go against the flow and tries to go with it if it brings financial benefits.
  5. Oilers are 7-3-1 in their last 11 games and just scored 5 goals on a team we struggled to score two goals on. They scored 8 goals on team with the least GA in the league and that clogs up the neutral zone. Don't under estimate them. 3-1 Oilers Hall Hemsky Hopkins Higgins
  6. But MG called out the officiating, so did Murray, so did Ovi. When MG did it he got to the finals before he felt the consequences . Murray did it in the finals and got totally beaten in the series after. Ovi hasn't had any consequences as of yet cause he is a player that sells the game.
  7. This is not conspiracy talk this is playoff talk . Just because you don't understand what I am saying doesn't make you right.
  8. You sure got the facts straight. Convenient how the seeding in the conference matters for Oilers/Hurricanes and Calgary/Tampa and doesn't matter for LA. Also LA conveniently gets Richards and Carter + coaching change wins cup (Holmgren previously said he would build around them they are the future). Anaheim gets Neider and Pronger wins cup. First of all it's improbable for such trades to happen second the team magically gels, gets easy competition and wins??? NJ makes no sense contradicts your la one. Chicago drafts toews + kane goes to conference final in second year then wins cup in third, how are the oilers doing following their recipe; they haven't even made the playoffs yet that's how it really works. Of course your going to say Chicago has a good gm and coach. No stop button in Toronto to check video in 04 calgary finals ? .Let me say what you said If you're going to put a post up like this, put down actual facts. You lied and lied some more to everyone reading your post.
  9. K now your just spewing crap about conspiracy theories and Vancouver there are many other threads to talk about that stuff. We are talking about some serious stuff here.
  10. Well if you watched game 7 you would notice on every two on one that every player took the puck straight to Thomas instead of passing it and getting a goal like the Torres goal in game 1 and the Lapierre goal in Boston. Heck even the sedins weren't passing on the two on one's. If you know something is working why not do it again . http://canucks.nhl.c...p?id=2010030417 0:26 sec's if Henrik passes empty net goal for Burrows. Takes it to the net no pass(yes this is Henrik I am talking about) 2:40 Burrows to bieksa empty net goal for Bieksa. Takes shot even though there is nothing to shoot it 4:36 Daniel to Hansen empty net goal for Hansen. Yes once again I am talking about another sedin who failed to make a pass for a guy in perfect position something they never pass up on. Sounds like the Sedin's weren't themselves that game neither was burrows in the most important game of their lives. gimme a break.
  11. Strange thing was he was part of the NBA and third in command before he came to the NHL according to this video.
  12. Why did they get rid of the old commissioner was there some scandal or something?
  13. Yup stopped in Vancouver too like 20 minutes ago.
×
×
  • Create New...