Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

The Official Transit Thread


nitronuts

Recommended Posts

I love how the argument is now about the movement of goods. :rolleyes:

Are you arguing all of the road projects he listed (and others) are all with the intention of moving goods?

Everything's black and white with you isn't it? Both people and goods need to move but yes goods are a major reason and influence for a lot of these projects.

I seem to remember a few years ago that the Premier met with leaders of Asia and had to promise them expansion of infrastructure to move goods for their support to send them via our ports as opposed to through say American ports. There's more at work here than you're usual narrow field of view inane.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everything's black and white with you isn't it? Both people and goods need to move but yes goods are a major reason and influence for a lot of these projects.

I seem to remember a few years ago that the Premier met with leaders of Asia and had to promise them expansion of infrastructure to move goods for their support to send them via our ports as opposed to through say American ports. There's more at work here than you're usual narrow field of view inane.

No, everything is extremely grey--if you've read anything I've written you'd know that. I was making a point that his statement about this being about goods movement laughable exactly because it is so complex.

My narrow view :lol::lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But he's not wrong. In a lot of very meaningful ways it is about goods movement.

No, he's not 'wrong'. But to simplify the point of that article, and to have what's his face mock it all with his magic comments...I mean you guys just don't get it...I don't know why I bother....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

doesn't really come through on the internet, no. plus it was very fitting with your character so... if it quacks like a duck....

I managed to gather enough wits together to realize "what's his face" was being sarcastic.

Edited by J.R.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, he's not 'wrong'. But to simplify the point of that article, and to have what's his face mock it all with his magic comments...I mean you guys just don't get it...I don't know why I bother....

This coming from the guy who over simplifies damn near everything to an "us vs them" mentality.

Edited by J.R.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

really? "magic" doesn't come through as tongue-in-cheek on the internet? Or is my sarcasm detector broken?

Inane does strike me as this lost soul wandering our world wondering why it's not a Disney-like utopia of singing birds helping the poor fold laundry in their quaint urban aprtment mdae of lolli's and gumdrops riding around on public transit powered my the magic of "imagineering" :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right, well the above collection of posts again illustrates you've never actually read what i write, or at least understood it, so again, i won't bother.

Many things can be said about me but to claim I see the world in black and white is stunningly contrary to everything I've ever posted on here, it makes we wonder if you are truly able to comprehend written English.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right, well the above collection of posts again illustrates you've never actually read what i write, or at least understood it, so again, i won't bother.

Many things can be said about me but to claim I see the world in black and white is stunningly contrary to everything I've ever posted on here, it makes we wonder if you are truly able to comprehend written English.

Or maybe, being that you seem to generally hit a wall of opposition with most of your posts here, it's in fact you that is the problem and you have a poor grasp on your ability to communicate your true and surely noble thoughts to the rest of us?

Edited by J.R.
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Or maybe being that you seem to generally hit a wall of opposition with most of your posts here it's in fact you that is the problem and you have a poor grasp on your ability to communicate your true and surely noble thoughts to the rest of us.

Could be, although this whole discussion arose from an article I linked and did not write myself. So, perhaps I'll try using smaller words and shorter sentences?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could be, although this whole discussion arose from an article I linked and did not write myself. So, perhaps I'll try using smaller words and shorter sentences?

I won't speak for the others but I have no problems reading long words or sentences. Perhaps it more than that...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I won't speak for the others but I have no problems reading long words or sentences. Perhaps it more than that...

Well then how about we address the actual topic which was the article I linked to...hmmmm?

What is your take on it? Perhaps you can respond with more than a one liner as azhdeen did?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could be, although this whole discussion arose from an article I linked and did not write myself. So, perhaps I'll try using smaller words and shorter sentences?

Maybe I should have worded my thoughts better.....

But your views and his seem to go hand in hand from what I've read on here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...