Captain Bob Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 But I think it was the playclock, not the game clock they were talking about. Which would make sense as to why the play was blown down after the fact. If it was the game clock, they would've straightened it out beforehand, but it's really unusual for the playclock not to reset. I believe that's what created the confusion. Correct me if I'm wrong (I may be). And damn it if I don't want to know!! There was 1:05 before the BC timeout, the play went on when it should have been a t.o, and the clock ran anyways. The clock ran from 1:05 to 1:00 and was never reset. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-DLC- Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 There was 1:05 before the BC timeout, the play went on when it should have been a t.o, and the clock ran anyways. The clock ran from 1:05 to 1:00 and was never reset. On Global news they said the playclock. So they got that wrong? Because I always think of the playclock as the 20 second clock to get the play off. (and how come you didn't tell me this in the pm?) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-DLC- Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 Am I being Punk'd? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheJoker19 Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 Great win today! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Bob Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 Am I being Punk'd? Your 2-5 Lions beat those stupid 7-1 frenchies, you should be happy. (before I get a warning for this, I'm from Montreal and I speak french, so I'm allowed to use that term) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-DLC- Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 Your 2-5 Lions beat those stupid 7-1 frenchies, you should be happy. (before I get a warning for this, I'm from Montreal and I speak french, so I'm allowed to use that term) But did Geroy miss me? He usually comes over to my section and gives me a smile. We always beat those Frenchies. Remember? It's just how it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Bob Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 But did Geroy miss me? He usually comes over to my section and gives me a smile. We always beat those Frenchies. Remember? It's just how it is. Racist... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hordichuk Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 Hey am french too lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-DLC- Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 Racist... Actually, Burr and Lu are alright by me. Oh yeah, and I am happy. wooooooooo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Bob Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 On the skytrain ride home, I heard some guy saying he was sitting pretty close to Alex Burrows, Shane O'Brien and Darcy Hordichuk. He mentioned he got pictures with them too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Bob Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 How come the blocked BC field goal wasn't a live ball? Couldn't BC jump on it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canucks_fo_life Posted September 5, 2009 Author Share Posted September 5, 2009 Me, my bro, and my buddy got kicked our for yelling at an Als fan in section 221 in 1st quarter...total joke, the dude provoked us Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-DLC- Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 How come the blocked BC field goal wasn't a live ball? Couldn't BC jump on it? If a blocked field goal is in or behind the neutral zone, it's treated like a fumble and can be advanced by either team. Beyond the neutral zone, a blocked kick is treated like a punt or missed field goal and can be advanced only by the defense, unless a defensive player fumbles the ball, after which an offensive player can advance it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hordichuk Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 If a blocked field goal is in or behind the neutral zone, it's treated like a fumble and can be advanced by either team. Beyond the neutral zone, a blocked kick is treated like a punt or missed field goal and can be advanced only by the defense, unless a defensive player fumbles the ball, after which an offensive player can advance it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-DLC- Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 Why was there no no-yards call on the play then? I don't think it applied....they seemed to back off and give him the space from what I can recall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Bob Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 Why was there no no-yards call on the play then? There was, but Montreal got a penalty on the play too, so they canceled out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-DLC- Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 There was, but Montreal got a penalty on the play too, so they canceled out. Are you sure? I didn't think that was on the blocked field goal. Maybe I should watch the replay (my phone rang several times and I was preoccupied for a bit). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hordichuk Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 Geez deb, family emergency? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-DLC- Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 Geez deb, family emergency? Actually, two at the same time. And I still managed to (half) watch the game, but apparently not very well. Oh yeah, there was an objectionable conduct call on Cox (it was kind of lame - just threw the ball back). But I don't remember a no yards call. Oh God, I better sleep this one off and try next time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silverpig Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 But how it's being reported is that it was a non play because the refs blew it dead to add time on the clock. At least per the CFL recap. So according to the news - the flag, apparently was to signify "no play" because the play clock hadn't been set. Makes sense but who the hell dropped that ball? Als should be infuriated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.