Possum Posted September 21, 2010 Share Posted September 21, 2010 Thanks for pinning Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Vintage Canuck- Posted February 10, 2011 Share Posted February 10, 2011 How come "NHLSourcesSay" is an Invalid Source. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Strome Posted February 10, 2011 Share Posted February 10, 2011 How come "NHLSourcesSay" is an Invalid Source. Because they're as bad as Eklund. Has cdc banned Ek yet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b3. Posted February 11, 2011 Author Share Posted February 11, 2011 How come "NHLSourcesSay" is an Invalid Source. It's been well documented in this thread. Summarized version: Reposts other peoples things as his own. A user on here runs it; but accidentally proved it when he posted a tweet here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dazzle Posted February 11, 2011 Share Posted February 11, 2011 Eklund should be nominated soon as being an invalid source. He has sources, but his failure lately to call the numerous trades that took place these past few days indicates that he does not have enough sources to justify paying him money. His rumors very rarely pan out. And unless he's purposefully avoiding the rumors that eventually lead to trades, he is not very reliable as a source whatsoever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Strome Posted February 11, 2011 Share Posted February 11, 2011 Eklund should be nominated soon as being an invalid source. He has sources, but his failure lately to call the numerous trades that took place these past few days indicates that he does not have enough sources to justify paying him money. His rumors very rarely pan out. And unless he's purposefully avoiding the rumors that eventually lead to trades, he is not very reliable as a source whatsoever. Yes he should. The Mods on cdc contradict themselves so badly when defending him too. The best 2 I've heard so far are: 1)He has well respected/connected writers on his site. Who? Andy Strikland, lol@him. 2)He is just reporting what he hears, don't you know what a rumour is? Oh o.k then why are any sites/writers banned mods? don't you know what a rumour is? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Intoewsables Posted February 14, 2011 Share Posted February 14, 2011 Yes he should. The Mods on cdc contradict themselves so badly when defending him too. The best 2 I've heard so far are: 1)He has well respected/connected writers on his site. Who? Andy Strikland, lol@him. 2)He is just reporting what he hears, don't you know what a rumour is? Oh o.k then why are any sites/writers banned mods? don't you know what a rumour is? This video sums it up quite nicely. NOTE: It has swearing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miss Korea Bob.Loblaw Posted February 17, 2011 Share Posted February 17, 2011 Nick Kypreos says ANYBODY can be a source. ANYBODY, including my neighbour. Take that, bieksa3-!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Strome Posted February 17, 2011 Share Posted February 17, 2011 Nick Kypreos says ANYBODY can be a source. ANYBODY, including my neighbour. Take that, bieksa3-!!!!! Ya I love that commercial! But what the hell does sportsnet know? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b3. Posted February 18, 2011 Author Share Posted February 18, 2011 I decided to change things up, I got rid of 'Valid Sources', and just going to stick with Invalid Sources from now on. The Valid Sources list seemed a tad unnecessary due to the Invalid Sources list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dazzle Posted February 18, 2011 Share Posted February 18, 2011 Ya I love that commercial! But what the hell does sportsnet know? Lol. IKR? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dazzle Posted February 18, 2011 Share Posted February 18, 2011 Eklund should be an invalid source, FFS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Strome Posted February 18, 2011 Share Posted February 18, 2011 Eklund should be an invalid source, FFS. That was hillarious. Yes, he should be on the invalid list. Phillips, e4, what the hell is that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dazzle Posted February 18, 2011 Share Posted February 18, 2011 That was hillarious. Yes, he should be on the invalid list. Phillips, e4, what the hell is that. Haha. Omg. I don't understand the defenders of Eklund. It's garbage. Just because he CAN report some trades doesn't mean he's any good. People on these forums called Hamhuis being a Canuck, and turns out it was true. Not to say that sources are easy to get, because they aren't. It's just that the faster Eklund gets ruled out as a valid source, the sooner that this guy loses out on what was a niche market for him. This guy's a fraudster, making money from unsuspecting people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Strome Posted February 18, 2011 Share Posted February 18, 2011 Haha. Omg. I don't understand the defenders of Eklund. It's garbage. Just because he CAN report some trades doesn't mean he's any good. People on these forums called Hamhuis being a Canuck, and turns out it was true. Not to say that sources are easy to get, because they aren't. It's just that the faster Eklund gets ruled out as a valid source, the sooner that this guy loses out on what was a niche market for him. This guy's a fraudster, making money from unsuspecting people. You're right, he is a fraudster. But I don't think his customer's are "unsuspecting" anymore. I think they enjoy paying the 20 dollars a year just to laugh at and make fun of him. well the majority of his customers anyhow. You should read some of the things on his message board, his fans/customers I think take great joy in teasing him. Yet here we sit and folks like KB3, StealthNuck and others continue to maintain he is a legit source. Sometimes the mods on this site remind me of politicians with a hidden agenda. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sharnhayre Posted February 18, 2011 Share Posted February 18, 2011 Thanks for this thread.. some of these new thread creators should take a look at this before making new useless thread about what Eklund is saying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hockeyville88 Posted February 19, 2011 Share Posted February 19, 2011 Marek got ahead of himself there a few days ago tweeting about the White/Hansen "trade" He's a pretty credible guy so no idea what he was doing going off of someone else's unsubstantiated rumour and throwing it back out there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dazzle Posted February 19, 2011 Share Posted February 19, 2011 Marek got ahead of himself there a few days ago tweeting about the White/Hansen "trade" He's a pretty credible guy so no idea what he was doing going off of someone else's unsubstantiated rumour and throwing it back out there LOL. It doesn't seem "unsubstantiated" at all. There was a guy named "Dallas Dave", a guy that Opmac pointed out, that correctly predicted a trade before it happened, and he also was talking about White & Hansen. Jeez I know you love Hansen to death, but you're gonna have to accept the fact that he was dangled in a trade. I don't get you - it's so easy for you to accept the Grabner trade, even the day when it happened, but it's so difficult for you to accept the Hansen trade. I would be hard-pressed to accept both of those trades, since they've been on the Canucks property for so long. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carib_canuck Posted February 19, 2011 Share Posted February 19, 2011 Hasn't NHLsourcessay been proven to be a nhl office worker who sees trade paperwork and broken a few trades first..... Could be wrong on this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Vintage Canuck- Posted February 26, 2011 Share Posted February 26, 2011 . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.