لني Posted December 17, 2010 Share Posted December 17, 2010 most team,s would love to have him ? I have to call BS on that statement, the fact he is still a Nuck proves no team wants him and his rude contract, hopefully MG won't have to waive him to move him when Salo is ready to return. The fact that he's still a Canuck proves nothing. Stop being an idiot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CANUCKLELION Posted December 17, 2010 Share Posted December 17, 2010 The fact that he's still a Canuck proves nothing. Stop being an idiot. If you actually believe MG hasn't tried, unsuccessfully, I might add, to move Bieksa, you probably also believe in Santa Clause + the Easter Bunny.lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sharpshooter Posted December 17, 2010 Share Posted December 17, 2010 Funny how the Bieksa lovers never see these things and he literally does like at least 20 of these brutal plays every night and makes it extremely hard on his team mates. I guess they are just too dense to notice things around them and can't put them 2 and 2 together. Or they just assume it is okay when someone covers up for his mistakes. Literally? I don't think you understand the meaning of the word. If he LITERALLY makes at least 20 brutal plays every night, that means mean he makes at LEAST one brutal play every shift....literally. He averages around 20 or so minutes game and averages probably around 1 min per shift, so that would mean he's LITERALLY making brutal plays every shift of every game?? Your grasp of the English language is about as dense as your grasp on Bieksa's play, contribution, and value, let alone your ability to give a fair assessment. And so, because of that, when you do speak on the subject of Bieksa, you literally ALWAYS come off as a hyperbolic moron.......literally........always..........moron. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
لني Posted December 17, 2010 Share Posted December 17, 2010 If you actually believe MG hasn't tried, unsuccessfully, I might add, to move Bieksa, you probably also believe in Santa Clause + the Easter Bunny.lol Makes zero sense. But I don't expect more from you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUPERTKBD Posted December 17, 2010 Share Posted December 17, 2010 Yes the Edler - Ehrhoff pairing gets the lion's share of ice time with the Twins, because they are effective, even when Bxa got his time he managed a career +/- minus 20. Bieksa is a liability, even when playing with the twins. He is a minus player. Who cares about career numbers. What do the current numbers say? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CANUCKLELION Posted December 17, 2010 Share Posted December 17, 2010 WOW! I almost forgot how crapty he is at clearing the crease and tracking down the puck. It is unbelievable sometimes to think that we had both Bieksa and Pyatt at one point. The worst people in the league at finding pucks and receiving passes. I remember the Detroit one clearly. He literally took like 5 seconds to realize that the puck was at his feet. 5 seconds is HUGE in a game where a split second counts.haha Worst player ever easily! Even AHlers have better fundamentals. Yep I think BXa must have a neck injury, he never has his head on a swivel, never looks around, that and he's a terrible fisher. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sharpshooter Posted December 17, 2010 Share Posted December 17, 2010 Yep I think BXa must have a neck injury, he never has his head on a swivel, never looks around, that and he's a terrible fisher. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EmployeeoftheMonth Posted December 17, 2010 Share Posted December 17, 2010 most team,s would love to have him ? I have to call BS on that statement, the fact he is still a Nuck proves no team wants him and his rude contract, hopefully MG won't have to waive him to move him when Salo is ready to return. Or it proves that the canucks haven't offered him to anybody. Funny thing about proof though is it shouldn't prove two contradictory statements. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tatoes Posted December 17, 2010 Share Posted December 17, 2010 People here are crazy. The only reason we got pass the first round in the playoffs was Ohlund one year and Salo the next two years. Of course Luongo had a lot to do with that but that is besides the point. For a team that wants to make a deep run, trading Salo, whether he is injury prone or not, would be the most idiotic thing EVER. The worst part of that is too is that we would be doing that just keep Bieksa? Please! LOL As for Edler, wherever you want to rank him currently, he is the only defenseman we have that has even a chance to have the Pronger effect, meaning whatever team he goes to he stabilizes them so well that they either win a cup or make the finals. His upside to be a bonafide top 2 defenseman alone should make him untouchable. Trade Edler to keep our 7th defenseman that should be in the AHL? LOL You people are riots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EmployeeoftheMonth Posted December 17, 2010 Share Posted December 17, 2010 People here are crazy. The only reason we got pass the first round in the playoffs was Ohlund one year and Salo the next two years. Of course Luongo had a lot to do with that but that is besides the point. For a team that wants to make a deep run, trading Salo, whether he is injury prone or not, would be the most idiotic thing EVER. The worst part of that is too is that we would be doing that just keep Bieksa? Please! LOL As for Edler, wherever you want to rank him currently, he is the only defenseman we have that has even a chance to have the Pronger effect, meaning whatever team he goes to he stabilizes them so well that they either win a cup or make the finals. His upside to be a bonafide top 2 defenseman alone should make him untouchable. Trade Edler to keep our 7th defenseman that should be in the AHL? LOL You people are riots. Did someone say trade Edler or Salo? Literally? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tatoes Posted December 17, 2010 Share Posted December 17, 2010 Literally? I don't think you understand the meaning of the word. If he LITERALLY makes at least 20 brutal plays every night, that means mean he makes at LEAST one brutal play every shift....literally. He averages around 20 or so minutes game and averages probably around 1 min per shift, so that would mean he's LITERALLY making brutal plays every shift of every game?? Your grasp of the English language is about as dense as your grasp on Bieksa's play, contribution, and value, let alone your ability to give a fair assessment. And so, because of that, when you do speak on the subject of Bieksa, you literally ALWAYS come off as a hyperbolic moron.......literally........always..........moron. For the super dense people like you, I have to exaggerate to get my point across. Unfortunately, people like you are still too stupid to see his play on the ice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUPERTKBD Posted December 17, 2010 Share Posted December 17, 2010 People here are crazy. The only reason we got pass the first round in the playoffs was Ohlund one year and Salo the next two years. Of course Luongo had a lot to do with that but that is besides the point. For a team that wants to make a deep run, trading Salo, whether he is injury prone or not, would be the most idiotic thing EVER. The worst part of that is too is that we would be doing that just keep Bieksa? Please! LOL As for Edler, wherever you want to rank him currently, he is the only defenseman we have that has even a chance to have the Pronger effect, meaning whatever team he goes to he stabilizes them so well that they either win a cup or make the finals. His upside to be a bonafide top 2 defenseman alone should make him untouchable. Trade Edler to keep our 7th defenseman that should be in the AHL? LOL You people are riots. Who was talking about "trading Salo"? I think most people realize he has an NTC. I also don't recall much (if any) talk of trading Edler. Did you just post for the sake of posting because things were starting to get a bit to reasonable? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUPERTKBD Posted December 17, 2010 Share Posted December 17, 2010 For the super dense people like you, I have to exaggerate to get my point across. Unfortunately, people like you are still too stupid to see his play on the ice. I have never reported anyone, (and don't intend to start now) but for someone as lacking in knowledge as you, to say things like that about anyone is deserving of a perma-ban. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tatoes Posted December 17, 2010 Share Posted December 17, 2010 Did someone say trade Edler or Salo? Literally? Yes, and taking potshots at me accomplishes nothing because Sharpshooter is too stupid to realize the word literally is used quite sporadically in message boards. Anyone with half a brain should realize that. lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tatoes Posted December 17, 2010 Share Posted December 17, 2010 Who was talking about "trading Salo"? I think most people realize he has an NTC. I also don't recall much (if any) talk of trading Edler. Did you just post for the sake of posting because things were starting to get a bit to reasonable? No. If you read any Bieksa thread, there is always a trade Salo post in there somewhere. I don't know if you actually want to read that far back but the trade Salo and Edler suggestions are in here somewhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EmployeeoftheMonth Posted December 17, 2010 Share Posted December 17, 2010 Yes, and taking potshots at me accomplishes nothing because Sharpshooter is too stupid to realize the word literally is used quite sporadically in message boards. Anyone with half a brain should realize that. lol Show me literally where someone has said what you claimed. Just because something is used incorrectly all the time doesn't make it all of a sudden correct. Literally means what it means. Anyone with a quarter of a brain should realize that. lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EmployeeoftheMonth Posted December 17, 2010 Share Posted December 17, 2010 No. If you read any Bieksa thread, there is always a trade Salo post in there somewhere. I don't know if you actually want to read that far back but the trade Salo and Edler suggestions are in here somewhere. So what you're saying is you literally pulled that comment out of your arse? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUPERTKBD Posted December 17, 2010 Share Posted December 17, 2010 No. If you read any Bieksa thread, there is always a trade Salo post in there somewhere. I don't know if you actually want to read that far back but the trade Salo and Edler suggestions are in here somewhere. If you have to go "hunting" for it "somewhere" I'd consider it nothing to take seriously. I'd be willing to bet that it's been suggested with far less frequency than trading Bieksa for "a bag of pucks", or simply waiving him. I can't speak for everyone, but I know which option most reasonable posters would consider most ridiculous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
لني Posted December 17, 2010 Share Posted December 17, 2010 No. If you read any Bieksa thread, there is always a trade Salo post in there somewhere. I don't know if you actually want to read that far back but the trade Salo and Edler suggestions are in here somewhere. Why anybody bothers arguing with you is beyond me. You are an idiot and a waste of time, space and skin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sharpshooter Posted December 17, 2010 Share Posted December 17, 2010 I have never reported anyone, (and don't intend to start now) but for someone as lacking in knowledge as you, to say things like that about anyone is deserving of a perma-ban. Lol......it's cool Rupert....most of us are big boys here and we can take a little hipcheck now and then(stick and stones and all that). I've got pretty thick skin and most people here should as well after 271 pages. Calling me stupid only shows his moronicalness(it's a word now!). No reporting is necessary, not that you were going to, i know. Big boys can always take a little shot from the little boys, besides..... He's fun to play with....so it's all good. Cheers bud. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.