BruinsForCup2011 Posted December 27, 2010 Share Posted December 27, 2010 Yes, it was a timely goal, gwg no less, a bit of a seeing eye shot, but it worked. Kudos to Mr. Bieksa. I hope he boosted his trade value. Although in all honesty, I expected a strong game from BXa tonight as he always plays well against the bottom feeder teams. lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CANUCKLELION Posted December 27, 2010 Share Posted December 27, 2010 Don't you love it when the King of the Trolls says something stupid and Juice comes out and exposes it for the garbage that it is? lol! you are in denial, only counting his shots that actually hit the net, BXa's shot % is 4.2 %, 479th in the league. That buddy is a garbage %. lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugemanskost Posted December 27, 2010 Share Posted December 27, 2010 Once again, as I have observed over the past 4 or 5 weeks, Bieksa was the best Canucks defender and the best defender on the ice... period. I am looking forward to seeing how KB and the rest of the Canucks defence performs against another of the NHL's elite teams, Philly, on Tuesday. Bieksa played another positionally sound, defensively aware, physical game tonight. The same will be needed On Tuesday night. And Canucklelion, the Coilers have been playing much better the past two weeks or so despite their record. In a weak NW division, they could very well make the playoffs this season. They are not, in my opinion, "bottom feeders". They are an up-and-coming, young team only 9 points out of a playoff spot. The East has a couple of "bottom feeders", though, in Jersey and the Islanders. If Bieksa, in your opinion, isn't worth his cap hit, how about Kovalchuk? Nice game tonight, Juice! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BruinsForCup2011 Posted December 27, 2010 Share Posted December 27, 2010 you are in denial, BXa's shot % is 4.2 %, 479th in the league. That buddy is a garbage %. lol I guess Doughty, Weber, and Keith all have garbage shots too then at 4.3, 4.2 and 4.1 % right? How about Pronger at 5.1? By the way Bieksa's shot percentage is 5.5% after tonight - oh look, you're WRONG again! Time to backpedal/divert! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
themcdeal Posted December 27, 2010 Share Posted December 27, 2010 I guess Doughty, Weber, and Keith all have garbage shots too then at 4.3, 4.2 and 4.1 % right? How about Pronger at 5.1? By the way Bieksa's shot percentage is 5.5% after tonight - oh look, you're WRONG again! Time to backpedal/divert! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sharpshooter Posted December 27, 2010 Share Posted December 27, 2010 Yes, it was a timely goal, gwg no less, a bit of a seeing eye shot, but it worked. Kudos to Mr. Bieksa. I hope he boosted his trade value. Although in all honesty, I expected a strong game from BXa tonight as he always plays well against the bottom feeder teams. lol I'm just glad you showed up. It made his goal and performance that much better. Stick around, won't ya? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amish Rake Fighter Posted December 27, 2010 Share Posted December 27, 2010 you are in denial, BXa's shot % is 4.2 %, 479th in the league. That buddy is a garbage %. lol Speaking of rancid garbage remember that time you blew 1000 posts trying to convince CDC that Hansen was a useless plug that didn't belong in the NHL ? I'm seeing a pattern here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CANUCKLELION Posted December 27, 2010 Share Posted December 27, 2010 I guess Doughty, Weber, and Keith all have garbage shots too then at 4.3, 4.2 and 4.1 % right? How about Pronger at 5.1? By the way Bieksa's shot percentage is 5.5% after tonight I don't believe it is appropriate to mention BXa in the same breath as any of those guys, shooting % aside they excel as NHL Dmen, BXa doesn't. BTW are you saying after 1 game his career % will be 5.5%? That smells like garbage to me.lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BruinsForCup2011 Posted December 27, 2010 Share Posted December 27, 2010 I don't believe it is appropriate to mention BXa in the same breath as any of those guys, shooting % aside they excel as NHL Dmen, BXa doesn't. BTW are you saying after 1 game his career % will be 5.5%? That smells like garbage to me.lol His percentage on the year. The problem with you is, as soon as someone shoots down one of your retarded angles, you just jump on some other one - you're a never ending storm of BS. Your "logic" is almost always easily countered with a simple, common sense fact - and then you pretend that nothing happened and drone on as if you have any credibility. Go back to Calgary buddy - they could use some fans on that sinking ship, and you could have a BLAST ripping on JBo/Iggy! And then WE don't have to put up with your negative whining all the time either - a win win, I think! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sharpshooter Posted December 27, 2010 Share Posted December 27, 2010 I don't believe it is appropriate to mention BXa in the same breath as any of those guys, shooting % aside they excel as NHL Dmen, BXa doesn't. BTW are you saying after 1 game his career % will be 5.5%? That smells like garbage to me.lol He clearly wasn't...and you know that. You just have nothing left, except conitued asinine bs. It's awesome. It's like watching a drowning man grasping for a glass of water.....'lol'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aquiace Posted December 27, 2010 Share Posted December 27, 2010 I don't believe it is appropriate to mention BXa in the same breath as any of those guys, shooting % aside they excel as NHL Dmen, BXa doesn't. BTW are you saying after 1 game his career % will be 5.5%? That smells like garbage to me.lol Straws... you grasp at them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugemanskost Posted December 27, 2010 Share Posted December 27, 2010 He clearly wasn't...and you know that. You just have nothing left, except conitued asinine bs. It's awesome. It's like watching a drowning man grasping for a glass of water.....'lol'. one armed man... cliff... itchy nutsack... ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CANUCKLELION Posted December 27, 2010 Share Posted December 27, 2010 His percentage on the year. The problem with you is, as soon as someone shoots down one of your retarded angles, you just jump on some other one - you're a never ending storm of BS. Your "logic" is almost always easily countered with a simple, common sense fact - and then you pretend that nothing happened and drone on as if you have any credibility. Go back to Calgary buddy - they could use some fans on that sinking ship, and you could have a BLAST ripping on JBo/Iggy! And then WE don't have to put up with your negative whining all the time either - a win win, I think! I"ve been consistent in my angle, I just can't wait till Salo gets back, Bieksa is his replacement, sure he is doing the job but IMO the only retarded angle is the one you Bieksa apologists take. The one that doesn't involve moving Bieksa to create the cap space to welcome Salo back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sharpshooter Posted December 27, 2010 Share Posted December 27, 2010 LMAO @ 'themcdeal'....oh how I wish I could post that without getting banned. I applaud you and wish you well during your timeout. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sharpshooter Posted December 27, 2010 Share Posted December 27, 2010 one armed man... cliff... itchy nutsack... ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh... "lol" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amish Rake Fighter Posted December 27, 2010 Share Posted December 27, 2010 Who has the top plus/minus on the Canucks D now ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Big Luongo Posted December 27, 2010 Share Posted December 27, 2010 That game tonight was textbook defence by Bieksa. Bieksa was a stud out there and made a huge impact even without the game winning goal but great to see him let that old shot of his go and pick the open side with the head up! Like i said before Bieksa is looking like our most solid defensemen out there game in a and game out and he is not going anywhere thankfully for this team and the fans. Side note another not so good performence from Edler hopefully he turns his game around soon he has been pretty weak for a while now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Palms Posted December 27, 2010 Share Posted December 27, 2010 Bieksa is playing well, no doubt. And if he plays like this in the playoffs, i'd keep him over Salo. = BUT = I am sure, that in the playoffs, he will make critical errors that cost us games. deal with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sharpshooter Posted December 27, 2010 Share Posted December 27, 2010 Bieksa is playing well, no doubt. And if he plays like this in the playoffs, i'd keep him over Salo. = BUT = I am sure, that in the playoffs, he will make critical errors that cost us games. deal with it. Keep choking that chicken, Harry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Big Luongo Posted December 27, 2010 Share Posted December 27, 2010 Bieksa is playing well, no doubt. And if he plays like this in the playoffs, i'd keep him over Salo. = BUT = I am sure, that in the playoffs, he will make critical errors that cost us games. deal with it. Thats a pretty negative attitude you have there. Bieksa has been playing some of his best all around hockey in the Canucks uniform and now that hes in the zone he is in and healthy i don't think there is anything thats going to stop him. As a matter of fact it would be hard to play any better then Bieksa is right now he is playing a great all around game and is a bounce or 2 away from lighting it up offensively he definitely has that potential. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.