Danthecanucksfan Posted March 28, 2012 Share Posted March 28, 2012 Who would you trade (including/excluding schneider) to get young players like skinner Hedman and landeskog??? INCLUDE any other young players you can think of!!! What would it take to get it done? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marleau_12 Posted March 28, 2012 Share Posted March 28, 2012 Why would Carolina give up Jeff Skinner for a goalie, when they already have Cam Ward? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted March 28, 2012 Share Posted March 28, 2012 Skinner = Pipe dream Landeskog = A very BIG maybe Hedman = Not gonna happen unless TB is desperate Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danthecanucksfan Posted March 28, 2012 Author Share Posted March 28, 2012 Why would Carolina give up Jeff Skinner for a goalie, when they already have Cam Ward? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marleau_12 Posted March 28, 2012 Share Posted March 28, 2012 I don't see Colorado giving up on Landeskog either. He looks so promising. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danthecanucksfan Posted March 28, 2012 Author Share Posted March 28, 2012 yeah plus it's tough to give divisional opponents guys like Cory Schneider, it would be tough to vs in so many games every year Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marleau_12 Posted March 28, 2012 Share Posted March 28, 2012 I don't think anyone has the slightest idea what will happen with Schneider, but hopefully we get a good return for him (or Luongo). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miss Korea Bob.Loblaw Posted March 28, 2012 Share Posted March 28, 2012 lol it's just for fun, not meant to be realistic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lonny_Bohonos_14 Posted March 28, 2012 Share Posted March 28, 2012 Ballard, Raymond + 1st for (take your pick) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ken kaniff Posted April 1, 2012 Share Posted April 1, 2012 i think tampa would be willing to part with hedman if they draft another solid defense prospect. im thinking we sign schneids first. 3 years 3mill per year then trade schneider for hedman and det 1st. tampa gets an allstar and they keep there first to draft a defensive prospect. then they can sign some vet d for the season to come and develop that prospect to replace hedman. schneider can defend better than anyone and hedman hasnt done much for them. plus they have ohlund coming back next year so he can fill some shoes on the blue-line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
erkayloomeh Posted April 1, 2012 Share Posted April 1, 2012 id just about blow up the team for hedman. schnieds this years first raymond and sauve Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ilya Mikheyev Posted April 1, 2012 Share Posted April 1, 2012 id just about blow up the team for hedman. schnieds this years first raymond and sauve Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renelsisc Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 to TAMPA: Luongo Raymond Sauve 1st to VAN: Hedman Connelly Luongo has a huge contract, and i really have a feeling that he'd choke this year, as much as I dont want him to. Raymond is zero trade value. Sauve is a good prospect, and a 1st is a 1st even if it's 30th so in order to make Tampa take Raymond and Lu's contract, we'd throw in Sauve and 1st. Might actually have to switch Tanev instead of Sauve to get that done too. With $7m in salary gone, we'd be able to sign Schneider and hedman long term, probably $5 mil for both of them combined, saving us $2mil. Then, in the off season, trade Ballard for any pick we may be able to get, and we'd free another $4mil. Sedins - Burrows Higgins - Kesler - Booth Connelly - Schroeder - Hansen Lapierre - Pahlsson - Kassian Hammer - Juice Hedman - Edler MAG - Salo Schneider Lack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stark Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 to TAMPA: Luongo Raymond Sauve 1st to VAN: Hedman Connelly Luongo has a huge contract, and i really have a feeling that he'd choke this year, as much as I dont want him to. Raymond is zero trade value. Sauve is a good prospect, and a 1st is a 1st even if it's 30th so in order to make Tampa take Raymond and Lu's contract, we'd throw in Sauve and 1st. Might actually have to switch Tanev instead of Sauve to get that done too. With $7m in salary gone, we'd be able to sign Schneider and hedman long term, probably $5 mil for both of them combined, saving us $2mil. Then, in the off season, trade Ballard for any pick we may be able to get, and we'd free another $4mil. Sedins - Burrows Higgins - Kesler - Booth Connelly - Schroeder - Hansen Lapierre - Pahlsson - Kassian Hammer - Juice Hedman - Edler MAG - Salo Schneider Lack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 Stevie Y laughs in your face. Hedman AND Connolly for an aging goaltender with a big contract, a winger who falls down way too often, an unproven D prospect, and a late (25-30) 1st? Tampa is building for the future. You are severely overvaluing our players and undervaluing theirs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stark Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 Uhh, Stevie Y would take Luongo alone for Hedman and Connolly. Do you know how badly they need a goalie?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kloubek Posted April 4, 2012 Share Posted April 4, 2012 First - I would be *thrilled* if Gillis managed to get Luongo down to Tampa instead of Schneider. I think the both have trade value, but I prefer Schneider's attitude and composure at all times. So let's just say this was possible and Luongo agreed to waive his NTC. I truly think he would accept this, since a) His wife is down there, and Vancouver is brutal on goalies and perhaps he has been jeered by the fans one too many times. I don't think Luongo's contract is prohibative. He started out making too much, but the yearly cap hit is very reasonable for someone of his ability. I think the player we mainly would want to target is Hedman. While originally Hedman might have been deemed untouchable, I don't think he has developed as expected. Tampa would get an elite goalie in return for a defenseman who may or may not be elite in the future. While Ballard and Raymond seems to be included in nearly every trade discussion on CDC, I do think it makes sense for us to let them go. I think Raymond would thrive in a place like Tampa, and perhaps Ballard could regain his form... although it is a bit of a wild card. I am not sure that Conolly is a player we should target though. Even though he is a BC boy which is awesome, he is still a little undersized, is a natural centre (which we don't need), and being a high draft pick Tampa would want quite a bit in return. Furthermore, we don't so much need guys who will develop in 2-3 years as we do players which will make an impact right away. For this reason, I would suggest some sort of package with Luongo, Ballard and perhaps Raymond for Hedman and Purcell - with a dash or two of later draft picks to taste. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
palindrom Posted April 5, 2012 Share Posted April 5, 2012 Edler for Landeskog Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spotted Zebra Posted April 5, 2012 Share Posted April 5, 2012 Defs Edler + for Landeskog Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caboose Posted April 6, 2012 Share Posted April 6, 2012 Uhh, Stevie Y would take Luongo alone for Hedman and Connolly. Do you know how badly they need a goalie?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.