bronski beat Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 "this is what we live for" what a joke Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BabyBolland Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 fleury. at least it will be higher scoring Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Van_City123 Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 It doesnt matter. We need to score. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plaguez Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 Put Luongo in..no sense in letting Schneider be the lightning rod when the Canucks lose in 4. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stark Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 I say suit Schneider up in Edler's place on the blueline. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnnyrocks Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 It's not the goalie that is lacking, but rather the offensive ability. Man frack, 48 shots in game 2 and only 2 goals goes in, and now 41 shots AND A NO GOAL AND A FRICKIN' SHUTOUT! COME ON CANUCKS! You've got to wake up! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shazzam Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 i think this game forces everyone to see that neither goaltender is the problem. everyone says when lu lets in a goal it deflated the team, how about when lu stands on his head in game 1 and everyone else plays like garbage? how about when schneider stands on his head and we dont score a goal? how about 12 goals in our last 10 playoff games or 2 goals on our last 89 shots? just saying Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony Romo Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 Who cares? We're done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luongo97 Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 empty net wouldnt be a bad idea if we played better with a man advantage than we do even strength lol. i vote no refs next game and just let them play 5 on 5 all game Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gran Turismo Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 Not that it matters. Neither Schnieder nor Luongo scores goals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ninja321 Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 Luongo no doubt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canucksbiggestfan Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 Who cares? Seriously. Luongo isn't coming back, he is done in Vancouver. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sia Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 Well, Schneider played spectacular and only let in a goal whereas Luongo played good and let in 4. I start Schneider. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drdeath Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 Daniel Sedin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soshified Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 I rather suit up Lu and Cory on the offense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BabyBolland Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 Spectacular??? He Made 19 SAVES!!! yes, he was stellar and made some nice saves but so did Lu... Schneids basically played as well as Lu did in Game 1... Either way, our problem isn't the Goaltending and this series has proved that. and it wont' matter who starts if we can't score any goals... But I'd start Luongo for sure. He's our #1 for now and we should stick with him till the end... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tortorella's Rant Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 Luongo. Who is in net evidently does not matter. It never has, except for playing in Boston; but we all know that wasn't entirely his fault either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avicii Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 Luongo. and it will be his final start of his Vancouver Canuck career. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hockey!? Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 Start Luongo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigUncle16 Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 Luongo, because I want him gone along with AV. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.