Super_Canuck Posted April 23, 2012 Share Posted April 23, 2012 Trade #1 To TB - Luongo, Ballard and Raymond To Van - Brett Connolly, Ryan Malone and a 1st round pick Trade #2 To Anaheim - Ryan Kesler, David Booth To Vancouver - Ryan Getzlaf and 2nd round pick Then sign Ryan Suter and Paul Gaustad. Sedin-Sedin-Burrows Malone-Getzlaf-Connolly Hansen-Gaustad-Higgins Kassian-Malhotra-Lapierre Suter-Edler Bieksa-Hamhuis Salo-Tanev Schneider Lack Second line needs a play making centre, and as great as Kesler is, he is not a playmaker. Getzlaf is that, and Malone IMO is a better version of Booth. This would also bring the BC kid Brett Connolly back home. The guy is a top notch prospect who was the 6th overall pick in 2010. This also adds size to the lineup (Malone, Getzlaf, Connolly and Gaustad are all 6'2" or above) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gragnanifan1 Posted April 23, 2012 Share Posted April 23, 2012 No with a capital N Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smashian Kassian Posted April 23, 2012 Share Posted April 23, 2012 can we just wait to make trade proposals??? All the ones being posted right now are purely out of emotion.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goblix Posted April 23, 2012 Share Posted April 23, 2012 i grow weary of people trading Kesler, he had a disappointing year OFF of an injury, he'll be beast mode next year again as he recovers while practicing his golf swing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canfan4life Posted April 23, 2012 Share Posted April 23, 2012 The need to be bigger is more evident than ever. Kings owned us in this series, played us like boston did. Guys with speed like booth, raymond are almost useless and need to go. Burrows was useless in these playoffs, kesler NEEDS to score plain and simple, sedins cant win every game on their own and what can you say about edler but he is still young and is a good part of our core. Lots of decisions for MG this offseason but please no more dumb trades, really missed samuelsson, was not impressed with booth this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super_Canuck Posted April 23, 2012 Author Share Posted April 23, 2012 No with a capital N Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hockeyfan90 Posted April 23, 2012 Share Posted April 23, 2012 i grow weary of people trading Kesler, he had a disappointing year OFF of an injury, he'll be beast mode next year again as he recovers while practicing his golf swing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Merci Posted April 23, 2012 Share Posted April 23, 2012 Trade #1 To TB - Luongo, Ballard and Raymond To Van - Brett Connolly, Ryan Malone and a 1st round pick Trade #2 To Anaheim - Ryan Kesler, David Booth To Vancouver - Ryan Getzlaf and 2nd round pick Then sign Ryan Suter and Paul Gaustad. Sedin-Sedin-Burrows Malone-Getzlaf-Connolly Hansen-Gaustad-Higgins Kassian-Malhotra-Lapierre Suter-Edler Bieksa-Hamhuis Salo-Tanev Schneider Lack Second line needs a play making centre, and as great as Kesler is, he is not a playmaker. Getzlaf is that, and Malone IMO is a better version of Booth. This would also bring the BC kid Brett Connolly back home. The guy is a top notch prospect who was the 6th overall pick in 2010. This also adds size to the lineup (Malone, Getzlaf, Connolly and Gaustad are all 6'2" or above) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super_Canuck Posted April 23, 2012 Author Share Posted April 23, 2012 I wonder if people realize the second you put that in your proposal it means you could trade the Sedins for Kessel and it's still an alright proposal. Just stop you're so stupid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sunkist469 Posted April 23, 2012 Share Posted April 23, 2012 Super_Canuck the point I think he's trying to make is that a deal has to make sense for both sides, you are trading Luongo, Ballard & Raymond to Tampa Bay, explain why Tampa would even consider this move?................and PLEASE look at it on the side of Tampa, ie. HUGE contracts in both Luongo & Ballard and a skater, non-scorer in Raymond..................in Vancouver eyes dumping salary & getting a top prospect & 1st round pick looks great, but this is the real world & Steve Yzerman is no fool...............you can't throw in Malone and say it makes sense dollar wise..................the value is not there for Tampa no matter how you twist this.................. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elvis15 Posted April 23, 2012 Share Posted April 23, 2012 I'm going to stop reading proposals that have "Sign Suter/Parise/etc" as an add on at the bottom. If you can't make a case for why they'd sign here like you have to do when proposing trading for players, you can't realistically include them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timberz21 Posted April 23, 2012 Share Posted April 23, 2012 I really like the Getzlaf-Kesler deal. And i'm pretty sure it's not so far fetched. On the other hand TB's deal is awful Malone = Ballard (Two useless, cap eater, players) 1st pick >>>>> Raymond Connolly > Luongo (even if TB needs him badly) There are already stuck with Vinny's contract Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Provost Posted April 23, 2012 Share Posted April 23, 2012 I'm going to stop reading proposals that have "Sign Suter/Parise/etc" as an add on at the bottom. If you can't make a case for why they'd sign here like you have to do when proposing trading for players, you can't realistically include them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goblix Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 if loungo is going to tampa, were getting lecavelier in trade , and his contract is brutal. cash strapped for sure after that deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marty Robbins Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 just straight up give up on booth after 1 season? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goblix Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 I'm going to stop reading proposals that have "Sign Suter/Parise/etc" as an add on at the bottom. If you can't make a case for why they'd sign here like you have to do when proposing trading for players, you can't realistically include them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goblix Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 He's only ever had one good playoff series and that's against nashville last year,... Every other year and this year he has been disappointing in the playoffs. If canucks ever wants to gain back their respect in the league they got to get rid of players like Kesler and lapierre Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pouria Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 Super_Canuck the point I think he's trying to make is that a deal has to make sense for both sides, you are trading Luongo, Ballard & Raymond to Tampa Bay, explain why Tampa would even consider this move?................and PLEASE look at it on the side of Tampa, ie. HUGE contracts in both Luongo & Ballard and a skater, non-scorer in Raymond..................in Vancouver eyes dumping salary & getting a top prospect & 1st round pick looks great, but this is the real world & Steve Yzerman is no fool...............you can't throw in Malone and say it makes sense dollar wise..................the value is not there for Tampa no matter how you twist this.................. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gollumpus Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 Trade #1 To TB - Luongo, Ballard and Raymond To Van - Brett Connolly, Ryan Malone and a 1st round pick Trade #2 To Anaheim - Ryan Kesler, David Booth To Vancouver - Ryan Getzlaf and 2nd round pick Then sign Ryan Suter and Paul Gaustad. Sedin-Sedin-Burrows Malone-Getzlaf-Connolly Hansen-Gaustad-Higgins Kassian-Malhotra-Lapierre Suter-Edler Bieksa-Hamhuis Salo-Tanev Schneider Lack Second line needs a play making centre, and as great as Kesler is, he is not a playmaker. Getzlaf is that, and Malone IMO is a better version of Booth. This would also bring the BC kid Brett Connolly back home. The guy is a top notch prospect who was the 6th overall pick in 2010. This also adds size to the lineup (Malone, Getzlaf, Connolly and Gaustad are all 6'2" or above) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gollumpus Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 Reason it will work: 1.Tampa needs a goalie BADLY>>> They need a goalie worse than Columbus needs a goalie 2. Luongo is a proven franchise goalie that has multiple 30+ wins under his belt 3. Steve Y picked Luongo for the Olympics and has faith in him unlike bandwagon Canucks fans who like to ride his nuts for every loss 4. Luongo makes 5.2 million, not 100 million dollars contrary to popular beliefs. Luongo has an out-clause in 6 years and can be bought pretty cheaply, he isn't signed for 100 years or until he dies contrary to popular beliefs. 5. Luongo has family in FLA and is probably the only destination that he would waive his NTC. 6. TB has a bunch of star players and can be a playoff team, so it is easier for Bobby Lu to accept the trade, and it isn't the Panthers which he had bad history with. 7. Luongo is the only proven goalie that can be had for pretty cheap and would be more proven than guys like Harding, Bernier etc. So again, tell me why Tampa doesn't need a goalie like Bobby Lu? Can they find a better goalie than him, assuming the Canucks signed Schneider? Is Tampa comfortable going into next season with Roloson? The way people talk here about Lu, it makes it seem like we are trading Gomez. Heck, even Gomez was traded for more than a bag of pucks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.