Pears Posted April 29, 2012 Share Posted April 29, 2012 So here are the moves that would push Vancouver to the beginning of a dynasty: (Cap goes up to $70 million) Trade 1) Vancouver receives: Patrick Kane + Jeremy Morin Chicago receives: Roberto Luongo + Mason Raymond + rights to Sammy Pahlsson ---------------------------------------------------- Trade 2) Vancouver receives: rights to Ryan Suter + 2012 2nd rounder (Nsh) Nashville receives: David Booth -------------------------------------------- Trade 3) Vancouver receives: Milan Michalek + Zack Smith Ottawa receives: Manny Malhotra + Kevin Bieksa + Keith Ballard + 2012 2nd rounder (Van) -------------------------------------------------- Trade 4) (Three-Way) Vancouver receives: rights to Peter Mueller + rights to Zach Parise Colorado receives: Nick Palmieri + Petr Sykora + Dainus Zubrus + Zack Smith + 2013 2nd rounder (Van) **Colorado signs Sammy Pahlsson, Dustin Penner and Kristian Huselius** New Jersey receives: (This is a tough one) Tyson Barrie + Milan Michalek + Steve Downie + 2012 & 2013 2nd rounders (Col) **New Jersey signs Brad Stuart, Brad Boyes, Jarret Stoll, Alex Semin and Travis Moen** **Vancouver signs** Zach Parise - 7 years @ $49,000,000 Ryan Suter - Same amount/length as Parise Peter Mueller - 3 years @ $10,500,000 Canucks 2012-13 Roster Zach Parise ($7) - Ryan Kesler ($5) - Patrick Kane ($6.3) Daniel Sedin ($6.1) - Henrik Sedin ($6.1) - Peter Mueller ($3.5) Alex Burrows ($2) - Jordan Schroeder ($1) - Nicklas Jensen/Zack Kassian ($.900) Chris Higgins ($1.9) - Maxim Lapierre ($1) - Jannik Hansen ($1.3) Forwards = $42,100,000 Alexander Edler ($3.2) - Ryan Suter ($7) Chris Tanev ($.900) - Dan Hamhuis ($4.2) Marc-Andre Gragnani ($1) - Kevin Connauton ($.900) Defence = $19,200,000 Cory Schneider ($3.5) Eddie Lack ($.900) Goalies = 4,400,000 Total salary cap = $65,700,000/$70,000,000 Thoughts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BoKnows53 Posted April 29, 2012 Share Posted April 29, 2012 Hahaha Mickalek isn't getting traded and neither is Kane or bieksa. Gtfo. Here's something more realistic Spezza to new jersey for Parise a 5th and Larsson. Parise to Vancouver for Kesler. Marleau to Vancouver for Parise. Kesler to Vancouver for marleau. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted April 29, 2012 Author Share Posted April 29, 2012 Hahaha Mickalek isn't getting traded and neither is Kane or bieksa. Gtfo. Here's something more realistic Spezza to new jersey for Parise a 5th and Larsson. Parise to Vancouver for Kesler. Marleau to Vancouver for Parise. Kesler to Vancouver for marleau. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil_314 Posted April 29, 2012 Share Posted April 29, 2012 what part of tweaking the roster (and life =/= NHL 12) do people not understand? Aside from potentially (fine, likely) moving a goaltender and hopefully getting a play maker for Kesler's line (plus hopefully a young, RH, defensively solid partner for Edler, best case scenario someone better than Tanev) and an offensively capable, young 3rd line center who can also play defensively, MG doesn't have the chips and won't pull the trigger to demolish the group in the locker room right now. #OffseasonEndSoonPlease! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaunio Posted April 29, 2012 Share Posted April 29, 2012 None of those trades will ever happen. Spezza for Parise and Larsson is a huge underpayment on Ottawa's side. And why would we trade Kesler, and then re-acquire him almost immedieatley? Also Gillis almost dies laughing at the offer of Marleau for Parise. So you basically just contradicted yourself. You said mine were bad, then make one that is much worse than mine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Armada Posted April 29, 2012 Share Posted April 29, 2012 The rambalings of a crazy man. Doubt any of this would go through, good effort though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DefensivePlay Posted April 29, 2012 Share Posted April 29, 2012 this is a redo? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.