zombieksa Posted June 4, 2012 Share Posted June 4, 2012 To Minnesota: Edler 2nd To Vancouver: Stoner Latendresse (rights) 1st Minnesota is probably one of the only teams in the league that do not have a high-caliber offensive defense man. They also held the 27th ranked power play last year. Vancouver gets a steady BC boy with a hilarious last name who is very comfortable playing 3rd pairing minutes and could be a perfect fit for Tanev. Stoner was a rare +/- plus 3 on a very minus Wild team. Also very large. Has a very reasonable 1.05M cap hit for the next two seasons. Latendresse is a versatile and very large left winger that can play anywhere in the bottom 9. He is also good friends with Lapierre and had decent numbers when not injured. His injuries could give Vancouver some negotiation room in his next contract. Edit: 1st instead of 2nd. thoughts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.Doughty Posted June 4, 2012 Share Posted June 4, 2012 no Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zombieksa Posted June 4, 2012 Author Share Posted June 4, 2012 yes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted June 4, 2012 Share Posted June 4, 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dion Phaneuf Posted June 4, 2012 Share Posted June 4, 2012 F*ck no ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smashian Kassian Posted June 4, 2012 Share Posted June 4, 2012 Overpayment, the 2nd's don't fix that. If we trade Edler a good/above average top 6 winger better be coming, or a better top pair defensemen, or else he shouldn't be traded. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
etsen3 Posted June 4, 2012 Share Posted June 4, 2012 Overpayment. Edler>>>Stoner/Latrendresse Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zombieksa Posted June 4, 2012 Author Share Posted June 4, 2012 okay than, change the 2nd to a 1st and be done with it. I really don't think Edler has as much upside as everyone thinks, I never really did. but that is my opinion. Untimely broken sticks, mental lapses in own end (all season, not just in playoffs), and the inability to find a good partner other than an aging Salo makes me think that trading him now may be in our best interest. IMHO this is what he would get in return. He "might" be the next Norris level defenseman OR he could be a victim of circumstance, padded stats via Sedin Twins a la Ehrhoff. With Salo not likely on the team next year I am tentative to think about finding a new partner for Eddie. And I think with the possibility of Garrison signing with us, getting two role players and a top 10 pick is of fair value for a player who may or may not sign with the canucks next year. Edit: I realized how dumb the 2nd's thing was after I posted the initial thread, a top 10 draft pick would be a requirement in this trade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zoolander Posted June 4, 2012 Share Posted June 4, 2012 More like To MIN-Mikko Koivu, Stoner, and a 1st rd pick! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel Sedin Posted June 4, 2012 Share Posted June 4, 2012 haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sampy Posted June 4, 2012 Share Posted June 4, 2012 Brutal trade. The Nucks defense is bad enough without trading their best dman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PlayStation Posted June 4, 2012 Share Posted June 4, 2012 We already have enough stoners in BC! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dion Phaneuf Posted June 4, 2012 Share Posted June 4, 2012 50 point d-man is worth quite a bit and he is on a steal of a contract for next year, wouldn't be smart to trade him. Latendresse is good but injury-prone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zombieksa Posted June 4, 2012 Author Share Posted June 4, 2012 Brutal trade. The Nucks defense is bad enough without trading their best dman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Armada Posted June 4, 2012 Share Posted June 4, 2012 Where do you guys come up with this stuff Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Merci Posted June 4, 2012 Share Posted June 4, 2012 No only because Edler will be in a package deal for Perry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
allkill326 Posted June 4, 2012 Share Posted June 4, 2012 wow.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted June 4, 2012 Share Posted June 4, 2012 No only because Edler will be in a package deal for Perry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. White Posted June 4, 2012 Share Posted June 4, 2012 wow this has got to be the worst proposal i've seen in a while Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gally Posted June 4, 2012 Share Posted June 4, 2012 Stoner is right Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.