UFCanuck Posted June 21, 2012 Share Posted June 21, 2012 After all this Luongoes to Florida, Book it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bleednucksblue Posted June 21, 2012 Share Posted June 21, 2012 IMO, this deal HAS TO include Colborne from Toronto. We need a big, young center and MG has stated many times that this team needs to get bigger and younger. Colborne is perfect. We also need a physical, rugged defencemen, Schenn is the only choice, unless you go down the Komisarek road. My most logical deal: To TO: Luongo, Raymond, 1st To VAN: Schenn, Colborne, Scrivens Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Brahma Bull Posted June 21, 2012 Share Posted June 21, 2012 5 potential teams for Roberto Luongo: Toronto Maple Leafs, Florida Panthers, Chicago Blackhawks, Columbus Blue Jackets, and Vancouver Canucks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kass9 Posted June 21, 2012 Share Posted June 21, 2012 samjam, where's that other 2%? Draft day? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldnews Posted June 21, 2012 Share Posted June 21, 2012 Why would Toronto do this? They'd be gaining a goaltender and a 1st (likely won't help them for 3-4 years) and losing a young defenseman and a young center (which they're desperately seeking with Colborne in their system already) while adding salary and restricting their ability to be a big player in free agency. They're losing way more than they gain. C'mon people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stawns Posted June 21, 2012 Share Posted June 21, 2012 Why would Toronto do this? They'd be gaining a goaltender and a 1st (likely won't help them for 3-4 years) and losing a young defenseman and a young center (which they're desperately seeking with Colborne in their system already) while adding salary and restricting their ability to be a big player in free agency. They're losing way more than they gain. C'mon people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L'Orange Posted June 21, 2012 Share Posted June 21, 2012 That's an overpayment on Vancouver's part - take out the pick from Vancouver - and substitute a pick for Scrivens, who we don't want or need - potentially substitute Franson for Schenn and increase the value of the pick. Luongo is the big player they need. People who think the Leafs are going to poach Luongo while claiming that their 1st round picks, their best players, their young defensemen, their prospect centers - are all untouchable - are out of their mind. This is not an affirmative action deal. The Leafs don't get Luongo without a young defenseman, a center, and a pick in the deal. Who cares if they then can't go out and throw 7 million at a free agent - not the Canucks problem. Luongo strengthens their team where they need it most desperately and a starting goaltender of his calibre doesn't come for spare parts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldnews Posted June 21, 2012 Share Posted June 21, 2012 After all this Luongoes to Florida, Book it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mpt Posted June 21, 2012 Share Posted June 21, 2012 Where did Columbus come in?Did I miss something? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BraveHart Posted June 21, 2012 Share Posted June 21, 2012 Friday can't come any sooner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mpt Posted June 21, 2012 Share Posted June 21, 2012 I think you take out Raymond and add Schroeder and TO is all over that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edlerberry Posted June 21, 2012 Share Posted June 21, 2012 Are the percentages based on...what exactly? Does a pick count as a certain percentage? Is there a particular point total or save percentage that accounts for a certain percentage? Is it a ratio of percentages between what each team is offering? I think these statistics should be audited. We should get a pianist on this, pronto. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldnews Posted June 21, 2012 Share Posted June 21, 2012 Update - setback - that deal has slid back to 59%. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustJokinen! Posted June 21, 2012 Share Posted June 21, 2012 Update - setback - that deal has slid back to 59%. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted June 21, 2012 Share Posted June 21, 2012 How about this? To Vancouver: Luke Schenn + '12 1st To Toronto: Roberto Luongo + Mason Raymond + '12 2nd followed by To Vancouver: Shea Weber's rights To Nashville: David Booth + Chris Tanev + Anton Rodin + Vancouver '12 1st + '13 2nd and '13 3rd Use our pick to draft Reinhart, sign Garrison and Weber to long term contracts: Edler (bomb) - Weber (bomb) Hamhuis - Bieksa Garrison (bomb) - Schenn (could potentially have a bomb) Instantly solve our problems on defense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edlerberry Posted June 21, 2012 Share Posted June 21, 2012 What constituted the 39% sway ? Is that a pick removed from one side, or a player from another? My guess is a new competing twitter account posted inside scoop. Either that or a high school prefect with insider scoop. Either way, we need a pianist in here ASAP. EDIT EDIT EDIT Pianist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldnews Posted June 21, 2012 Share Posted June 21, 2012 Sorry got that backwards - likelihood has dropped 59% - down to 39%. Various factors involved - most relevant one being that the closer the Canucks look at Toronto's assets, the less attractive a deal with them looks. Other factors - the more they look at Florida, the better they look. Also, Burke's volatility makes the percentages difficult to track moment to moment, whereas Tallon and Gillis = solid negotiating foundation. Florida 73% Toronto 39% I know, that doesn't add up to 100%, in fact it's more, but my sources say that doesn't matter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stawns Posted June 21, 2012 Share Posted June 21, 2012 Raymond has more value than Schroeder IMO, Schroeder so far hasn't develop nearly where he should be; hopefully he can, otherwise he'll be a first round bust. People on CDC are so overhyped about Schroeder, have any of you actually seen him play in the AHL? He's non existent offensively. At his size thats a huge problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Troygamblefan Posted June 21, 2012 Share Posted June 21, 2012 Where's the samjam man to confirm this?? I think we all need to find an item that has an extra 2% Magic find to get the answer to this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheCammer Posted June 21, 2012 Share Posted June 21, 2012 Jeff O'Neill says it is 99.3% done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.