Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

Shea Weber or Rick Nash?


ChuckNORRIS4Cup

  

294 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

Why couldn't Luongo be part of the equation to get Nash.

(1) Columbus needs a goalie badly

(2) Nash is signed up at 7.8M for the next 8 or so years.

(3) Weber is a RFA and will be demanding far above Nash's salary just like Sutor and Parise

(4) An offer sheet for Weber will cost the Canucks too much in the future for draft picks

(5) Nash wants to be traded, Weber can still be signed or an offer sheet can be matched by Nashville. The Preds cannot afford to lose two prime defensemen in the same year and remain competitive. IMHO Nashville will not deal Weber as much as Canuck fans would love to have him

(6) Nashville does not need a goaltender so we would still be stuck with Luongo's contract and also have Weber's if we could sign him

(7) It would take a lengthy front loaded contract to get Weber whereas Nash's contract would be steady for the next several years

(8) Nash is a power forwarded who can put the puck in the net, He does a great job for Columbus now, look what he could do playing with the Sedins

(9) Our defense as it stands can still do a reasonable job. Supportive back checking by our forwards would supplement the D's efforts. More scoring potential and decent defense makes Nash a better fit and makes he Canucks much stronger and more competitive

My humble thoughts on the matter anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nash is one of my favorite players in the NHL right now, but I think we need Weber more than we need Nash, however, we do need someone of Nash's playing style and caliber on offense too, but really all we needed in the playoffs for the past few years now is a legit #1 D-Man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meanwhile in a no-cap NHL...

Sedin-Sedin-Nash

Booth-Kesler-Burrows

Higgins-Lapiere-Hansen

Volpatti-Malhotra-Kassian

Raymond

Weber-Edler

Hamhuis-Garrison

Bieksa-Tanev

Ballard

Connauton

Luongo-(41/41 split)-Schneider

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What if Columbus wants Booth and Kesler for Nash, because everyone knows Columbus isn't going to just give away Nash, and the Canucks will have to give up either one of these 2 to get Nash or let a lone both. As far as Weber the Canucks won't have to give up a top forward for Weber just a top D like Edler. Just remember getting Nash will cost us losing a top forward possibly 2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...