Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

Negative buyout cap hit

Recommended Posts

So I was exploring capgeek and stumbled upon something called a negative cap hit buyout. Below is a bit more information on how buyouts work but basically a negative cap hit buyout means a team can receive a credit to their cap in a given year; or in other words, they could have $2M, for example, added to their cap as opposed to subtracted from it by buying a player out of his contract.

How do buyouts work?

Teams are entitled to buy out player contracts for a portion of the remaining value of the contract — paid over a period of twice the remaining length of the contract. Following are the buyout amounts:

  • Younger than age 26 at the time of buyout, 1/3 the remaining value

  • Age 26 or older at the time of the buyout, 2/3 the remaining value

The remainder of this explanation assumes the player was not 35 or older when he signed his contract (in which case a buyout saves the team financially but does not reduce the player's cap hit).

When a player is bought out, the team still takes a cap hit for the player over a period of twice the remaining length of the contract. The amount of the cap hit (by year) is determined as follows:

  1. Take the actual salary due for each remaining year

  2. Take the Averaged Player Salary (cap hit) for the current contract

  3. Calculate the buyout amount (as described above)

  4. Spread the buy-out amount evenly over twice the remaining years of the contract

  5. Take the number in No. 1 and subtract the number in No. 4. This is the "buyout savings."

  6. Take the cap hit from No. 2 and subtract the buyout savings from No. 5.

This calculation is done for each year, meaning the buyout cap hit is not necessarily the same for all years. It can even be negative, meaning a team can receive a credit.

It's a bit complicated, so take Shea Weber as an example. His buyout works out to:

2012-13: -$3,523,810

  • 2013-14: -$3,523,810

  • 2014-15: -$3,523,810

  • 2015-16: -$3,523,810

  • 2016-17: -$1,523,810

  • 2017-18: -$1,523,810

  • 2018-19: $4,476,190

  • 2019-20: $4,476,190

  • 2020-21: $4,476,190

  • 2021-22: $4,476,190

  • 2022-23: $7,476,190

  • 2023-24: $9,476,190

  • 2024-25: $9,476,190

  • 2025-26: $9,476,190

  • 2026-27: $2,619,048

  • 2027-28: $2,619,048

  • 2028-29: $2,619,048

  • 2029-30: $2,619,048

  • 2030-31: $2,619,048

  • 2031-32: $2,619,048

  • 2032-33: $2,619,048

  • 2033-34: $2,619,048

  • 2034-35: $2,619,048

  • 2035-36: $2,619,048

  • 2036-37: $2,619,048

  • 2037-38: $2,619,048

  • 2038-39: $2,619,048

  • 2039-40: $2,619,048

So I was thinking, do you think it would be an ingenious move to sign 1 or 2 players to Weber type deals, buy them out, and then stack your team with the excess cap available? Or would a GM be run out of town for financially handcuffing his team in future years? First it would have to be a player you'd be willing to buyout and give up; so you wouldn't want to do it with a superstar. Second, you'd have to have an owner with very deep pockets.

Take the Shea Weber example from above. The first 4 years give you an additional $3.5M in cap and the 5th and 6th an additional $1.5M (double this if you were to do this with two players). Obviously, beyond this the team is handcuffed by the buyout, specifically and most severely, during years 12, 13, and 14 at a $9.5M cap hit for a player who has been bought out.

Now have a look at all the teams and their cap space available


There are 12 teams, currently, who could not afford the worst part ($9.5M) of the above buyout. While there are 4 teams who could handle two players bought out at the above scenario. Keep in mind how much easier it would be for a team in a rebuilding stage and again keep in mind that there's a reason some of these teams are so far below the cap ceiling (owners unable/unwilling to spend all that money).

Now take a team like Edmonton, where 3 of their top young players in Taylor Hall, Sam Gagne, and Jordan Eberle are all RFAs come 2013/14. Could a GM manoeuvre around the massive $9.5M deficit in cap by planning a rebuild and aligning his young new players entry level contracts (Entry Level Contract with bonuses - player can't be paid more than $3.775M) to coincide? It would take a tremendous amount of planning, some luck, and would be difficult, as you'd have to hope the draft year you plan it for is deep but technically is it a loophole that could work? Using the Edmonton example, if they're rebuilding, do they really need Shawn Horcoffs $5.5M? Ales Hemsky at $5M?

It would be pretty bold of a GM to buyout 2 players as per Webers contract and have an additional $7M for the following 4 years and $3M for the 4th and 5th years. The question is, is it possible to survive the 3 years at an $18M cap loss by planning to rebuild?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While the extra cap is nice, the cap penalty in the subsequent years is way too high for this to be viable. I'm pretty sure it was designed in such a way that no GM would realistically ever consider this a viable option.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is interesting. It would not be worth it with Webers contract, but you could sign a contract that would give you maximum negative buyout cap hit. Do not know what that contract would be, and most likely not allowed after this CBA. No team would ever do that, but its interesting to know about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Create New...