Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

[SIGNING] Canucks Sign Alexandre Mallet


UFCanuck

Recommended Posts

it's a possibility, and I wouldn't be opposed to it. Bjugstad is bigger, stronger, and closer to an NHL career than Gaunce is.

there would certainly be more pieces ot the puzzle than lou and gaunce for bjugstad though.

You'd be stupid to not take Bjudstad over Gaunce. Gaunce still has questionable skating.

I can't see Gillis accepting a deal unless the Canucks a NHL ready player. Don't think Bjudstad will play in the NHL next season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what a guy who couldn't put up 20 points in his draft year is supposed to be a great pick?

Milan Lucic, ring a bell?

Not to compare the two, but both of them came into the league as fighters then put up points when given opportunity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you mean 2011-2012??

Because he put up 81points.

I think he's a very solid pick for our bottom 6 needs in the future.

no 2011-12 was his overage year. He's been passed over before. The year before he had 19 points, the year before that 10

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no 2011-12 was his overage year. He's been passed over before. The year before he had 19 points, the year before that 10

But you don't think he was a good draft selection because he's a late bloomer?

What are your thoughts of Tanner Pearson?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But you don't think he was a good draft selection because he's a late bloomer?

What are your thoughts of Tanner Pearson?

he's another overhyped overager. 3rd liner at best

there's late bloomer, then there's 20 year old man playing against 16, 17 year olds who weigh 150 lbs. he did well this year because his team was stacked with talented players (mackinnon, drouin, etc) and he could just be a 3rd supporting player on a line, his points are a result of teammates, not his own talent

Link to comment
Share on other sites

he's another overhyped overager. 3rd liner at best

there's late bloomer, then there's 20 year old man playing against 16, 17 year olds who weigh 150 lbs. he did well this year because his team was stacked with talented players (mackinnon, drouin, etc) and he could just be a 3rd supporting player on a line, his points are a result of teammates, not his own talent

emperor-let-the-butthurt.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

instead of the 5-15 points he had every year before that? thats why he's not going to be an nhl'er. overage guys dominate 16-17 year olds so often in major junior and don't amount to anything, the next example will be mallet

So you're saying that you could do a better job of drafting than Gillis?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

he's another overhyped overager. 3rd liner at best

there's late bloomer, then there's 20 year old man playing against 16, 17 year olds who weigh 150 lbs. he did well this year because his team was stacked with talented players (mackinnon, drouin, etc) and he could just be a 3rd supporting player on a line, his points are a result of teammates, not his own talent

Pearson is the prototypical late-bloomer. Being draft eligible since 2010, Pearson has continued to work on his game and finally finds himself near the top of scouts' rankings. He had a breakout 2011-12 season. Scouts are impressed with his determination and his ability to create offensive chances. He plays with grit and tenacity, and uses his size to get in front of the net. Pearson needs to become a better skater, but you can expect him to work on it. If he improves his defensive game, expect him to surprise people at the next level.

Source:

Rotoworld.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you're saying that you could do a better job of drafting than Gillis?

at that pick absolutely. gaunce pick was fine, but to select an unranked player with 1 year of notice at all while tim bozon and damon severson were still available was a bad, bad pick.

Take him in the 5th round and it would've been a fne pick, the same thing edmonton did with laleggia

Link to comment
Share on other sites

he's another overhyped overager. 3rd liner at best

there's late bloomer, then there's 20 year old man playing against 16, 17 year olds who weigh 150 lbs. he did well this year because his team was stacked with talented players (mackinnon, drouin, etc) and he could just be a 3rd supporting player on a line, his points are a result of teammates, not his own talent

Mackinnon played on the mooseheads this year...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

at that pick absolutely. gaunce pick was fine, but to select an unranked player with 1 year of notice at all while tim bozon and damon severson were still available was a bad, bad pick.

Take him in the 5th round and it would've been a fne pick, the same thing edmonton did with laleggia

Only time will tell us whether or not this was a good pick, but I trust Gillis knows what he is doing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You'd be stupid to not take Bjudstad over Gaunce. Gaunce still has questionable skating.

I can't see Gillis accepting a deal unless the Canucks a NHL ready player. Don't think Bjudstad will play in the NHL next season.

Bjugstad is going to finish his 4th season with the gophers next season, but he'll still be in the NHL before Gaunce. and yeah, it would have to be bjugstad plus other pieces, for lou and gaunce.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...