Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

lineups


canucks10271999

Recommended Posts

Samulesson-Samulesson-Samulesson

Samulesson-Samulesson-Samulesson

Samulesson-Samulesson-Samulesson

Samulesson-Samulesson-Samulesson

Samulesson-Samulesson

Samulesson-Samulesson

Samulesson-Samulesson

Samulesson

Samulesson

Honestly idk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think it was something like this:

D. Sedin - H. Sedin - A. Burrows

M. Raymond - R. Kesler - M. Samuelsson

R. Torres - M. Malhotra - J. Hansen

C. Higgins - M. Lapierre - C. Hodgson

D. Hamhuis - K. Bieksa

A. Edler - S. Salo

K. Ballard - C. Tanev

R. Luongo

C. Schneider

i forget what it was exactly so this may not be accurate

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Naslund-Morrison-Bertuzzi

Sedin-Sedin-Samuelsson

Burrows-Kesler-Hansen

Bure-Linden-Mogilny

Ohlund-Jovanovski

Hamhuis-Salo

Smith-Banks

Whitaker

Luongo

Seinfeld

But really

Sedin-Sedin-Burrows

Raymond-Kesler-Samuelsson

Higgins-Lapierre-Hansen

Torres-Hodgson-Glass

Bolduc

Oreskovich

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think it was something like this:

D. Sedin - H. Sedin - A. Burrows

M. Raymond - R. Kesler - M. Samuelsson

R. Torres - M. Malhotra - J. Hansen

C. Higgins - M. Lapierre - C. Hodgson

D. Hamhuis - K. Bieksa

A. Edler - S. Salo

K. Ballard - C. Tanev

R. Luongo

C. Schneider

i forget what it was exactly so this may not be accurate

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Top line was Sedins with Burrows and sometimes Samuelsson

2nd line was Kesler with usually Raymond and Samuelsson. Sometimes Burrows or Higgins

3rd line was Lapierre with Torres and Hansen. Sometimes Higgins or Raymond would take a shift for someone.

4th line was whoever was left out of the top 9, and 2 of Glass, Oreo, Hodgson, and eventually Malhotra.

Tambellini also got shifts on several lines.

Defence was

Hamhuis - Bieksa

Edler - Ehrhoff

Ballard/Alberts/Rome/Tanev - Salo

Lu

Schneider

I might be forgetting a depth player, but I think this is pretty accurate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does it really annoy you that much that some kid is asking a question about the canucks on the canucks website?

so much so you have to

1. Insult him

2. Not once but twice (maybe more haven't head the whole thread)

3. Waste your life getting worked up about it.

Yes, for some reason it does, you know what that means?

You need to get a life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...