TACIC Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 Could we get Kane? here is my proposal Van. Luongo Raymond Edler 2013 2nd Malhotra Chi. Kane Saad 2nd or 1st in 2013 conditional 6th(If Kane gets more than 30 goals it goes to Chicago if not it goes to the Canucks) and sign Arnott to 1 year 1.2 mil contract Lineup D.Sedin,H.Sedin,Burrows/Kane Booth,Kesler,Burrows/Kane Higgins,Lapierre,Hansen Volpatti/Weise,Arnott/Schroeder,Kassian Would be nice because Kesler works well with Kane/Burrows and the sedins would get a scorer on their line any way and if Kes ain't ready for the season Schroeder or Lappy can move up to second. Hamuis-Bieksa Ballard-Garrison Connauton/Alberts-Tanev Solid defense and our offense would make up for it.Ballard would be able to rush with Garrison holding the fort Schneider Lack Could sign Ellis too With this lineup we would not even need doan and Arnott could move up and down the lineup Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TACIC Posted August 17, 2012 Author Share Posted August 17, 2012 post thoughts and also what could be edited in it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RonMexico Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 While I don't like your offer, I would love to get Kane. How about stop complicating it by making it less of a lop-sided swap. Everyone thinks we can just package up all the undesirables and offload them like yesterday's garbage. Just try something like Edler for Kane. A fair swap to me. Sure it makes the defense worse overall...but just slide Ballard into the top 4 and ride him like a rented mule. If he stays as terrible as he has been, then at least we know for sure that he is no good. There is still an air of mystery around him in my mind. Trying to guess which prospects or picks to throw in is essentially throwing darts in the dark. And leave Arnott in the graveyard where he belongs...we have enough marginal centers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cIutch Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 as much as i like kane whats with the luongo , ballard raymond and maholtra sht? cmon bud be realistic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nuck nit Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 I have a problem taking any Hawk and I am sure Luo might have issues picking the wind and cold over pizza and sun. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TACIC Posted August 17, 2012 Author Share Posted August 17, 2012 While I don't like your offer, I would love to get Kane. How about stop complicating it by making it less of a lop-sided swap. Everyone thinks we can just package up all the undesirables and offload them like yesterday's garbage. Just try something like Edler for Kane. A fair swap to me. Sure it makes the defense worse overall...but just slide Ballard into the top 4 and ride him like a rented mule. If he stays as terrible as he has been, then at least we know for sure that he is no good. There is still an air of mystery around him in my mind. Trying to guess which prospects or picks to throw in is essentially throwing darts in the dark. And leave Arnott in the graveyard where he belongs...we have enough marginal centers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 Did we clone Edler? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steviewonder20 Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 How did we trade Edler and still have him in our line up? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vancouvercanucks#1 Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 Kane, great player, terrible person. No thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TACIC Posted August 17, 2012 Author Share Posted August 17, 2012 How did we trade Edler and still have him in our line up? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jester13 Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 how about this trade: to Van: Chicago's entire roster to Chicago: Vancouver's entire roster What, too much involved? Seriously tho, when do you ever see a trade involving a million pieces? Never. "Hey let's unload our dirty laundry for their best player!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Kane Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 Chicago isn't looking to trade Kane and they are certainly not looking to trade Saad. Saad is the next golden boy in Chicago and Bowman has him penciled into the top 6 already. The have been marketing the heck out of Saad, he even announced out first round pick at this year's draft. Chicago would never do that deal, Kane is the best player (now) in that deal and Saad could be the best player in the long term. I'll give you credit though, it's not a bad deal you put together (it's better than most Chicago/Vancouver deals I've seen). The one piece you missed was a goalie gone back to Vancouver, we'd have to shed some more salary so Crawford would need to go to Vancouver. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Kane Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 how about this trade: to Van: Chicago's entire roster to Chicago: Vancouver's entire roster What, too much involved? Seriously tho, when do you ever see a trade involving a million pieces? Never. "Hey let's unload our dirty laundry for their best player!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TACIC Posted August 17, 2012 Author Share Posted August 17, 2012 Chicago isn't looking to trade Kane and they are certainly not looking to trade Saad. Saad is the next golden boy in Chicago and Bowman has him penciled into the top 6 already. The have been marketing the heck out of Saad, he even announced out first round pick at this year's draft. Chicago would never do that deal, Kane is the best player (now) in that deal and Saad could be the best player in the long term. I'll give you credit though, it's not a bad deal you put together. The one piece you missed was a goalie gone back to Vancouver, we'd have to shed some more salary so Crawford would need to go to Vancouver. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Underachieving Hero of CDC Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 I'd have an issue with a guy like Patrick Kane on our team. He's a very talented player but you gotta remember that there are very good reasons why the Hawks might be trying to unload him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TACIC Posted August 17, 2012 Author Share Posted August 17, 2012 I think this is something every fan base does. I can't count the number of Frolik and Olesz for <insert all star's name> I've seen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EvoLu7ioN Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 The only player on Chicago that's worthy of drawing Edler out of Van would be Jonathan Toews. Anybody else, no thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John.Tallhouse Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 I don't think you need to include Manny in that deal.. other than that im okay with it.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TACIC Posted August 17, 2012 Author Share Posted August 17, 2012 I don't think you need to include Manny in that deal.. other than that im okay with it.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kanucks1 Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 I like it! EVERYBODY NEEDS TO STOP UNDER-RATING lUONGO RAYMOND MALHOLTRA AND BALLARD! thats a lot to give up but we're getting a good return. It's a good solid trade 4 both sides! Thx Pcuzz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.