Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

[Proposal] Van - Edm - Chicago


Recommended Posts

Edmonton

- Jordan Schroeder

- Niklas Hjalmarsson

Chicago

- Sam Gagner

- Roberto Luongo

Vancouver

- Dave Bolland

- Kyle Beach

- 1st Round 2013 (Chicago)

Edmonton gets - a top 6 center prospect who fits with Edmonons core, as well as a top- 4 d-man.

Chicago gets - 2nd line center as well as a high end goalie.

Vancouver gets - high end 3rd line center, a late 1st as well as a project prospect with solid upside.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chicago isn't trading Bolland (especially to Vancover), he's a Blackhawk for life. Chicago may get a 2nd line centre in that deal, but it leaving a gapping hole on the third line. We're better off sticking with Kane or Kruger on the 2nd line and keeping Bolland and Hjalmarsson. It's also unlikely we trade our 2013 1st rond pick since we already don't have a 2nd and 3rd round pick that year (they were traded to Winnipeg for Oduya).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yet another ridiculous trade proposal. For one thing, you have the Oilers making out like a bandit getting Schroeder and Hjalmarsson. I wouldn't even trade Hjalmarsson for Gagner straight up. Kyle Beach is problematic and may potentially be a bust.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So what makes Hjalmarsson more valuable than Gagner, who is a 23 year old center who has averaged 54 points a season over the past 5 years?

That is the exact same averge points per season Burrows has maintained the last 5 years.

So how exactly is Edmonton making out like bandits?

Yet another ridiculous trade proposal. For one thing, you have the Oilers making out like a bandit getting Schroeder and Hjalmarsson. I wouldn't even trade Hjalmarsson for Gagner straight up. Kyle Beach is problematic and may potentially be a bust.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, Beach is a project as I alluded to.

Hes not as highly touted as he was a few years ago, so he could be a buy low candidate.

At the very least he addresses some of the "youth and size" that Gillis has been addressing as of late.

Yet another ridiculous trade proposal. For one thing, you have the Oilers making out like a bandit getting Schroeder and Hjalmarsson. I wouldn't even trade Hjalmarsson for Gagner straight up. Kyle Beach is problematic and may potentially be a bust.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So EDM only gives up Gagner and gets Schroeder (potetntially as good as Gagner) and and a top 4 d-man in Hjalmarsson? How does that work? Gagner ain't that good that he alone could get you a high end prospect and a top 4 dman.

How about just take the Oilers out and just do a straight up trade with CHI. Luongo and Schroeder for Hjalmarsson, Kruger and a 1st.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Schroeder COULD be as good as Gagner... But definitely no guarantee.

Where does Hjalmarsson fit on our team, and why would we want Kruger over Bolland?

So EDM only gives up Gagner and gets Schroeder (potetntially as good as Gagner) and and a top 4 d-man in Hjalmarsson? How does that work? Gagner ain't that good that he alone could get you a high end prospect and a top 4 dman.

How about just take the Oilers out and just do a straight up trade with CHI. Luongo and Schroeder for Hjalmarsson, Kruger and a 1st.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...