Grape Posted September 14, 2012 Share Posted September 14, 2012 Good afternoon CDC, For those of you who 'ed at the title, this thread is here for a purpose. And please read the description before you post anything. For those who remember, the first thread I made since I joined CDC was exactly the same: titled "Hamhuis vs Bieksa, who's better?" And everybody was bashing me, telling me the choice was obvious. Since then, I think I've learned my lesson. So today at school, I was caught in an argument with about 10 other guys, of who's better, Hamhuis vs Bieksa? Obviously, I'm not going to tell you who I thought was better, since it'll make the poll biased. So, I tried to show him the other thread I made, and the lopsided poll, but the "search" feature wasn't working. So I decided to make a bet with them and make a new thread and ask CDC, for your opinion, on who's better. Thank you for your understanding. TGHB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kj29 Posted September 14, 2012 Share Posted September 14, 2012 Anyone remember the last 5 seconds of the Canucks playoffs? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sharpshooter Posted September 14, 2012 Share Posted September 14, 2012 Offencively, Bieksa Defencively, Hamhuis Now stop yer arguin, ya idjits. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanucksSayEh Posted September 14, 2012 Share Posted September 14, 2012 Anyone remember the last 5 seconds of the Canucks playoffs? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smashian Kassian Posted September 14, 2012 Share Posted September 14, 2012 Hamhuis no question, Bieksa isn't the same player without him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Niloc009 Posted September 14, 2012 Share Posted September 14, 2012 Anyone remember the last 5 seconds of the Canucks playoffs? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JHansenFan Posted September 15, 2012 Share Posted September 15, 2012 If you look there was one better play available then skating it out of the zone. There were no possible outlet passes, but in hindsight if he iced the puck, it would have a better result. However in the heat of the moment the last thing you want to do is to ice it, so Hamhuis made the best play available to him at that very moment. Hamhuis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sharpshooter Posted September 15, 2012 Share Posted September 15, 2012 Hamhuis no question, Bieksa isn't the same player without him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted September 15, 2012 Share Posted September 15, 2012 I'm a big Bieksa fan but I'd take Hamhuis over him in a heartbeat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
captain_kirk1 Posted September 15, 2012 Share Posted September 15, 2012 Anyone remember the last 5 seconds of the Canucks playoffs? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
captain_kirk1 Posted September 15, 2012 Share Posted September 15, 2012 Hammer makes players around him better - that's a defining quality between him and Bieksa. Bieksa may be stronger offensively but he is streaky. Hamhuis is often one of the guys who plays pretty well to great every night. Consistency (not saying he doesn't have his bad games) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smashian Kassian Posted September 15, 2012 Share Posted September 15, 2012 I assure you, Hamhuis needs Bieksa just as much to find the level of success that the two find together. Last season was enough proof of that when they played apart. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
supermanbieksa Posted September 15, 2012 Share Posted September 15, 2012 Hamhuis is better than Bieksa 8 days a week! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sthebest Posted September 15, 2012 Share Posted September 15, 2012 mason raymond should atleast be 210 pounds of hard hitting muscle before the season starts in the 2013/2014 season Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WHL rocks Posted September 15, 2012 Share Posted September 15, 2012 Hamhuis has been our best Dman over the past two years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanucksSayEh Posted September 15, 2012 Share Posted September 15, 2012 mason raymond should atleast be 210 pounds of hard hitting muscle before the season starts in the 2013/2014 season Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sharpshooter Posted September 15, 2012 Share Posted September 15, 2012 I'm a big Bieksa fan but I'd take Hamhuis over him in a heartbeat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raph Posted September 15, 2012 Share Posted September 15, 2012 Hamhuis playing with anyone, the other guy looks good. Bieksa playing with anyone else other than Hamhuis, Bieksa looks horrendous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sharpshooter Posted September 15, 2012 Share Posted September 15, 2012 Hammer makes players around him better - that's a defining quality between him and Bieksa. Bieksa may be stronger offensively but he is streaky. Hamhuis is often one of the guys who plays pretty well to great every night. Consistency (not saying he doesn't have his bad games) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoaltenderInterference Posted September 15, 2012 Share Posted September 15, 2012 Hamhuis hands down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.