NightHawkSniper Posted May 15, 2013 Share Posted May 15, 2013 No, that would be two righties together. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sugar baby watermelon Posted May 15, 2013 Share Posted May 15, 2013 Oh man if only Gillis reads these threads, make it happen MG, bring Gudbrandson here, jeez!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sroutley Posted May 15, 2013 Share Posted May 15, 2013 Personally I believe Luongo would be a better goalie leaving Vancouver. MG and AV have messed it all up for him here. No way he stays. As for going to Florida, I hope they find an offer someplace else because we need a better trading partner. Besides getting Luongo from Florida in the first place who else have we got from them that has helped us? Not that it would ever happen but I see Edmonton and Colorado needing a better proven goalie more than Florida right now. Mactavish wants to prove himself so who knows. Remember what happened for Roy when he went to Colorado. Imagine Luongo to Edmonton. I think Edmonton has far more to offer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bodee Posted May 15, 2013 Share Posted May 15, 2013 Oh man, that's bad. When you're talking about the safety of the players, and you can't even fix your own time clock. that's ridiculous. Does Bettman honestly think this team can sustain itself there? How many years are you going to keep this floundering franchise alive? And yea, if they're in that much financial trouble, there's no way they take Luongo unless we take a boatload of cash back. Which we can't afford to do because we've got our own cap problems to deal with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted May 15, 2013 Share Posted May 15, 2013 schroeder and ballard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tortorella's Rant Posted May 15, 2013 Share Posted May 15, 2013 No. Gudbranson is going to be better than Edler (and Florida is rebuilding so they don't need the technically better right now defenseman) and Bjugstad is too valuable for the role he'll be filling next season. Add a high pick and another roster player Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robongo Posted May 15, 2013 Share Posted May 15, 2013 Defensively and physically for sure. Offensively Maybe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Standing_Tall#37 Posted May 15, 2013 Share Posted May 15, 2013 Lou+Edler+ 1st+ pay for clock repair For Gudbranson+1st+cap dump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brocklovich Posted May 15, 2013 Share Posted May 15, 2013 ^ really not sure FLA would go for that, they are rebuilding and have the 2nd overall pick with what could potentially be a game breaking forward and a guy who could (if possible) put asses in seats in Florida. I could see something along these lines: Luongo Prospect retain portion of Luongo contract for Gudbranson 2nd or 3rd if not retaining some of Luongos salary then I could see a cap dump coming back Personally if Edler is moving MG would be smart to really target Philly as they need Dmen in the worst possible way & have a few young forwards which could make a good hockey deal for both teams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NightHawkSniper Posted May 15, 2013 Share Posted May 15, 2013 For Gudbranson?? Good luck trying to sell that to Talon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brocklovich Posted May 15, 2013 Share Posted May 15, 2013 ^ Didn't Deboerr have a hand in that indicating he had an attitude problem or wasn't good enough defensively? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MoneypuckOverlord Posted May 15, 2013 Share Posted May 15, 2013 Gudbranson aint going nowhere. Other non crazies have already mentioned that. They are not even going to let go of Kulikov, what makes you think they will trade Gudbranson for Luongo? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spoosh Posted May 15, 2013 Share Posted May 15, 2013 I'll go with no simple because the players we pick up from Florida don't perform here. Ballard and Booth are prime examples of that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Merci Posted May 15, 2013 Share Posted May 15, 2013 Trade To Florida: Edler, Schroeder To Vancouver: Gudbranson, Bjugstad Does that seem fair? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canuck Surfer Posted May 16, 2013 Share Posted May 16, 2013 Bjugstad is pretty highly regarded as a prospect; Goodbranson was even more highly touted and has 2 years NHL under his belt. Considering contract value's; Edler and Lou is probably the opposite, not attractive enough? I believe in using Edler to help dissolve our cap dilemna with Lou. Together they are $8.9 mill off this years cap, plus flushing Ballard is $13.2. $15.7 with Malhotra & $17.8 with Raymond in cap relief. It will leave us with money to spend. I'd be thrilled with one exciting young player, but a truly exciting one considering we're giving up two guys with all star credentials. Then spend the roughly $4 mill we have left after Tanev gets a small raise and we fill in our roster with replacements or returnee's for guys such as Weise, Raymond, Malhotra etc. Edler can get far far more Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nitwitt Posted May 16, 2013 Share Posted May 16, 2013 Trade To Florida: Edler, Schroeder To Vancouver: Gudbranson, Bjugstad Does that seem fair? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.