J529 Posted May 26, 2013 Share Posted May 26, 2013 http://www.theprovin...6192/story.html here haven’t been a lot of good days over at Rogers Arena lately. The best recently was the day after Alain Vigneault was fired. With closure came a sense of opportunity — and relief — as the Canucks management started moving past The Breakup with some excitement. You never would have guessed it the day Vigneault was relieved of his duties. With the mood Vancouver GM Mike Gillis was in during his press conference, he looked closer to an end than any new beginning. That was not Gillis at his best. In hindsight, he probably should have kept his Q and A to 10 minutes, instead of 25. His already challenging day was soured the minute his phone started blowing up with messages early on during a meeting with the Aquilinis. Word was already out this was going to be the day Vigneault was fired. The general manager hadn’t even finished the paperwork. He had to understand then he had been shown up. There weren’t hundreds of people who knew the final meeting was taking place. The news broke in the Montreal, where Vigneault once was a head coach. If you’re into connecting dots, this one isn’t a Brian Trainer. Of course, it should have ended better. But what’s important now is it’s over, and with that, the Canucks have countless possibilities. It starts with coaching, but doesn’t end there. Two of the hot candidates underscore a couple of different avenues the Canucks can take. On one side is Dallas Eakins, the promising AHL head who has been lathered in praise by the young Toronto Maple Leafs prospects he coached, some of whom were impactful in that first-round series with the Boston Bruins. On the other is John Stevens, a failed head coach in Philadelphia, but also someone who won a Calder Cup as a head coach and a Stanley Cup as an assistant with the L.A. Kings. Both share a quality that will be extremely important during this process. They have reputations for being great communicators. The reactions to Vigneault being fired from players came off as cold and detached, because that was the tone of the relationships they had. This isn’t to say Vigneault’s approach can’t work. And you can make the argument it did. But if you’re going to change direction — and the Canucks are in desperate need of that — this search has to be more than about what system they’re going to play. They have to find someone who can get through to some of the players. This two who should come immediately to mind are Zack Kassian and Alex Edler. If Edler isn’t traded, and the Canucks aren’t planning to do that, these two just may be the most important on the team, because of all the returning players, they have the most to gain. Each has the talent to play exponentially better than what they put out this past season. But you watch their inconsistency and mental lapses enough and you wonder if they have the had space for it. That’s what makes Stevens such an intriguing candidate. When he arrived in L.A., people were saying things about Doughty similar to what you’ve heard about Edler, and even Kassian. His commitment was questioned, and so was his roller-coaster play. Just one example was what happened before the gold-medal showdown at the 2010 Olympics. Doughty missed both team buses and was nearly late for the game. There were all sorts of obvious speculation about why he slept in. Stevens and Doughty infamously clashed early on when they began their relationship in L.A., but over time they developed a terrific and close working relationship after Doughty realized Stevens was helping him, not picking on him. The tough love has helped make Doughty a much better all-around defencemen, less prone to the wild highs and lows which once marred his game. Stevens oversees the Kings defence, and it’s a blueline which has been the NHL’s most fundamentally sound the past two post-seasons. For all the concern about the Canucks’ scoring, it often gets lost that the Vigneault era is as much about the meltdown games and firedrills as it is about the lack of goal scoring. The idea of Edler working with Stevens has to be a captivating one for the Rogers Arena brain trust. Many may also be thinking now about Keith Ballard, but he just makes too much money for the Canucks to gamble on again. They have to move on. There are those, including me, who think trading Edler is a great concept the Canucks have to explore. But it’s not their only option if you believe a new coach could do wonders for him. This idea the Canucks are paralyzed by the no-trade clauses they’ve given to nine players is nonsense. Players with no-trade clauses are dealt all the time. Before this past trade deadline, Jarome Iginla, Jay Bouwmeester, Brenden Morrow, and Ryane Clowe all moved, and they all had to waive no-trade clauses. The Canucks have lots of possibilities here. Despite opinions in some corners of the the media, the clouds have lifted over this team. They haven’t crashed down on it. Not yet, anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeNiro Posted May 26, 2013 Share Posted May 26, 2013 I can't believe this doofus keeps writing article after article about nothing. His mission is clearly to drum up hate for Gillis. It's pretty pathetic. I bet Gillis won't return any of his calls, so he's tries to get revenge by writing articles like this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J529 Posted May 26, 2013 Author Share Posted May 26, 2013 Why would Gillis even give any consideration to John Stevens? As it mentioned in the article, Stevens failed in Philly. That would be such a horrible hire. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeNiro Posted May 26, 2013 Share Posted May 26, 2013 I think Gillis specifically said that he wanted a head coah that has had success, no matter what level it's at (NHL or AHL). He'll be hiring a proven head coach not an assistant IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peaches Posted May 26, 2013 Share Posted May 26, 2013 Damn I hate Botchford. Seriously, Botchford makes CDC look like geniuses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lolwut? Posted May 26, 2013 Share Posted May 26, 2013 Soooo is it normal for supposed "professionally written" articles to have spelling and grammatical errors in them? Like, did anyone actually proofread this at some point? Or did "botch"ford just drum it up as fast as possible and hit "send" in his email client..? Man. This guy is really annoying.. Too bad us fans can't ship him out of Vancouver and have him follow some other sport like figure skating for the rest of his miserable life Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angry Goose Posted May 26, 2013 Share Posted May 26, 2013 Botchford: the guy I hate listening to yap AND seeing his ugly mug on TSN Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-DLC- Posted May 26, 2013 Share Posted May 26, 2013 I'm going to edit/correct the title: Head case - Botchford. I am tired of his drivel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J529 Posted May 26, 2013 Author Share Posted May 26, 2013 I'm going to edit/correct the title: Head case - Botchford. I am tired of his drivel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twilight Sparkle Posted May 26, 2013 Share Posted May 26, 2013 can that guy write anything new? like, not recycle the same article every day? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanKeslord17 Posted May 26, 2013 Share Posted May 26, 2013 The only headcase here is Botchford Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TOMapleLaughs Posted May 26, 2013 Share Posted May 26, 2013 Blah blah blah. Blah blah blah? No, no... Blah blah blah. Ahhhhh... Blah blah blah blah blah. Etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robongo Posted May 26, 2013 Share Posted May 26, 2013 Awful journalism as usual from botch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coconuts Posted May 26, 2013 Share Posted May 26, 2013 More Botchford garbage Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wallstreetamigo Posted May 26, 2013 Share Posted May 26, 2013 I would like to see some discussion about who the possible assistant coaches are. I mean, our last two gave us a one trick pony PP for 3 years with no adjustments and the other gave us what is probably the most expensive D in the league that looked like they would get beat by an average AHL team on a nightly basis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dazzle Posted May 26, 2013 Share Posted May 26, 2013 I like this article. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westcoasting Posted May 26, 2013 Share Posted May 26, 2013 I would like to see some discussion about who the possible assistant coaches are. I mean, our last two gave us a one trick pony PP for 3 years with no adjustments and the other gave us what is probably the most expensive D in the league that looked like they would get beat by an average AHL team on a nightly basis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wallstreetamigo Posted May 26, 2013 Share Posted May 26, 2013 The new head coach will probably be picking the assistants so until one is hired we won't know anything about assistant coaches. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gerg Posted May 26, 2013 Share Posted May 26, 2013 Why would Gillis even give any consideration to John Stevens? As it mentioned in the article, Stevens failed in Philly. That would be such a horrible hire. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gerg Posted May 26, 2013 Share Posted May 26, 2013 Gillis has hired all the assistant coaches so far and said he will be involved this time as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.