Piggy Bank Posted June 11, 2013 Share Posted June 11, 2013 Wouldn't mind seeing Kesler + Edler For Couturier + Voracek + 1st ___________________________ Could either keep that! Or flip it and go ___________________________ Luongo + Phi 1st For New Jersey 1st ^ that guarantees that you get either Jones mackinnon drouin nichushkin barkov lindholm Monahon nurse shinkaruk Or Schneider + Phi 1st For Colorado 1st = mackinnon Cap allows us to get streit or another star defense Just playin around if any of these happened what would you think? I feel they are realistic, probably wouldn't happen, but it is fair and realisitic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R3aL Posted June 11, 2013 Share Posted June 11, 2013 That trade is risky, but I feel it is fair. We would lose a second line C though and our C depth would be scary next year. As Couts might not be ready to anchor our 2nd line yet. Adding Voracek, Sean C, and Sean M would be great though. This would be a long term impact deal for us and it would not make us a better team in the short term. " He earned his first point in the NHL in his 3rd game, on October 12 against the Vancouver Canucks in a primary assist for a goal by Jakub Voracek." Kinda Ironic. Sedin-Sedin-Burrows/Voracek/Kassian Booth- ?? -Voracek/Burrows/Kassian Higgins-Cotourier-Hansen Our C position for the future would look great as Sean Monahan is going to be like Logan Couture I think 2 years after drafting or in his 3rd , Voracek is entering his prime but still young, and Sean is a year or two from breaking out Like I said risky trade would need to be followed with another trade potentially or a few signings. But it is almost like a quick rebuild as we lose a top C a top D, and add 2 potential top Cs and a top W, while keeping our draft pick as well. Interesting though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
c00kies Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 I wouldn't mind that first deal, but we'd need some more insurance at center. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 Can we stop trying to trade Kesler? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piggy Bank Posted June 12, 2013 Author Share Posted June 12, 2013 I also feel if we made the Colorado deal, mackinnon would play 2nd line center, he is your and in experienced, but most people that go that high take a second line role, and i think he would learn fast under captain hank Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Specter's Vengeance Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 This isnt for you specifically... but... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pylon05 Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 These trades are risky; but if MG could pull his head out of his !@# he could see that he has the assets to pull this off. Only thing though. If we get Couturier and Voracek I think you make Jensen and Gaunce trade assets and could probably use the one or both of them instead of Schnieder and still get the 1st from Colorado. Than either keep Schnieds or try to trade him plus someone else to maybe get another pick in the top 5-8 One other thing. We would need Kesler to waive his NTC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apples Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 That Flyers trade is really an overpayment. rather keep Kesler Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.