naslund.is.king Posted July 7, 2013 Share Posted July 7, 2013 http://www.theprovince.com/touch/story.html?id=8625957 Many offseason questions surrounding the Vancouver Canucks have been answered by now. They have their new coach, and a couple of new centres after signing Brad Richardson and Mike Santorelli on the weekend. But there is no answer yet to what Roberto Luongo will do next. People, including Vancouver management, can speculate. But they’re guessing with the rest of us. Luongo hasn’t revealed his intentions, even refusing hockey-related interviews as he prepares for the World Series of Poker, continuing his sponsorship deal with the BCLC. It’s left the Canucks twisting in the wind just a little. Most believe the goalie who desperately wanted a fresh start will report for training camp in Vancouver. In fact, GM Mike Gillis starkly outlined Luongo’s options Friday. “Play or not play,” Gillis said. Is that blunt enough for you? He can play for the Canucks, or he can sit out, turning his back on a contract that’s still worth $40.5 million over the next nine years. Gillis will travel to Florida to explain to Luongo what most know by now. His contract was unmovable. A big reason why is he, and the Canucks, essentially got screwed by the CBA. When the new agreement was ratified it included a so-called Luongo Rule, a way of penalizing teams who circumvented the cap with those mega long-term deals. With cap penalties tacked on near end of those deals, after the player retires, it made Luongo’s contract as appealing as a pine beetle infestation. “I have the utmost respect for this guy,” Gillis said of Luongo. “I think he’s a fantastic person. He’s done tons in the community here. “Situations happen in professional sports and we have to learn how to deal with them.” That is going to take some time. What Gillis probably won’t be able to sell Luongo on are any noticeable improvements to his club. He still has a chance to alter the dynamic of the team by trading away one of the Canucks top four defencemen. The Canucks have continued to listen to offers for Alex Edler, and maybe even Kevin Bieksa. This, even after the Keith Ballard buyout. With their no-trade clauses, it will be difficult to find the right deal. But one can’t help but wonder whether the arrival of John Tortorella has greased the path for players to waive their NTCs to get out of Vancouver. Until a trade drops, however, the cap-strapped Canucks can only boast about bringing in two depth centres, and a depth defenceman in Yannick Weber. By signing free agents Santorelli, Richardson and Weber, they have managed to replace Andrew Ebbett, Max Lapierre and Cam Barker. Hands up if you think that qualifies as a “reset.” Even if those acquisitions are upgrades, the Canucks roster is not definitively better now than it was at then end of the season. You can make the argument with Derek Roy gone, it’s worse. Then again, what exactly did Roy do in Vancouver? Richardson, who joins Vancouver on a two-year $2.3 million contract, was told he’d have every chance to be the team’s third-line centre. “That was a big thing,” Richardson said. “Getting there and sitting down with them and seeing that role could be the third-line centre. I thought that was going to be a great fit for me.” It’s a hole the Canucks haven’t filled adequately since Manny Malhotra’s eye injury. Richardson will be in tough to hold that job all year, and the Canucks are hoping now one of their prospects earns it by the end of the season. Richardson is a nice utility player and he could flourish for a while with an expanded role. But he could easily find himself out of his depth if he’s playing consistently in the top nine. He was a healthy scratch in 27 of the LA Kings first 29 games this past season and played just 16 games in all. “It was really tough,” Richardson said. “They didn’t give me a whole lot of feed back on why I wasn’t playing, which was tough. “At the end of the year, it turned around. I started playing and played well.” Santorelli, 27, is from Vancouver and said he signed a two-way deal with the Canucks, with a $550,000 NHL cap hit, to re-establish his career. In 2010-11 Santorelli put up 20 goals and 21 assists on a line with David Booth in Florida. At least Santorelli is a shootout specialist, something the Canucks lacked last season. In his NHL career, he’s 10-for-20 in the skills competition for a deadly 50% success rate. That’s at least some news which could make Luongo smile. He strikes again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PlayStation Posted July 7, 2013 Share Posted July 7, 2013 I love chirping him on twitter. He is so annoying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
naslund.is.king Posted July 7, 2013 Author Share Posted July 7, 2013 His work's,"appealing as a pine beetle infestation." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShakyWalton Posted July 7, 2013 Share Posted July 7, 2013 I agree only with Botches statment.."What Gillis probably won’t be able to sell Luongo on are any noticeable improvements to his club." So obvious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brownky Posted July 7, 2013 Share Posted July 7, 2013 the O in "bOtch" in his name is a single typo away from outing what he really is. Adjacent letters too. Bptch. Definitely a bptch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baggins Posted July 7, 2013 Share Posted July 7, 2013 Best line in the article.... Hands up if you think that qualifies as a “reset.” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neversummer Posted July 7, 2013 Share Posted July 7, 2013 No offense to OP but could people who bitch about Botch's writing stop reprinting Botch's article? It just perpetuates and fuels his readership ... it is resulting in the opposite result. In fact, please everyone stop reposting Vancouver Province/Sun articles. Hands up (or +1) if you agree? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Batmania Posted July 7, 2013 Share Posted July 7, 2013 No offense to OP but could people who bitch about Botch's writing stop reprinting Botch's article? It just perpetuates and fuels his readership ... it is resulting in the opposite result. In fact, please everyone stop reposting Vancouver Province/Sun articles. Hands up (or +1) if you agree? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lockhart Posted July 7, 2013 Share Posted July 7, 2013 Aren't Botch and Lu supposed to be pretty close? You would think Botch would quit stirring the pot then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pimpcurtly Posted July 7, 2013 Share Posted July 7, 2013 No offense to OP but could people who bitch about Botch's writing stop reprinting Botch's article? It just perpetuates and fuels his readership ... it is resulting in the opposite result. In fact, please everyone stop reposting Vancouver Province/Sun articles. Hands up (or +1) if you agree? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TOMapleLaughs Posted July 7, 2013 Share Posted July 7, 2013 Honestly, I find it hilarious. Back in 2011 when the team was almost perfect and the writers had very little to criticize, we didn't hear any of this hate. Now that the team has holes and there are some obvious issues with management...people just can't handle it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
naslund.is.king Posted July 7, 2013 Author Share Posted July 7, 2013 No offense to OP but could people who bitch about Botch's writing stop reprinting Botch's article? It just perpetuates and fuels his readership ... it is resulting in the opposite result. In fact, please everyone stop reposting Vancouver Province/Sun articles. Hands up (or +1) if you agree? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gurn Posted July 7, 2013 Share Posted July 7, 2013 People give Botch crap- but they read his stuff thus Botch keeps his job and writes more stuff. Anyone else see a pattern here? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SamJamIam Posted July 7, 2013 Share Posted July 7, 2013 Oh Botch. More of the same. Does he look in the mirror and go "Haha! I just need to write the same old crap again and I'll get paid. Vancouver is full of idiots!" or does he think "WHAT AM I DOING WITH MY LIFE?!" I lean towards the former myself but only because I think the latter would require a level of self-awareness which, if Botch possessed it, would drive him to insanity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cromeslab Posted July 7, 2013 Share Posted July 7, 2013 Here's an idea LOCK THESE TYPE OF THREADS!!ITS TROLLING FFS!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jai604 Posted July 7, 2013 Share Posted July 7, 2013 Any time I see "Botchford" I don't even bother clicking the link or reading the article. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kodos Posted July 7, 2013 Share Posted July 7, 2013 No offense to OP but could people who bitch about Botch's writing stop reprinting Botch's article? It just perpetuates and fuels his readership ... it is resulting in the opposite result. In fact, please everyone stop reposting Vancouver Province/Sun articles. Hands up (or +1) if you agree? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Batmania Posted July 7, 2013 Share Posted July 7, 2013 Are you honestly asking people to stop discussing the sports media content for their favourite team? Don't be dumb. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Industrious1 Posted July 7, 2013 Share Posted July 7, 2013 People get so angry at other people's opinions....on a forum. Internets is serious business. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Dasein Posted July 7, 2013 Share Posted July 7, 2013 How his job security isn't in limbo surprises me. Garbage writer if I ever saw one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.