Ron Swansons Moustache Posted July 8, 2013 Share Posted July 8, 2013 Hopefully Gillis goes for O' Byrne over Fistric. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JE14 Posted July 8, 2013 Share Posted July 8, 2013 Yes they would Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apple Juice Posted July 8, 2013 Share Posted July 8, 2013 Wasn't Fistric also a Giant? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apple Juice Posted July 8, 2013 Share Posted July 8, 2013 Nonis' best offer to Fraser was 750,000 on a two way deal. Fraser then filed for arbitration in hopes of getting a fair deal. If you sent an offer sheet of 1.1 million for one/two years I doubt Nonis would be able to accept due to his cap troubles already (has to sign Kadri and I think Franson(might be a different D)). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted July 8, 2013 Share Posted July 8, 2013 Only thing is he's a lefty but we've already got Weber so that wouldn't matter. 6'2 233lbs so he's a big body Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CookieCrumbs Posted July 8, 2013 Share Posted July 8, 2013 I would be pumped on Fistric. Guy LAYS people out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TOMapleLaughs Posted July 8, 2013 Share Posted July 8, 2013 Both players make mistakes. Fister is bigger and slower and has no offensive upside. But we need some LH help now. Blum's another RH. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billabong Posted July 8, 2013 Share Posted July 8, 2013 I don't really know where he prices himself and where the Canucks price him for that matter but I'd say anywhere in the 1-1.5m on a 1-2 year deal should be accurate Not surprised the Canucks are out on Blum because after the weber signing that kinda took his spot and with corrado on the cusp...disappointed, but not surprised Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RonMexico Posted July 8, 2013 Share Posted July 8, 2013 There is a reason why these two guys are free agents. They aren't that good. Blum looks to be about as useful as Gragnani was. Fistric isn't even close to an upgrade over Alberts. Let other teams garbage rot in the pile. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apple Juice Posted July 8, 2013 Share Posted July 8, 2013 There is a reason why these two guys are free agents. They aren't that good. Blum looks to be about as useful as Gragnani was. Fistric isn't even close to an upgrade over Alberts. Let other teams garbage rot in the pile. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lipschitz Posted July 8, 2013 Share Posted July 8, 2013 While I agree that O'Byrne is a better player than Fistric, O'Byrne will be looking for a 2-3 million dollar contract whereas Fistric would cost 1 million or less I would think. The struggles of a salary capped world. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
n00bxQb Posted July 8, 2013 Share Posted July 8, 2013 Fistric = Alberts What is the point of having two of Andrew Alberts? I'd rather have Blum than Fistric, personally. At least Blum adds a different element and a right-handed shot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edlerberry Posted July 8, 2013 Share Posted July 8, 2013 RLY wish we got Blum Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R3aL Posted July 8, 2013 Share Posted July 8, 2013 This is all you need to know. There are so many more videos. He CRUNCHES the biggest guys in hockey all the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanGnome Posted July 8, 2013 Share Posted July 8, 2013 Three of those were really late hits and the one on Thornton was almost from behind/a dive by Thornton. 4/5 are penalties if he plays for the Canucks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mpt Posted July 8, 2013 Share Posted July 8, 2013 Fistric = Alberts What is the point of having two of Andrew Alberts? I'd rather have Blum than Fistric, personally. At least Blum adds a different element and a right-handed shot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timberz21 Posted July 8, 2013 Share Posted July 8, 2013 Fistric = Alberts What is the point of having two of Andrew Alberts? I'd rather have Blum than Fistric, personally. At least Blum adds a different element and a right-handed shot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Connauton Posted July 8, 2013 Share Posted July 8, 2013 Third pairing with Tanev: Hamhuis, Bieksa Edler, Garrison Fistric, Tanev Weber Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
riffraff Posted July 8, 2013 Share Posted July 8, 2013 This years vandermeer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rypien37 Posted July 8, 2013 Share Posted July 8, 2013 Fistric = Alberts What is the point of having two of Andrew Alberts? I'd rather have Blum than Fistric, personally. At least Blum adds a different element and a right-handed shot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.