Cucumber Posted July 18, 2013 Share Posted July 18, 2013 Van Jared boll 3rd 2014 Cbj hansen Canucks get a hard hitting 4liner RW for just a little less then hansen salary and a low level prospect they get a top 9 winger for a very cheap salary Reasons for this: Gillis has said repeatedly that we need youth and to get bigger. I LOVE hansen he one of my favs canucks but he doesn't have enough skill for top 6 and not big enough for bottom 6th. with this we jensen who cheaper then hansen and he younger + bigger. i feel hansen might become the next raymond. we also get boll for our 4th line. sedins kassian booth/burrows kesler higgins booth/burrows gaunce.schoeder jensen weise richardson boll Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kazmanian Devil Posted July 18, 2013 Share Posted July 18, 2013 Van Jared boll Spencer Machacek Cbj hansen Canucks get a hard hitting 4liner RW for just a little less then hansen salary and a low level prospect they get a top 9 winger for a very cheap salary Reasons for this: Gillis has said repeatedly that we need youth and to get bigger. I LOVE hansen he one of my favs canucks but he doesn't have enough skill for top 6 and not big enough for bottom 6th. with this we jensen who cheaper then hansen and he younger + bigger. i feel hansen might become the next raymond. we also get boll for our 4th line. sedins kassian booth/burrows kesler higgins booth/burrows gaunce.schoeder jensen weise richardson boll Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drouin Posted July 18, 2013 Share Posted July 18, 2013 I'd rather keep Hansen. Versatile player who can move up and down the lineup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted July 18, 2013 Share Posted July 18, 2013 Two people like Hansen in your top 9 or even bottom 6 will win you a cup based on their efforts and heart alone if the rest of the team is working. Keeping Hansen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted July 18, 2013 Share Posted July 18, 2013 This was not very well thought out. Hansen >> Boll Hansen >>>>>>>>> Macachek Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted July 18, 2013 Share Posted July 18, 2013 Double Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pavel Burrows Posted July 18, 2013 Share Posted July 18, 2013 Terrrrrrrrrible!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanucksFanMike Posted July 18, 2013 Share Posted July 18, 2013 You're right, this is a minor trade that could make a major difference..... a major negative difference! Honey Badger should be going nowhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canucks#01fan Posted July 20, 2013 Share Posted July 20, 2013 You are underrating hansens value Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evil Roach Posted July 20, 2013 Share Posted July 20, 2013 But Hansen is honey badger Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
мeтpо Posted July 20, 2013 Share Posted July 20, 2013 I wouldn't trade Hansen ever. Hopefully he's a career Canuck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex Burrows 14 Posted July 20, 2013 Share Posted July 20, 2013 That doesn't even make sense. Hansen is defensively sound, works his ass off every night, and puts up solid numbers from the 3rd line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hunter Horvat Posted July 21, 2013 Share Posted July 21, 2013 Hansen is too underrated. Plays his heart and soul out every single game. I agree with the other proposal though, Weise and a 3rd for Boll. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Papayas Posted July 21, 2013 Share Posted July 21, 2013 Trading Hansen is a minor trade? You need to stay away from the main forum Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uber_pwnzor Posted July 21, 2013 Share Posted July 21, 2013 You just don't trade the honey badger. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uber_pwnzor Posted July 21, 2013 Share Posted July 21, 2013 For the record, so was raymond. He was all of that. As for the proposal, no. Swap hansen for weise. Weise and a 3rd for Boll. Id do it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bloodyknukles Posted July 21, 2013 Share Posted July 21, 2013 getting Boll is great. i would try other options/ tradeables before letting hansen go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dogbyte Posted July 22, 2013 Share Posted July 22, 2013 Raymond also broke his back playing for us... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uber_pwnzor Posted July 23, 2013 Share Posted July 23, 2013 And that has relevance how, and to who? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ilya Mikheyev Posted July 23, 2013 Share Posted July 23, 2013 Uhhhh. Boll would be a great 4th liner, sure. But Jannik Hansen has proven to be an unreal forechecker, PKer, defensive forward with 40+ point potential. Plus, he's all effort, all the time. Boll is a huge downgrade from Hansen, and considering the Canucks are hoping to be contenders this deal makes zero sense for them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.