kacholu Posted July 19, 2013 Share Posted July 19, 2013 I'm still confused on what the cap implications are if lui was to retire early. Can someone please answer that for me? Also, what if he traded away after a couple of seasons? Do we still get hit regarding the cap? What if he pulls a Kovi and comes back after a year? What will be the cap? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Where's Wellwood Posted July 19, 2013 Share Posted July 19, 2013 The penalty we take if he retires with us and is never traded is detailed here /topic/347482-cap-penalty-because-of-the-luongo-rule/">http://forum.canucks.com/topic/347482-cap-penalty-because-of-the-luongo-rule/ Because there are so many scenarios possible with trades, you can play around with different teams and such here but yes, we do still get hit with a penalty. http://www.capgeek.com/recapture-calculator/ I don`t think you can return to the NHL after retirement for at least 3 years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Primus099 Posted July 19, 2013 Share Posted July 19, 2013 yep, we get hit with an $825,000+ penalty if he retires Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kacholu Posted July 19, 2013 Author Share Posted July 19, 2013 Thanks for the help guys. Makes a lot of sense now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S.Mouse! Posted July 19, 2013 Share Posted July 19, 2013 Thanks for the help guys. Makes a lot of sense now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJDDawg Posted July 19, 2013 Share Posted July 19, 2013 If he pulled a Kovy, as I understand it, he couldn't come back within three years without the approval of all 29 other clubs. After 3 years he doesn't need that approval and is essentially a free agent. Retirement voids his contract but the Canucks will still be on the hook for the cap savings they derived for the first three years of the deal, spread evenly over the next 18 years. I think it turns out to be around a $250K per year cap hit so not that bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TACIC Posted July 19, 2013 Share Posted July 19, 2013 It's a stupid rule that only affects the Lupngo deal if I'm correct cause the other ones that are affected wont fall under the rule if I remember correctly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.