Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

Can it be done? Can Israel and Palestine finally co exist on an agreed upon border?


Recommended Posts

US promises Israel Pre-1967 borders as basis for negotiations. Senator John Kerry has written a letter to Abbas guaranteeing this point in order to drag Abbas to the negotiating table.

JERUSALEM — Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas agreed to resume peace talks with Israel only after U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry gave him a letter guaranteeing that the basis of the negotiations will be Israel’s pre-1967 borders, two senior Palestinian officials said Saturday.

The officials, both of whom are close to the Palestinian leader and privy to internal discussions, said the U.S. letter also stipulated that both sides are to refrain from taking any steps that would jeopardize the outcome of the talks. Israel is not to issue new tenders for Jewish settlements in the West Bank, while the Palestinians are not to pursue diplomatic action against Israel at any international organizations, the officials said on condition of anonymity because they are not authorized to brief the media.

“The talks with Kerry were about to collapse, and the letter came as a lifeline in the last minute bargaining,” one of the Palestinian officials said.

There was no immediate comment from the State Department.


After intense shuttle diplomacy, Kerry announced on Friday that Israel and the Palestinians had agreed on a basis for returning to the peace process, which broke down five years ago. The two sides are to meet — likely in the coming week — to work out final details on actually resuming their negotiations on the toughest issues of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Kerry would not give details on the agreement on the negotiations’ framework. “The best way to give these negotiations a chance is to keep them private.” he said. “We know that the challenges require some very tough choices in the days ahead. Today, however, I am hopeful.”

The Palestinians long refused to return to the negotiating table unless Israel agreed to several preconditions, including that the talks be based on Israel’s borders before the 1967 Mideast war, when Israel captured the Gaza Strip, West Bank and east Jerusalem. Israel frequently called for talks to resume without preconditions, insisting that all core issues should be resolved through dialogue.

Speculation has been rife for weeks that the sides would find a way to sidestep Israel’s reluctance to offer assurances of its pre-1967 borders as the framework for talks by having the guarantee provided by the United States.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu faces sharp opposition from within his majority coalition to such a move. One key ally, Economics Minister Naftali Bennett, has threatened to pull his Jewish Home Party out of the government altogether if the prime minister agrees to the border conditions.

The basis of the negotiations themselves — not even the core issues at the heart of the conflict — has been a major impediment to resuming talks. On Thursday evening, the Palestinian leadership balked at dropping a main condition: They demand a guarantee that negotiations on borders between a Palestinian state and Israel would be based on the cease-fire line that held from 1949 until the 1967 war.

‘This is a very heavy responsibility,” Livni told Israel’s Channel 2 TV of the talks. “All the issues will be on the table’

Kerry’s announcement late Friday suggested that the question had been resolved, although Kerry offered no details and said the “best way to give these negotiations a chance is to keep them private.”

Netanyahu issued a statement Saturday evening welcoming Kerry’s announcement and thanking him for his efforts, saying he “views the resumption of the political process at this time a vital strategic interest.”

Earlier Saturday, Israel’s intelligence and strategic affairs minister offered a few details on the framework. He confirmed that Israel would release some Palestinian prisoners, but said it will not meet other long-standing Palestinian demands before negotiations resume, such as a settlement freeze or defining the 1967 borders as the basis for talks.

Yuval Steinitz told Israel Radio that prisoners Israel has agreed to release include some who “have been sitting in jail for dozens of years,” He did not say how many would be freed, adding only that they would be released in phases.

The fate of the prisoners is extremely sensitive in Palestinian society. After decades of fighting Israel, many families have had a member imprisoned and the release of prisoners has been a longstanding demand. The Palestinians are held on a range of charges, from rock throwing to deadly assaults like shooting attacks or bombings targeting Israeli soldiers and civilians. The Palestinians mostly view the prisoners as heroes while Israelis tend to see them as terrorists.

In a sign of the opposition Netanyahu faces even within his own government, deputy defence minister Danny Danon issued a statement condemning the prisoner release, saying “these murderers must not be released as an ’act of good will’ or as a prize for returning to the negotiating table.”

Steinitz said it a nine-month timetable was agreed to for the talks to prevent them from collapsing along the way. He also said the Palestinians agreed to refrain from taking action against Israel at the United Nations while the talks are taking place.

Israel’s chief negotiator with the Palestinians, Tzipi Livni, welcomed the revival of the peace process but said Saturday she was not allowed to relay any details.

“This is a very heavy responsibility,” Livni told Israel’s Channel 2 TV of the talks. “All the issues will be on the table.”

She said it was difficult to restart talks after years of mistrust between the sides, but that she is “hopeful” about them.

Final status negotiations aim to reach a deal on the core issues of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, including Jerusalem, borders, the fate of Palestinian refugees and security arrangements. Talks ground to a halt five years ago, and previous efforts to revive them have stalled, particularly over Palestinian demands that Israel announce a freeze in construction of Jewish settlements in the West Bank and east Jerusalem, which they claim as part of a future state along with Gaza. Israel withdrew from Gaza in 2005.

In Gaza, Hamas spokesman Sami Abu Zuhri said his group rejects Kerry’s announcement, saying it does not recognize Abbas’ “legitimacy to negotiate” on their behalf.

Palestinian official Ahmed Majdalani said on Friday that Kerry had assured the Palestinians that Israel would free some 350 prisoners gradually in the coming months. The prisoners would include some 100 men that Israel convicted of crimes committed before interim peace accords were signed in 1993.

Majdalani also said Kerry would endorse the 1967 lines as the starting point of negotiations.

The Associated Press

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I say Palestinians should just barge into Special Ed's house, toss him and his family out and take it over.

He'll be fine with it since what's done is done and there's no need to disturb the new residents.

Special Ed will be in no position to negotiate and he will just have to make do with what he has. The end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe the only hope for a peaceful resolution to the conflict lies in the hands of the Palestinian and Israeli people themselves , not the politicians and supposed peacemakers from other countries. It takes people who can see past their pain and resist the urge to continue the circle of hatred , people like this guy , instead of being consumed by hatred for the people who killed his son he is dong something positive to bring people together so that maybe fathers on both sides of this conflict might one day not have to suffer the same pain he has losing his son

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure how peace in the region can be attained now when they're currently in a state of war and have been for centuries.

Not sure why Isreal or Palestine would concede now when both sides think it's all theirs.

It would be nice if they could just live in an integrated society, but instead walls are going up.

It would be nice if Isreal would agree on a border, but they'd just 'settle' outside it.

It would be nice if Arabs and Jews could just 'get along', but they are fundamentally opposed to one another.

Good luck, Kerry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually native Americans have more right to claim my house than Palestinians. But too bad for them because its a new generation and I had nothing to do with the past. Too bad suck it up and make the best of what you have now. I can go back far enough that every land is stolen welcome to the world we live in. Cry me a river and let that tiny violin play on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If a land is stolen from them, they can steal it back...why not? The past and the present are linked, so you can't say that whatever happened in the past is the past and should be forgotten. Just because World War I and II happened in the past, it doesn't mean that World War III won't happen. History can repeat itself over and over again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So far to date in 2013 Israel would have received approximately received $1.7 Billion in aid compared to the approximately $200 million Palestinians have received.

When we look at the disparity of the population of Israelis VS. Palestinians, this becomes even more outrageous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Create New...