Franz Liszt Posted August 3, 2013 Share Posted August 3, 2013 For the record, I WANT TO KEEP TANEV! I ALSO WANT TO KEEP EDLER! I'm just doing what GMMG says in "looking at all options". To PHI: Chris Tanev (RFA), VAN 2014 1st + VAN 2015 3rd To VAN: Braydon Coburn & Matt Read Tanev + 3rd = Coburn 1st = Read THEN, for cap space, while improving the team To OTT: Alex Edler, David Booth + VAN 2015 2nd To VAN: Patrick Wiercioch, Cory Conacher, Colin Greening & Mark Stone Edler = Wiercioch, Conacher & Stone Booth + 2nd = Greening THEN To TOR: Adam Polasek + VAN 2014 2nd To VAN: Cody Franson (RFA) THEN Sign Mark Fistric to 1 year @ $1 million. CANUCKS ROSTER Daniel Sedin - Henrik Sedin - Zack Kassian -------------------- 22 - 33 - 9 Alex Burrows - Ryan Kesler - Cory Conacher ------------------ 14 - 17 - 13 Colin Greening - Jordan Schroeder - Matt Read -------------- 13 - 45 - 24 Chris Higgins - Brad Richardson - Jannik Hansen ------------ 20 - 15 - 36 Tom Sestito, Dale Weise ---------------------------------------------- 29, 32 Dan Hamhuis - Kevin Bieksa ------------------------------------------ 2 - 3 Jason Garrison - Cody Franson -------------------------------------- 5 - 4 Braydon Coburn - Patrick Wiercioch---------------------------------- 7 - 6 Mark Fistric, Yannick Weber ------------------------------------------ 25, 18 Roberto Luongo & Eddie Läck -------------------------------------- 1 & 31 Quick summary, line by line: 1st Line: The Sedin twins are accompanied by a young, intimidating and improving power forward who's got their backs. 2nd Line: Kesler and Burrows provide the defensive presence while being able to score quite often as well. Conacher gives them a shifty, speedy playmaker. 3rd Line: Speed is what you get with this line, while being secondary scoring to the top two lines. 4th Line: Acts as another 3rd line, when injuries occur, these guys can step it up. 13th & 14th forwards: Toughness and grittiness from these two. Can step in when injury happens or when playing a bigger team. 1st D-pair: We all know what we get from Hammer & Juice. They were ranked in the top-3 for best D-pairings 2 seasons ago. 2nd D-pair: Has some offensive pop. They would instantly become out top PP unit guys on the points. 3rd D-pair: Two monster guys at 6'5 who love to hit. One can provide lots of defense and the other lots of offense. 7th & 8th D-men: Fistric can be brought in against tougher teams, while Y. Weber can play against other teams, and both fill in incase of injury. Goalies: We can only hope Roberto will come back strong (or come back at all), which I think he will. Läck will do a great job backing up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted August 3, 2013 Share Posted August 3, 2013 Gotta stop throwing Booth in trade proposals as right now he's less value than Tanev unfortunately. Won't comment on the ideas themselves except to say there's a few names i'd give my neighbours left testicle to see wear the C Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peace Bond Posted August 3, 2013 Share Posted August 3, 2013 Gotta stop throwing Booth in trade proposals as right now he's less value than Tanev unfortunately. Won't comment on the ideas themselves except to say there's a few names i'd give my neighbours left testicle to see wear the C Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kazmanian Devil Posted August 3, 2013 Share Posted August 3, 2013 Excellent use of capital letters. Really grabbed my attention and drove your points home. Now I'll never forget that you want to keep Tanev and Edler. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted August 3, 2013 Share Posted August 3, 2013 lolwut Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanKeslord17 Posted August 3, 2013 Share Posted August 3, 2013 I wouldn't give my own, that would just be silly. Just slip over to my neighbours while he's sleeping and say Holmgren or Murray, here this is for you now make the trade Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted August 3, 2013 Share Posted August 3, 2013 You have a very big imagination Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted August 3, 2013 Share Posted August 3, 2013 I love Tanev but we get Coburn as a replacement/upgrade AND Read? Yes please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drouin Posted August 3, 2013 Share Posted August 3, 2013 Keep Booth Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Franz Liszt Posted August 3, 2013 Author Share Posted August 3, 2013 Gotta stop throwing Booth in trade proposals as right now he's less value than Tanev unfortunately. Won't comment on the ideas themselves except to say there's a few names i'd give my neighbours left testicle to see wear the C Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kanucks25 Posted August 4, 2013 Share Posted August 4, 2013 Philly wants to contend now. Why would they trade solid roster players that they need for draft picks and a young #5/6 D-man? Not even gonna touch the Ottawa trade... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canucks#01fan Posted August 4, 2013 Share Posted August 4, 2013 We need to stop trading draft picks like they're peanuts. Our prospect pool isnt that great. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Franz Liszt Posted August 4, 2013 Author Share Posted August 4, 2013 Philly wants to contend now. Why would they trade solid roster players that they need for draft picks and a young #5/6 D-man? Not even gonna touch the Ottawa trade... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kanucks25 Posted August 4, 2013 Share Posted August 4, 2013 Myself along with many others take your opinion with a grain of salt or don't care at all, ever since Raymond, Ballard & Schneider for Perry... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Franz Liszt Posted August 4, 2013 Author Share Posted August 4, 2013 Still mad, I see. Regardless, just because you don't value my opinion doesn't mean your proposal is any less terrible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kanucks25 Posted August 5, 2013 Share Posted August 5, 2013 Exactly another reason why we don't care for your opinion, because you think everyone's proposals are terrible. You should make your own and see how bad yours are. You gotta lighten up man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigpush Posted August 5, 2013 Share Posted August 5, 2013 How is our RFA (Tanev) and 2 picks worth two solid players ( Coburn and Read) Coburn is Philly's top Defenseman......and Read has scored 71 points in his first 121 games in the league as well as being a + player on pretty bad philly teams. But Toronto's RFA (Franson) is only worth a low end prospect and a 2nd? Ottawa Trade makes no sense either as we pick up 3 relativly unknowns in Wiercioch, Conachar and Stone and a 3rd/4th liner for a top 2 dman on most teams and a 2nd/3rd liner. I think Greening is an excellent role player and I would guess that Wiercioch becomes a regular NHLer, Conachar needs to overcome his lack of size (5'8") every time he gets onto the ice and very few guys historically have been able to do that year in and year out and Stone is a quality prospect. It is too risky IMO to be acquiring potential for what Edler has already proven to bring and Booth while healthy is capable of. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canada Hockey Place Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 If Tanev had to be traded, I'd probably do something like: TBL: Tanev VAN: Connolly then sign O'Byrne to plug that hole. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EagleShield Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 I thought this might happen and was in a way hoping for someone to offer sheet him at the 1st round pick level. If he really doesn't want to be here, or an agreement will not be reached, then trade him for a second round pick. He gets arbitration next year, and they'll just say that he should get $1.25m, so I think there's a chance that Tanev is overvaluing himself. Either that or GMMG is aware that Tanev is crap out of options and is taking care of all the other business first... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigpush Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 If Tanev had to be traded, I'd probably do something like: TBL: Tanev VAN: Connolly then sign O'Byrne to plug that hole. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.