Carl's Jn Posted August 17, 2013 Share Posted August 17, 2013 I'd rather have Murray at 2 mil, over Alberts at 1 mil... But that's just me though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carl's Jn Posted August 17, 2013 Share Posted August 17, 2013 Did Booth piss in your cheerios, convert you girlfriend to Christianity, or burn your house down? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Absent Canuck Posted August 17, 2013 Share Posted August 17, 2013 I say we re sign Alberts but I guess Gillis would have already if he wanted to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monteeun Posted August 17, 2013 Share Posted August 17, 2013 i have to agree with the other guy on booth. booth has become injury prone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimmyking8888 Posted August 17, 2013 Share Posted August 17, 2013 If Alberts is that good, somebody would have signed him already. Come on people, use your head. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edlerberry Posted August 17, 2013 Share Posted August 17, 2013 we are done with him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nino Posted August 17, 2013 Share Posted August 17, 2013 I guess I was watching a different Alberts then you guys. All I remember is Alberts getting benched alot after directly causing more goals for the opposition then any other Canuck. I would be amazed if an NHL team picked him up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WiDeN Posted August 17, 2013 Share Posted August 17, 2013 Fistric was very under whelming in Edmonton last year. I would rather have Alberts on the roster. I wonder what the price difference between he and Murray would be. I also wonder which guy Tortorella would rather have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WiDeN Posted August 17, 2013 Share Posted August 17, 2013 If Alberts is that good, somebody would have signed him already. Come on people, use your head. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamesB Posted August 19, 2013 Share Posted August 19, 2013 Baring trades and assuming Tanev is signed, the Canucks have room for at most one veteran defenceman and he has to be cheap -- mkuch cheaper than Alberts was last yeat. Alberts did a decent job last year but there are several guys out there who would probably be an upgrade. MG is probably waiting until the end of summer when unsigned UFAs will start to get desparate and will probably pick up the best available guy who will sign for a low salary. Than could be Alberts. Most other teams are either at or close to the cap or have a pretty full roster or would rather play young guys. There is some chance Alberts falls through the cracks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Team Bagues Posted August 19, 2013 Share Posted August 19, 2013 We're better off without him. He's worse than Dana Murzyn was in his prime. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Bookie Posted August 19, 2013 Share Posted August 19, 2013 Little thing called the cap. I'm not sure where we stand cap wise but i'm pretty sure we are rubbing dimes together lookin' for that golden dollar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.