Lockout Casualty Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 Do nothing USA gets Blamed, intervene with Force USA gets blamed for warmongering invading muslim lands. So let's just sit back and watch the war on LL for entertainment. everyone wins. Does not matter what The USA and it's allies do Muslims will always kill each other over a pedophile prophet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kurtis Posted August 23, 2013 Share Posted August 23, 2013 Why would Syria use them when they are in the process of winning the war.... Not to mention it goes hand and hand with the UN inspectors arriving in Syria. Also it's a known fact the FSA have staged stuff like this before... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kurtis Posted August 23, 2013 Share Posted August 23, 2013 SAA wouldn't do this to it's own people. If anyone has been watching LL, it shows every time they Liberate a town/city, it goes back to rebuilding stage / normal. When FSA control a town, it's gone to shat. Looting, mass execution ect ect. I can't wait for Syria to win this war. It will be and is a lot better off with Assad then extremists who will turn the country back 1000 years and massicure the whole kurdish and Christian population... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buddhas Hand Posted August 23, 2013 Share Posted August 23, 2013 We did? I don't recall that. In fact, Iraq was one action where we as a country didn't follow the Americans' lead... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
key2thecup Posted August 27, 2013 Share Posted August 27, 2013 There now being called possessors of "WMDs" .... uh oh I'm sure we remember last time. 9% of US approves striking Syria according to a poll..... I predict we'll still see it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
It's a process Posted August 27, 2013 Share Posted August 27, 2013 There now being called possessors of "WMDs" .... uh oh I'm sure we remember last time. 9% of US approves striking Syria according to a poll..... I predict we'll still see it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
It's a process Posted August 27, 2013 Share Posted August 27, 2013 Why would Syria use them when they are in the process of winning the war.... Not to mention it goes hand and hand with the UN inspectors arriving in Syria. Also it's a known fact the FSA have staged stuff like this before... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Erik Karlsson Posted August 27, 2013 Share Posted August 27, 2013 WW3 coming soon folks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kyledude Posted August 27, 2013 Share Posted August 27, 2013 Totally fake. Not true at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Hornet Posted August 27, 2013 Share Posted August 27, 2013 Does this mean we can't invade Iran anymore? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brick Tamland Posted August 27, 2013 Share Posted August 27, 2013 Wow, CDC is full of a bunch of conspiracy theorists... Israel? Obama? CIA is doing this? IF Assad did NOT do this, why would he NOT let the UN to examine but instead destroy the evidence. Secondly, if Russia is backing Syria this MUST be someone else... What a bunch of clowns on here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DonLever Posted August 27, 2013 Author Share Posted August 27, 2013 Wow, CDC is full of a bunch of conspiracy theorists... Israel? Obama? CIA is doing this? IF Assad did NOT do this, why would he NOT let the UN to examine but instead destroy the evidence. Secondly, if Russia is backing Syria this MUST be someone else... What a bunch of clowns on here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plum Posted August 27, 2013 Share Posted August 27, 2013 Why is USA getting involved? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
key2thecup Posted August 27, 2013 Share Posted August 27, 2013 Does this mean we can't invade Iran anymore? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
key2thecup Posted August 27, 2013 Share Posted August 27, 2013 Why is USA getting involved? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DonLever Posted August 27, 2013 Author Share Posted August 27, 2013 Why is USA getting involved? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AllEyezOnMe Posted August 27, 2013 Share Posted August 27, 2013 Do nothing USA gets Blamed, intervene with Force USA gets blamed for warmongering invading muslim lands. So let's just sit back and watch the war on LL for entertainment. everyone wins. Does not matter what The USA and it's allies do Muslims will always kill each other over a pedophile prophet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buddhas Hand Posted August 27, 2013 Share Posted August 27, 2013 Your dad is a pedophile so jus calm down Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kryten Posted August 27, 2013 Share Posted August 27, 2013 Makes more sense if Russia did it. It gets the US involved in another middle eastern conflict and in hot water with Iran. Russia then makes arms deals with the countries involved and makes a mint. Putin will then have the finest cameras to take his shirtless selfies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUPERTKBD Posted August 27, 2013 Share Posted August 27, 2013 'We as a country'?? Thats a good laugh. Yeah you and me together with chretien and harper stayed out of that one. I too identify with the most corrupt politicians in the world.. Even if you wish to speak in such patriotic language its not true, all one has to do is dig a little into the role of the govt of canada in the US massacre in Iraq. It was the US ambassador to Canada at the time, who for all the cameras angrily opposed chretiens' manoeuvre to not tactically send troops to Iraq, stated his appreciation and thanked the govt of canada for being one of the main financiers for the war on Iraq. Canada also supplied a massive amount of the bullets for their war against Iraq. So although chretien gave the appearance of being against the coalition of fun or whatever they were called, behind the scenes he was a huge part of the division of labour in that coalition... As we are seeing with the western funded war on Syria, sending troops is not the only way a government can support a war, there are many more ways to destabilize, weaken or overthrow your opponents in a sovereign land... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.