dKs89 Posted September 4, 2013 Share Posted September 4, 2013 I think the way BW posted and gave up is definitely suspicious. However it's just the first round, so you should take everything with a grain of salt. Link to comment
Master Radishes Posted September 4, 2013 Share Posted September 4, 2013 I think the way BW posted and gave up is definitely suspicious. However it's just the first round, so you should take everything with a grain of salt. Link to comment
Beluga Whale Posted September 4, 2013 Share Posted September 4, 2013 Perhaps. I'm still curious why, after having only 3 votes against you and 4 hours left in the round (usually the busiest hours too) you thought it was a "lost cause." Link to comment
dKs89 Posted September 4, 2013 Share Posted September 4, 2013 I completely agree. Nonetheless, stop your fence-sitting for once and have a real opinion. All you ever do is sit back and abstain. That doesn't help the TP one bit. Link to comment
Peaches Posted September 4, 2013 Share Posted September 4, 2013 I completely agree. Nonetheless, stop your fence-sitting for once and have a real opinion. All you ever do is sit back and abstain. That doesn't help the TP one bit. Link to comment
Master Radishes Posted September 4, 2013 Share Posted September 4, 2013 I will almost always abstain in the first round. Link to comment
Go Faulk Yourself Posted September 4, 2013 Share Posted September 4, 2013 Abstaining always happens round one. I don't think a ban should be given for those who abstain. There's already god-killing for that. I think if anything there should be no abstaining after the first two rounds (I'd be fine after the first round myself). Link to comment
Intoewsables Posted September 4, 2013 Share Posted September 4, 2013 I thought if I looked like I gave up easy it would convince people to not vote or me. It worked for a few people, but it obviously wasn't enough. Link to comment
Master Radishes Posted September 4, 2013 Share Posted September 4, 2013 Abstaining always happens round one. I don't think a ban should be given for those who abstain. There's already god-killing for that. I think if anything there should be no abstaining after the first two rounds (I'd be fine after the first round myself). Link to comment
Master 112 Posted September 4, 2013 Share Posted September 4, 2013 I think if anything there should be no abstaining after the first two rounds (I'd be fine after the first round myself). Link to comment
VICanucksfan5551 Posted September 4, 2013 Share Posted September 4, 2013 I agree. Can there be a rule that after 2+ games of just going "Hmmm I'm not sure yet, I'm gonna abstain." they get a one game ban. (I'm totally expecting a Feds rant at this heehee) Link to comment
Go Faulk Yourself Posted September 4, 2013 Share Posted September 4, 2013 If we've already clarified that abstaining does not count as an official vote, then what's the point of even doing it in the first place? I agree, there should be no ban, and there's nothing stopping people from just doing it, but can we at least pretend to disallow the practice? It actually serves no purpose, since it doesn't count as an official vote anyway. Link to comment
Master Radishes Posted September 4, 2013 Share Posted September 4, 2013 From now on, if anyone wants to "vote abstain," save us the trouble and just say "I have no opinion but I need to post to appear active." Link to comment
King Heffy Posted September 4, 2013 Share Posted September 4, 2013 When I abstain, it's my way of saying I'm waiting for more information. I'll almost always change my vote to a real vote before nightfall. Link to comment
Master Radishes Posted September 4, 2013 Share Posted September 4, 2013 When I abstain, it's my way of saying I'm waiting for more information. I'll almost always change my vote to a real vote before nightfall. Link to comment
Kryten Posted September 4, 2013 Share Posted September 4, 2013 Anyone know if CA is kicking around somewhere? I fear the liquor may have him. Link to comment
VICanucksfan5551 Posted September 4, 2013 Share Posted September 4, 2013 I'm curious as to why people switched to susraiders at the end there. Peaches wasn't that far off of BW in votes and I don't see susraiders as any more suspicious. All that accomplished was ensuring that BW got hung. Link to comment
Not A Fruit Posted September 4, 2013 Share Posted September 4, 2013 When I abstain, it's my way of saying I'm waiting for more information. I'll almost always change my vote to a real vote before nightfall. Link to comment
Go Faulk Yourself Posted September 4, 2013 Share Posted September 4, 2013 Anyone know if CA is kicking around somewhere? I fear the liquor may have him. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.