Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

Eddie Lack: Our scouting isn't terrible


Canorcas

Recommended Posts

eddie_lack.jpg

The Stork

For all the (justified?) boourns the Canucks' scouting staff have to deal with, every now and then they pick up a gem and it goes largely unnoticed.

That is until it's too obvious to ignore. Chris Tanev says hello, by the way.

There's no need to go through the Canucks' woeful drafting record in the past decade. Everything that needs to be said has been spoken. We're still wondering where Nathan Smith is and most of us still have R.J Umberger getting laid out by Brian Campbell bookmarked somewhere on Youtube.

The fact is poor scouting and poor drafting have been an area of concern for this organization and they look enviously around the league, marveling at all the players who successfully graduated from their respective hockey programs.

Even the one real stud the Canucks drafted in 2004 by the name of Cory Schneider had to leave town. We all know how that went.

But not all of scouting is left in the fate of the draft floor.

Eddie Lack was a quiet addition to the organization in April of 2010. Not surprisingly, it was a fellow Swede who noticed his raw talent and skill. Former Canuck and current team scout Lars Lindgren was asked to keep tabs on Jacob Markstrom-- then with Brynas IF of the Swedish Elite League. Markstrom was a hot name at the time-- big, fast, technically sound and competitive. Lindgren was joined by perhaps a dozen scouts from various clubs trying to determine if he'd be the next Swedish phenom in net.

But while the others were too busy keeping track of Markstrom, nobody paid much attention to his back-up, a tall, lanky and goofy kid by the name of Eddie Lack.

Nobody that is, except Lindgren.

uDvlK9w.jpg?1

Despite playing just a handful of games, Lindgren had seen enough. The potential was there. The skillset was there. All he needed was a chance. Lack wasn't on anybody's list and had been passed in the draft after a relatively unexciting junior-level career.

Goaltending is a difficult position to judge. There's really no obvious way of determining if a goalie will pan out the way you expect them to. Some put together excellent junior careers and cease to stop pucks at the highest level. Others develop slower but once they're in form, they become franchise-quality netminders.

Hindsight is 20/20 and as this article is being written, Lack's future seems to be in better shape than his former teammate Markstrom's. Maybe that's what happens when you play in Florida, though.

Regardless, you put their numbers side-by-side and you can clearly see the Canucks unearthed a diamond in the rough with Lack.

Markstrom was drafted 31st overall in 2008 by the Panthers and has yet to cement his role as starter. In fact, he had that opportunity this season after Florida chose to let Jose Theodore walk during the summer.

How did that end up? Well they signed Tim Thomas who had essentially quit the Boston Bruins and hockey all of last year. Yikes.

Markstrom, now with the San Antonio Rampage of the AHL, is at a crucial part of his career and you can bet GM Dave Tallon is scratching his head over his own mess. If Markstrom was ready, he'd be playing. That's the short of it.

In contrast, Lack has slipped under the radar the past few seasons-- mostly due to a long-term hip injury that kept him out for all but 13 games last year with the Chicago Wolves.

Today, he is Roberto Luongo's backup and has looked solid in all of his four starts for Vancouver this year. His technique is sound, his rebound control is manageable and he endeared himself to Canucks fans when he stood his ground and took a jab at a player who crashed his crease. Checkmarks across the board.

At only 25 years old, there's still room for him to grow-- in terms of size and skill. But shooters can't ignore how big he looks between the pipes. Lack is listed at 6'5, 196 pounds. That's Pekka Rinne territory. Having a natural size advantage is always beneficial as long as you have speed to match-- and there's no lack of agility there.

And it's not like Lack became Roberto's backup by default. The team had options. They even signed Joacim Eriksson this off-season to bring in more competition during training camp and he played quite well. But Lack played better.

Beyond his position, Lack is a likable guy. He's funny, goofy, polite, speaks with a country-style Swedish accent and has his own dance move (seriously!). He genuinely seems to be enjoying his time in Vancouver and seems unfazed by the fact Roberto owns the crease in Vancouver for the rest of his playing days. Instead, he seems eager to learn from one of the game's best and is happy to fit in with a team that has a chance to compete for the Stanley Cup.

Not a bad career so far for a guy who was never supposed to play in the National Hockey League.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Lack more than Luongo. Lack, for a big guy shows so much more athleticism. Remember, many people who watched Lack and Schneider down in, what used to be Manitoba all have said Lack looked better at the same age. I see Lack having more promise. He has so much tools to work with. It's too bad he was injured last season. Love his "Goofy" attitude as well. Many of the best goalies in NHL history have weird personalities and aren't robots.

I said the same thing last year, when we had all three goalies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to agree. Our goaltending is as good now as it was pre-Horvat. I also believe our scouting isn't half bad. I guess I'm an optimist and have seen the team change so much over the years that I tend to not get caught up with any one player or transaction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to agree. Our goaltending is as good now as it was pre-Horvat.

So you're saying Lack is as good as Schneider? I'd have to disagree. How good Lack becomes remains to be seen... but there is no longer much doubt over how good Schneider is.

Don't get me wrong - I'm glad to have the goalie situation sorted now. I'm glad Lack is showing great potential as an NHL player. And I'm glad that out of the bs we ended up with a top prospect. I just don't think the goaltending is "as good" as it was with two elite goalies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah... Our scouting isnt that bad with one pick they got lucky and took a chance on. He was a backup at the time and our scouts got lucky. I'm not saying all other picks are bad, we have amazing picks... Kesler, Edler, Bieksa, Hansen etc. its not that the scouts are genious' or anything... Its that Lack proved a lot, and proved a lot more people wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eddie Lack is awesome. I spent last night workin' for Nintendo at the Sports Celebrities Festival and Eddie Lack and Chris Tanev were the Canucks at my station. Tanev got bored pretty easily and wandered off as soon as he was allowed. Eddie asked if he could stay instead of taking a break and we chatted and played games for 2 hours straight. He's easily the funniest Canuck I've ever met. I've really liked his on-ice performance too given that it's obviously not the nicest market for a goalie to play in. He's having fun and holding his own. Go eddie go!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you're saying Lack is as good as Schneider? I'd have to disagree. How good Lack becomes remains to be seen... but there is no longer much doubt over how good Schneider is.

Don't get me wrong - I'm glad to have the goalie situation sorted now. I'm glad Lack is showing great potential as an NHL player. And I'm glad that out of the bs we ended up with a top prospect. I just don't think the goaltending is "as good" as it was with two elite goalies.

OK, I can't argue that 2 elite goalies isn't better than 1. What I would say is 2 elite goalies isn't necessarily a better situation. You can only play one goalie at a time and we needed to trade one to get more useful asset. I more meant that Lack as a backup gives me as many warm and fuzzies as I had with Schneider or Lu as backup, and we have a new piece to the puzzle. I would have a preferred an immediate return for the trade but like I said, I try not to get too caught up in each transaction, we'll see how Bo works out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So what you're saying is ....

We don't Lack good scouts?

We also don't Lack a solid tender!

Aaaaaanyway...... These finds by our scouts are fine and dandy, but it's also their job. But for every Chris Tanev and Eddie Lack, might there be a zetterberg, a bieksa, or other top-level talents out there that we did miss?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...