F.Underwood Posted May 11, 2014 Share Posted May 11, 2014 TO : LA 3RD 2018 TO : WSH 3RD 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inane Posted May 11, 2014 Share Posted May 11, 2014 How do those trades make any sense and why do we allow it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canucklax Posted May 11, 2014 Share Posted May 11, 2014 How do those trades make any sense and why do we allow it? TOR-PIT I understand as the 2017 pick could be higher next year, but a 2 year jump is kinda much. For gally-dis, I guess gally gets a future trade asset when he feels no current prospect interests him? I dunno You're up in the draft btw, not sure if you requested to be bpa'd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gally Posted May 11, 2014 Share Posted May 11, 2014 TOR-PIT I understand as the 2017 pick could be higher next year, but a 2 year jump is kinda much. For gally-dis, I guess gally gets a future trade asset when he feels no current prospect interests him? I dunno You're up in the draft btw, not sure if you requested to be bpa'd I don't really remember much of what happened last night. I seem to recall me thinking the 3rd was next year's third and that I was too drunk to pick and might as well trade it instead of getting the BPA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AriGold Posted May 11, 2014 Share Posted May 11, 2014 How do those trades make any sense and why do we allow it? A veto should only happen in extreme circumstances when a trade is so lopsided is effects the team performance for years to come. While these trades have a clear winner the overall value has little to no effect on a teams future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xbox Posted May 11, 2014 Share Posted May 11, 2014 Chimon and Lax are tied IMO. It's neat seeing people know so much about the future prospects and have a mini-write up on them. Makes the draft a lot more interesting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inane Posted May 11, 2014 Share Posted May 11, 2014 A veto should only happen in extreme circumstances when a trade is so lopsided is effects the team performance for years to come. While these trades have a clear winner the overall value has little to no effect on a teams future.I get this isn't a big deal in terms of immediate impact. But trading a 3rd round pick now for a 3rd round pick 2 years from now...that just makes absolutely no sense. The temporal loss of an asset for absolutely no benefit whatsoever...if the future Canucks GM dealt this years 3rd for 2016's 3rd straight up, what would we all say about that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AriGold Posted May 11, 2014 Share Posted May 11, 2014 I get this isn't a big deal in terms of immediate impact. But trading a 3rd round pick now for a 3rd round pick 2 years from now...that just makes absolutely no sense. The temporal loss of an asset for absolutely no benefit whatsoever...if the future Canucks GM dealt this years 3rd for 2016's 3rd straight up, what would we all say about that? That they were drunk and should stay off CDC when they are drunk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canucklax Posted May 11, 2014 Share Posted May 11, 2014 I get this isn't a big deal in terms of immediate impact. But trading a 3rd round pick now for a 3rd round pick 2 years from now...that just makes absolutely no sense. The temporal loss of an asset for absolutely no benefit whatsoever...if the future Canucks GM dealt this years 3rd for 2016's 3rd straight up, what would we all say about that? That he(mg is gone now) was drunk, and gally was lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gally Posted May 11, 2014 Share Posted May 11, 2014 I don't care that much guys. I probably shouldn't have checked CDC lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Intoewsables Posted May 11, 2014 Share Posted May 11, 2014 James Reimer is available for anyone who needs a 1B goaltender please just take him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tanev Posted May 11, 2014 Share Posted May 11, 2014 Canucks looking to grab one of the next picks in the draft. We have 2 4ths in return! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AriGold Posted May 11, 2014 Share Posted May 11, 2014 James Reimer is available for anyone who needs a 1B goaltender please just take him oh wow, 4M.. Who signed that deal when he is in the low 80's for attributes ? Also a question for VC, sorry if this has been posted. Do we have the option for a buyout ? Is each team getting one this offseason ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caboose Posted May 11, 2014 Share Posted May 11, 2014 oh wow, 4M.. Who signed that deal when he is in the low 80's for attributes ? Also a question for VC, sorry if this has been posted. Do we have the option for a buyout ? Is each team getting one this offseason ? I believe it was the mighty sweefish. His damage is still felt to this day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Intoewsables Posted May 11, 2014 Share Posted May 11, 2014 oh wow, 4M.. Who signed that deal when he is in the low 80's for attributes ? Also a question for VC, sorry if this has been posted. Do we have the option for a buyout ? Is each team getting one this offseason ? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2g5Hz17C4is Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sidney Crosby. Posted May 11, 2014 Share Posted May 11, 2014 How do those trades make any sense and why do we allow it? I like to have picks so I have more bait during the season and trade deadline. I find in my dealings GM's prefer picks rather than uncreated prospects (if I were to use the pick). Plus it makes my own picks more expendable for attempting to sign a RFA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
F.Underwood Posted May 11, 2014 Share Posted May 11, 2014 To : James Reimer, 2016 4th DAL To : Future considerations Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gmen81 Posted May 11, 2014 Share Posted May 11, 2014 I think I've asked this before, but have any of those future considerations actually happen? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canucklax Posted May 11, 2014 Share Posted May 11, 2014 To : James Reimer, 2016 4th DAL To : Future considerations could use the cap for when Getz gets traded, and he can take the pressure off Wedgewood if/when we get shelled this season and next. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canucklax Posted May 11, 2014 Share Posted May 11, 2014 I think I've asked this before, but have any of those future considerations actually happen? honestly I'm getting paid a 4th round pick to take reimer's contract off his hands. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.