Plan B: Billionaire family's plan to bypass Keystone Pipeline

[key2thecup]

Forget Keystone XL, one of Canada’s wealthiest business dynasties has a ‘Plan B’ for the oil sands

Since 2012, the billionaire Irving family has been advocating a proposal called Energy East. The 2,858-mile (4,600-km) pipeline would link trillions of dollars worth of oil in land-locked fields in the western province of Alberta to an Atlantic port in the Irvings’ eastern home province of New Brunswick, north of Maine, creating a gateway to new foreign markets for Canadian oil. Above, an aerial view of the Irving Oil Refinery in Saint John, N.B.

SAINT JOHN, New Brunswick — Keystone XL, a pipeline proposal to pump Canadian oil sands through the heart of America, has alarmed environmentalists and become one of the most contentious issues of the Obama presidency. But there is a “Plan B” to cut the United States out of the picture, and it is championed by one of Canada’s wealthiest business dynasties.

Since 2012, the billionaire Irving family has been advocating a proposal called Energy East. The 2,858-mile (4,600-km) pipeline would link trillions of dollars worth of oil in land-locked fields in the western province of Alberta to an Atlantic port in the Irvings’ eastern home province of New Brunswick, north of Maine, creating a gateway to new foreign markets for Canadian oil.

The $12 billion line, which would pump 1.1 million barrels per day, would include about 1,865 miles of existing natural gas pipeline converted to carry oil. The rest would be new construction, most of it along the banks of the Saint Lawrence River and into New Brunswick.

The industry is keen. Pipeline company TransCanada Corp, which is also backing Keystone, unveiled plans in August to build and operate Energy East by 2018. Customers as far away as India are lined up to take the oil, according to New Brunswick provincial officials. Canadian oil companies, frustrated by Washington’s dithering on Keystone, say they have seized on it as a viable alternative to the route through the United States.

“The genesis of this is really the Keystone XL pipeline, and the continuing political obstacles to getting approval for it,” said Frank McKenna, former New Brunswick premier, Irving family friend and vocal advocate of the project.

The genesis of this is really the Keystone XL pipeline, and the continuing political obstacles to getting approval for it

The Energy East proposal began with the Irvings, people familiar with the project say. If it is built, it will stop with them, too, at a $300 million marine terminal they are planning to build in Saint John, New Brunswick, to service the project.

The Irvings also would be among the top beneficiaries. A study commissioned by TransCanada and prepared by Deloitte calculated that the pipeline’s access to cheaper crude from the west would save as much as $1.2 billion per year for a refinery owned by the Irvings, while creating 121 direct long-term jobs in sparsely populated New Brunswick.

The idea of a pipeline from west to east was not new: TransCanada had been looking at a possible route that would stop in Quebec, but that plan had not left the drawing board. The Irvings’ proposal breathed new life into it.

The family’s industrial empire in New Brunswick, a century in the making, can help make it possible: Here in Saint John, their flagship company, Irving Oil, runs the East Coast’s only ice-free, deepwater oil port capable of receiving the largest crude tankers. It also operates Canada’s largest oil refinery – the source of nearly one in three tanks of gasoline imported to the East Coast of the United States.

THE CANADIAN PRESS/Andrew VaughanPrime Minister Stephen Harper, left, chats with New Brunswick Premier David Alward and Arthur Irving, right, chairman of Irving Oil as he visits the Irving Oil refinery in Saint John, N.B. on Thursday, Aug. 8, 2013.

The Irving advantage extends beyond infrastructure. The family’s companies generate two-thirds of New Brunswick’s global exports and are the province’s largest private sector employer. Their buildings dominate the Saint John skyline: Irving’s Atlantic Wallboard, Irving Tissue, Irving Pulp and Paper, Irving Canaport, the Irving refinery; many of them chuffing white smoke into the winter air around downtown. That commerce – and a strong grip on the province’s media – gives the Irvings significant political influence in a heavily indebted part of Canada where one in 10 people are without a job.

Irving Oil’s CEO, Paul Browning, said at the formal announcement of Energy East that the company was “extremely pleased to be partnering with TransCanada.” Representatives of both the Irving family and Irving Oil declined comment for this article.

A TransCanada spokesman said the Energy East project was the culmination of hard work by “many different parties.”

MEET THE IRVINGS

The Irving empire got its start more than 130 years ago, in a fishing village huddled on New Brunswick’s northern coast. A Scottish immigrant named James Dergavel Irving built a saw mill and a general store in the late 1800s near stands of spruce and fir. But it was J.D.’s son, Kenneth Colin, born in 1899, who drove the family’s success.

In his early 20s, K.C., a car salesman, convinced his father to let him open a gas station in front of the general store to sell fuel for the Model Ts he retailed. That service station, and the hundreds that followed, became the center of a conglomerate. Though K.C. died in 1992, many here still refer to the man rather than to the business empire, a feature of the company-town feel of this Canadian province.

“If it moves in New Brunswick, the Irvings are involved,” says Donald Savoie, a New Brunswick historian.

If it moves in New Brunswick, the Irvings are involved.

Today, the Irving holdings span 162 companies in the Atlantic provinces. Two of K.C.’s sons, Arthur and James, are now the family’s most powerful members. They own Irving Oil and forestry giant J.D. Irving, respectively, the group’s two largest companies. Forbes Magazine’s 2014 billionaires list placed Arthur’s net worth at around $6.1 billion and James’ at $6.7 billion. Irving-owned companies build warships, sell French fries, run a railway network and operate a private security firm.

THE CANADIAN PRESS/Andrew VaughanStorage tanks are seen at the Irving Oil refinery in Saint John, N.B. last August.

The family is also a huge landowner. Its 1.2 million acres of timberland in Maine made it the No. 5 U.S. landholder in 2012, according to the Land Report. In Canada, the Irvings own more than 2 million acres, and operate timber licenses on another nearly 2.5 million acres of public land, according to a 2013 audit by KPMG.

Canadian Business Magazine’s 2014 edition ranked the Irving family third on its Top 25 most wealthy Canadians list, placing its riches at some $7.85 billion – nearly the size of the province’s total projected revenues for the year.

PLAN ‘B’

The Keystone XL pipeline was proposed in 2008 as a way of getting 830,000 barrels per day of crude from Alberta to the U.S. market. It would start near the Canadian town of Hardisty, Alberta, and terminate in Steele City, Nebraska. There, it would link up to an existing pipeline network terminating in Nederland, Texas, near the coast of the Gulf of Mexico.

TransCanada says the project would be “the safest and most advanced pipeline operation in North America.” U.S. environmental groups say it will threaten American groundwater resources and hasten climate change by fuelling expansion of Alberta’s oil sands. The Obama administration has delayed making a final decision that could anger environmentalists, a key constituency of the Democratic president.

In October 2012, representatives from Irving Oil and New Brunswick’s government traveled to the western Canadian oil hub of Calgary to present their alternative: a west-east oil pipeline that would go all the way to the Atlantic. Irving Oil had asked for the meeting, according to a person who attended. Waiting for them in a conference room were Canadian provincial energy officials, executives from TransCanada, and representatives from industry heavyweights Canadian Natural Resources, Imperial Oil, Suncor, and Shell Canada.

SAUL LOEB/AFP/Getty ImagesProtesters hold signs against the building of the Keystone XL Pipeline, a 1,980-mile (3,200-kilometer) conduit for oil from Canada's oil sands region to the US Gulf Coast, outside a Democratic event with U.S. President Barack Obama, in Washington, DC last July.

Representatives of all the companies involved declined to comment on the record about the meeting.

Alberta’s oil minister, Ken Hughes, whispered into the ear of his counterpart from New Brunswick, Craig Leonard. Never before, Leonard remembers Hughes saying, had he seen so many of the major oil sands players together in a single room. And they were listening keenly.

“It was like a light bulb turned on,” said Leonard. “It was very clear from the reaction that this was an idea that had tremendous potential.”

According to Leonard and others at the meeting, Mike Ashar, at the time the CEO of Irving Oil, outlined how a pipeline east across Canada to Saint John could help get Alberta’s oil efficiently to the world market, paving the way for higher prices and the potential for expanded production.

Ashar said the pipeline could provide a reason to build Canada’s first oil sands upgrader – a facility that processes tar sands into a product that can be more easily refined into gasoline, diesel and other fuels – on the Atlantic coast. There, lower labor costs and easy access to imports could reduce the facility’s multi-billion dollar price tag by 40%, according to an attendee who asked not to be named.

The need for a new route for Canada’s oil was acute, say industry experts. While the United States delayed Keystone, Canadian supply mounted and prices dropped. The Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce estimated the glut and lack of pipeline capacity had cost Canada $25 billion in oil revenues in 2012.

“The value destruction as a result of not getting our crude to market is a staggering cost to Canada. It needed a solution,” said former New Brunswick premier McKenna, who is now on the board of oil sands producer Canadian Natural Resources.

JEAN LEVAC/Postmedia files“The value destruction as a result of not getting our crude to market is a staggering cost to Canada. It needed a solution,” said former New Brunswick premier Frank McKenna, who is now on the board of oil sands producer Canadian Natural Resources.

As Irving Oil prepared to make its sales pitch to TransCanada and the oil sands producers, it stepped up its lobbying efforts in Ottawa. Irving Oil executives held more meetings with Canadian regulators and office-holders in 2012 than in the two previous years combined, according to federal lobbying disclosure documents reviewed by Reuters. These included repeated meetings with Joe Oliver, then Canada’s natural resources minister, the ministry’s director of oil sands, advisors to Prime Minister Stephen Harper, and environment ministry officials.

Now Energy East has the public support of Canada’s conservative government and the government of New Brunswick, where much of the new pipeline construction would take place. The project has also moved much more quickly, from conception to requesting regulatory approval, than its all-Canadian rival, Northern Gateway, which would transport oil over the Rocky Mountains to the Pacific Coast.

The Northern Gateway project, announced in 2006, took four years to file its request and still does not have approval due to questions about how it would install and operate the line in an environmentally sensitive region. By comparison, TransCanada filed a preliminary request for Energy East with the National Energy Board in February and plans to submit the full request this summer, just over a year after the project was announced.

‘BRING IT ON’

New Brunswick has also moved fast. Just two months after the initial Calgary meeting, the provincial legislature was ready to act. The assembly voted unanimously to endorse “construction of a west-east crude oil pipeline to bring western crude oil to Saint John” eight months before the project was officially unveiled.

If the Energy East pipeline is built, it would be a blow to those who oppose oil sands development on environmental grounds: Energy East would pose no less a threat than Keystone. It could even be a bigger problem, Canadian environmental groups say, because the line would be longer and carry more oil. Their opposition hasn’t gained much traction.

“Unlike in other provinces, we just said, ‘bring it on,’” said David Coon, leader of New Brunswick’s Green Party, which has no seats in the assembly. “There was no serious debate. No serious discussion. No inquiry,” he said.

Keystone, by contrast, has seen virtually every detail scrutinized by U.S. media and environmental groups, who have fervently questioned the project’s promises for job creation, spill-prevention and climate change impacts.

Supporters of Energy East say the economic environment in New Brunswick explains local eagerness: The province’s 10% unemployment rate is 3 points above the Canadian national average.

Saint John could also use a boost. Municipal records show a population decline of 25% since the early 1970s. It has the 6th highest concentration of low-income residents among cities in Canada, according to Statistics Canada.

It isn’t clear that the Energy East project would do much to help, though. The Deloitte study estimated that the pipeline would create 1,427 direct jobs in the development and construction phases in New Brunswick, but only 121 jobs long-term.

Mark Tunney, former editor-in-chief of Irving’s flagship Saint John Telegraph-Journal, attributes local support for the pipeline in part to the Irving family’s control of media in the province. The Irvings’ Brunswick News owns all the province’s English-language daily newspapers and three-quarters of its weeklies – 20 newspapers in all. They also own Acadia Broadcasting, which operates 10 radio stations in three provinces.

A March 4 editorial in the Telegraph-Journal called on provincial politicians to stand united in support of Energy East and against the “small minority” who oppose it. The editorial was written in reaction to a small public protest against the pipeline days earlier.

Patricia Graham, the ombudswoman for Brunswick News, which publishes the Telegraph-Journal, said the company was committed to providing balanced coverage, including of Irving ventures.

I am unaware of any facts that demonstrate that the number of papers owned equates to poor journalism

[Hobble]

Refining our own oil and then selling it ourselves? Why are we not doing that in the first place?

[Western Red]

Coinciding with ripping through parks, this looks semi-forgone as a conclusion of collusion.

[Nosferatu.]

Yes! That's perfect. Screw the USA. It's time Canada does things without them.

[King Heffy]

I don't have a problem with this. The oil's getting refined in Canada, which will create long-term jobs, and is being shipped out of a port that is actually capable of handling the tankers.

[Standing_Tall#37]

Refining our own oil and then selling it ourselves? Why are we not doing that in the first place?

Because it would mean lower barrel prices. Lower prices = less profit. Big oil companies are about big oil profit

[theminister]

I don't have a problem with this. The oil's getting refined in Canada, which will create long-term jobs, and is being shipped out of a port that is actually capable of handling the tankers.

Only 121 permanent jobs directly according to the article.

These initiatives are not about creating jobs. They are about creating profit. Everything else is a distant second in consideration.

[Lancaster]

Only 121 permanent jobs directly according to the article.

These initiatives are not about creating jobs. They are about creating profit. Everything else is a distant second in consideration.

It just means it's time to re-balance your portfolio to take advantage of this opportunity.

[Violator]

Refining our own oil and then selling it ourselves? Why are we not doing that in the first place?

Cause alberta crude isnt worth as much as its worth in south texas.Labour is also half the price south of the boarder.

The first new refinery in thirty years is being built in edmonton.

What i have said about keystone is since BC doesnt want to play ball they should just re plan the line through the Yukon.

[key2thecup]

Cause alberta crude isnt worth as much as its worth in south texas.Labour is also half the price south of the boarder.

The first new refinery in thirty years is being built in edmonton.

What i have said about keystone is since BC doesnt want to play ball they should just re plan the line through the Yukon.

That route would go from Alberta - NWT - Yukon and Yukon doesn't have sea access, it's taken by Alaska. So it would then have to be cut into the edge of BC and they could access the water then...... Or they go to Alaska but then I'm pretty sure the feds lose profit to the yankees then.

*edit nvm, Alaska takes more sea access than I thought, you would have to pull that pipeline down a substantial amount of BC land to kitimat

[Violator]

That route would go from Alberta - NWT - Yukon and Yukon doesn't have sea access, it's taken by Alaska. So it would then have to be cut into the edge of BC and they could access the water then...... Or they go to Alaska but then I'm pretty sure the feds lose profit to the yankees then.

*edit nvm, Alaska takes more sea access than I thought, you would have to pull that pipeline down a substantial amount of BC land to kitimat

They are loosing more money in delays than anything and the cost to move it through the states would probalby only cost a fraction of what it would cost to move it throught bc.Its a buyers market right know and with china failtering they dont have anybody to sell it to.

[Offensive Threat]

Move it by rail. I own stock in CN Rail. Its good business.

[drummer4now]

Move it by rail. I own stock in CN Rail. Its good business.

and repeat another Lac-Megantic like derailment? Id rather have the pipeline go through the Yukon and into Alaska OR have the Crude domestically refined here.

[key2thecup]

Move it by rail. I own stock in CN Rail. Its good business.

Ah like Warren Buffet, who's against Keystone but is set to be moving that same crude via his rail company...