Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

[Official] Toronto Blue Jays Major League Baseball thread


The Stork

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, RUPERTKBD said:

I gotta say, Ohtani surprised me....he took the first pitch right down the middle and then swung at two pitches that were well inside.....

Guess Othani had made his mind up to take the first pitch, which is understandable with the bases loaded. Once he fell behind 0-1, he started chasing a bit. I'll take it, though.

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Brad Marchand said:

Guess Othani had made his mind up to take the first pitch, which is understandable with the bases loaded. Once he fell behind 0-1, he started chasing a bit. I'll take it, though.

Exactly right.

 

Gotta give Mayza and Kirk credit for that third pitch. If Ohtani chased it the first time, there's a good chance he chases again with two strikes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get that these two pitches could have gone either way and sometimes the Jays are the ones who benefit, but this sort of inconsistency is why I've been on the mechanical strike and balls bandwagon for several years now....

This series of tweets was somewhat in defense of Trevor Richards, but he's simply walking too many guys and when you miss that often, sometimes the ump assumes you missed on close pitches. It looks like that's what happened in this case.

 

The tweet at the top shows to the two RBI hits Richards surrendered to the Royals. (The one on the left was a homer) Neither looked to be a bad pitch....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, RUPERTKBD said:

I get that these two pitches could have gone either way and sometimes the Jays are the ones who benefit, but this sort of inconsistency is why I've been on the mechanical strike and balls bandwagon for several years now....

This series of tweets was somewhat in defense of Trevor Richards, but he's simply walking too many guys and when you miss that often, sometimes the ump assumes you missed on close pitches. It looks like that's what happened in this case.

 

The tweet at the top shows to the two RBI hits Richards surrendered to the Royals. (The one on the left was a homer) Neither looked to be a bad pitch....

I think letting the ump program their own strike zone (within reason) is a compromise that works to keep the human element.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, King Heffy said:

I think letting the ump program their own strike zone (within reason) is a compromise that works to keep the human element.

I'm not sure what purpose that would serve....

 

It makes more sense to me to have a universally accepted K-Zone. Maybe you could consult the umpires on what that would be, but I don't think it makes much sense to ask pitchers to learn a couple of dozen individual umpires' idea of what's a strike and what isn't. :unsure:

 

It isn't like the Home plate umpire would be eliminated. He would still have to call outs. Same as the other three crew members.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, RUPERTKBD said:

I'm not sure what purpose that would serve....

 

It makes more sense to me to have a universally accepted K-Zone. Maybe you could consult the umpires on what that would be, but I don't think it makes much sense to ask pitchers to learn a couple of dozen individual umpires' idea of what's a strike and what isn't. :unsure:

 

It isn't like the Home plate umpire would be eliminated. He would still have to call outs. Same as the other three crew members.

Consistency within the same game.  The home plate umpire can go over the strike zone before the game with the managers, or it could be submitted electronically.  The pitchers already know which umps have larger strike zones anyway.  I'd rather go full robot than continue with the status quo, but I think the game is changing too fast and alienating a lot of long-term fans in the process.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, King Heffy said:

Consistency within the same game.  The home plate umpire can go over the strike zone before the game with the managers, or it could be submitted electronically.  The pitchers already know which umps have larger strike zones anyway.  I'd rather go full robot than continue with the status quo, but I think the game is changing too fast and alienating a lot of long-term fans in the process.

I don't know....

 

I don't see how getting balls and strikes correct 100% of the time is going to alienate fans. I'd say that the universal DH and the pitch clock run the bigger risk of doing that.

 

As far as I can see, MLB is attempting to appeal to a younger audience, because it's core fanbase are quickly aging. I think I'd be more worried about turning off these viewers because of ridiculously inconsistent umpiring, that I would older viewers deciding they miss seeing players get called out on strikes on pitches 6 inches off the plate....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gotta give Shatkins some credit here....when they signed KK to a contract worth 9 million dollars, my first impression was "really?"

 

Now he looks like a bargain and I'm kind of wishing it was a 2 or 3 year deal....

  • Cheers 2
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Mj2345 said:

My friend is pissed right now he cut cable recently and has the Sportsnet now app but it’s down right now and the jays game is on, great timing..

It was weird yesterday for me....SNET Pacific wasn't showing the game in HD. They were showing hockey, while SNET One was showing poker. I had to watch the home opener on SNET West in standard def....:wacko:

 

My Cable package doesn't have the other Sportsnet feeds in HD....only Sportsnet One, Pacific and 360 and none of them were showing the Jays last night.

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man Gausman doesn't get much help....

 

He watches the Jays hit 5 dingers last night and tonight they can't score him more than a single run.

 

....and as I'm typing this, the Tigers hit a two run shot....<_<

Edited by RUPERTKBD
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...