canuktravella Posted April 8, 2014 Share Posted April 8, 2014 Trading a few players in core out and their replacements Hansen for a second. Replaced be kenins gritty, hits, can score great at olympics cheap at 2 yrs 580per Sedins ( retain 1mill of salary each) and edler traded to nyi for pulock 1st and martin and strome. Tanev and hutton and richardson for oilers 1st Draft ekblad and dal colle and mckeown Fire scouting staff Sign vanek at 8 mill per for 2yrs, stasny at 4yrs 6.5 mill Hire linden and naslund as president and gm. Jensen kesler vanek Burrows stasny kassian Higgins horvat mattias Kenins gaunce martin Sestito/shinkaruk/fox Garrison Ekblad Hamhuis Bieska Pulock Corrado Lack Markstrom Beastly lineup with dal colle, cassels, strome, subban, mckeown in minors Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elvis15 Posted April 8, 2014 Share Posted April 8, 2014 So, you've thought this through and that's what you've come up with? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HunterHorvatBure Posted April 8, 2014 Share Posted April 8, 2014 Lol. Why would you play Shink and Fox on the 4th line ? WITH ******* Sextito ?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elvis15 Posted April 8, 2014 Share Posted April 8, 2014 Lol. Why would you play Shink and Fox on the 4th line ? WITH ******* Sextito ?! That's the 5th line actually. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuktravella Posted April 8, 2014 Author Share Posted April 8, 2014 Ya spares for injuries can play 1st to 4th Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thad Posted April 8, 2014 Share Posted April 8, 2014 lol looks like a drunk Ottawa senators fan looked at the pub tv after gillis was fired and said to the bartender "youuuu you kn know what aanfouver shhhhould do" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slappipappi Posted April 9, 2014 Share Posted April 9, 2014 I'm guessing Vanek wants more than a 2 year deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canucks155 Posted April 9, 2014 Share Posted April 9, 2014 Lol, u might want to change ur proposals a bit more than the last u posted.1. Sure, y not2. WOULD U STOP DOING TRADE PROPOSALS TO NYI. They don't want the Sedins or Edler. They're REBUILDING. How hard is it to see that? If u actually think the Isles are in a position to try to get vets for a playoff run, then I want some of what ur smoking. Why the hell would NYI trade their top 5 pick this year when they have to give it up next year. And y would the Sedins and Edler waive to go there? This trade is just tooooooooooooo realistic.3. Lol. You're delusional. Ekblad >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Corrado. All u give them on top of that is Hutton and Richardson? Mac T knows better. They're likely drafting either 1st/2nd/3rd and they trade a top 3 pick for Corrado and a bunch on garbage? If u threw in our 1st then MAYBE they would do it, but no, u give them a decent (at best) prospect for a potential franchise player. Ekblad is going to be another Weber pretty much...You've got to be the worst at trade proposals on this forum... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanuckFanForever1123 Posted April 9, 2014 Share Posted April 9, 2014 There is a lot wrong with your post, but everyone hit on most of it, so I will go for the one thing I haven't seen touched on... You want to pay Vanek 8 mil a year? Sidney Crosby makes 8.7 a year... You cannot possibly tell me Vanek is worth only 700K less than the best player in Hockey... I would CONSIDER giving Vanek 6.5 a year, and even that is pushing it for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renelsisc Posted April 9, 2014 Share Posted April 9, 2014 Sedins won't get traded, let's be honest. No one would take those contracts, plus Linden probably won't trade them given their "character". However, Kesler probably wants out, and we REALLY can't keep Edler. We'd have to force him to waive NTC...but that's not likely either... I propose: to PHI: Kesler Schroeder 2nd to VAN: Couturier Simmonds to WIN: Shinkaruk Jensen to VAN: Kane Then buyout Booth, and trade our 1st and Gaunce for Ekblad. yes, we're trading away ALOT of our prospects, but they are replaced for proven players, and not prospect hopefuls. Plus, Couturier, Simmonds, Horvat, Kane, Kassian are all young guys. If we have them, chances for Shinkaruk, Schroeder, Gaunce, Jensen to make the team are quite limited anyways. Sedins - Simmonds Kane - Couturier - Kassian Burrows - Horvat - Matthias Higgins - RIchardson - Hansen Hamhuis - Bieksa Garrison - Tanev Edler - Ekblad Lack Markstrom And we have our youth movement right there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spur1 Posted April 10, 2014 Share Posted April 10, 2014 No to Kane Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.