DrChill Posted April 20, 2014 Share Posted April 20, 2014 To Van Wiercioch Stone 2nd 2015 To Ott Edler (pairing with buddy Karlsson, needs change of scenery) Then Assuming Chicago gets bumped by The Blues To Chicago Kesler 40% retained ( cap issues in Chicago don't want back contract back) To Vancouver Teuvo Teravainen 1st 2014 1st 2015 Trade rights to Schroeder for a pick. Sign Kassian 1.8mil Tanev 2.5 mil Weber 900k Sedin Sedin Burrows 18mins Booth Teravainen Kassian 15mins Higgins Matthias Stone 14 mins Horvat Richardson Hansen 13 mins Hamhuis Bieksa Garrison Tanev Wiercioch Corrado Weber Lack and Markstrom. With progression of Booth and Kassian at the end of the year, they are paired with Tevo who is a bit smaller but very creative. Giving youth a chance to play. Horvat gets minutes on a highly played 4th line working with two hard working forwards in Richie and Hansen. If we could sign Vanek to a 3 or 4 year deal at 7 million, I would do this in a heartbeat. He is the only UFA that I would want to sign as I believe the others will want long term and too much money for them. Statsny will want term and we have a number of youth center I want to get a chance. Then trade Hansen for a pick. Sedin Sedin Vanek 18 mins Booth Teravainen Kassian 15 mins Higgins Matthias Burrows 15 mins Horvat Richardson Stone 12 mins Hamhuis Bieksa Garrison Tanev Wiercioch Corrado Weber Lack and Markstrom. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gstank29 Posted April 20, 2014 Share Posted April 20, 2014 NO WAY CHICAGO IS GOING TO GIVE UP THAT MUCH. Yes caps was nesscary especially when your trading to an arch rival Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canucks155 Posted April 20, 2014 Share Posted April 20, 2014 Weircoch > Edler. Don't agree? More points and better +-. Chi is high on TT. Prepare to get crapped on for the salary retain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuktravella Posted April 20, 2014 Share Posted April 20, 2014 Horrible ideas no way these happen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrChill Posted April 20, 2014 Author Share Posted April 20, 2014 NO WAY CHICAGO IS GOING TO GIVE UP THAT MUCH. Yes caps was nesscary especially when your trading to an arch rival 40% retention on Kesler contract which is already a steal, no one off their roster, this is assuming they loose to STL. It is to a rival but honestly don't care. Kesler would waive to them and it makes them sickly deep. Sharp Toews Kane Saad Kesler Hossa Bickell Shaw Versteeg Bollig Kruger Carey. That is depth and 2way acumen. Sick team. Weircoch > Edler. Don't agree? More points and better +-. Chi is high on TT. Prepare to get crapped on for the salary retain. Offensively Weircoch met Edler numbers this year. Edler plays top minutes against tuff competition and has yes had a hard year. Weircoch has really sheltered minutes on third pairing . So no not better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toews Posted April 20, 2014 Share Posted April 20, 2014 40% retention on Kesler contract which is already a steal, no one off their roster, this is assuming they loose to STL. It is to a rival but honestly don't care. Kesler would waive to them and it makes them sickly deep. Sharp Toews Kane Saad Kesler Hossa Bickell Shaw Versteeg Bollig Kruger Carey. That is depth and 2way acumen. Sick team. Offensively Weircoch met Edler numbers this year. Edler plays top minutes against tuff competition and has yes had a hard year. Weircoch has really sheltered minutes on third pairing . So no not better. TT is more important for the long term for the franchise. We are going to be handing Toews and Kane possibly upwards of 9mil next year. Already we are looking at a problem if the cap doesn't rise high enough and once the extensions take effect next year we are going to make some significant cuts. Saad, Krueger and Leddy are also up for extensions. TT is valuable to us precisely because he is cheap, we need another ELC as many of our younger players are now starting to become more expensive. Already there are rumors that the Hawks would like to rid themselves of Bickell as he is taking up quite a bit of cap room. Adding Kesler even with the retaining of salary would have to facilitate the trade of someone else. Even still this trade makes little sense as we are going to surely lose Kesler to free agency because of our cap situation while TT remains cheap and will still be on an ELC and will remain cost controlled. Your price is also obscene and I can guarantee you that no one is paying consecutive first round picks and a top prospect for Kesler. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nuck in cow town Posted April 20, 2014 Share Posted April 20, 2014 TT is more important for the long term for the franchise. We are going to be handing Toews and Kane possibly upwards of 9mil next year. Already we are looking at a problem if the cap doesn't rise high enough and once the extensions take effect next year we are going to make some significant cuts. Saad, Krueger and Leddy are also up for extensions. TT is valuable to us precisely because he is cheap, we need another ELC as many of our younger players are now starting to become more expensive. Already there are rumors that the Hawks would like to rid themselves of Bickell as he is taking up quite a bit of cap room. Adding Kesler even with the retaining of salary would have to facilitate the trade of someone else. Even still this trade makes little sense as we are going to surely lose Kesler to free agency because of our cap situation while TT remains cheap and will still be on an ELC and will remain cost controlled. Your price is also obscene and I can guarantee you that no one is paying consecutive first round picks and a top prospect for Kesler. I couldn't agree more with you. Why does everyone insist on trading Kesler & trying to get all of these first round picks in return? They're the very reason were trying to get them, they're in demand. Around the trade deadline TT was my first pick on the board I wanted but realistically I thought we might get a Kruger & Saad kind of deal. I still believe the Hawks don't need Kesler with the cap for next year maybe coming in under 70 as they mentioned due to the C$, the Hawks would have problems and as you say ELC are going to be gold for them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrChill Posted April 20, 2014 Author Share Posted April 20, 2014 TT is more important for the long term for the franchise. We are going to be handing Toews and Kane possibly upwards of 9mil next year. Already we are looking at a problem if the cap doesn't rise high enough and once the extensions take effect next year we are going to make some significant cuts. Saad, Krueger and Leddy are also up for extensions. TT is valuable to us precisely because he is cheap, we need another ELC as many of our younger players are now starting to become more expensive. Already there are rumors that the Hawks would like to rid themselves of Bickell as he is taking up quite a bit of cap room. Adding Kesler even with the retaining of salary would have to facilitate the trade of someone else. Even still this trade makes little sense as we are going to surely lose Kesler to free agency because of our cap situation while TT remains cheap and will still be on an ELC and will remain cost controlled. Your price is also obscene and I can guarantee you that no one is paying consecutive first round picks and a top prospect for Kesler. Good point! So trading Kesler to Chicago, what would be a fair deal for the future of both teams? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canucks155 Posted April 20, 2014 Share Posted April 20, 2014 Horrible ideas no way these happenyour trades aren't much better... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Me_ Posted April 20, 2014 Share Posted April 20, 2014 The Canucks need a 1D bad. They're not going anywhere without one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrChill Posted April 20, 2014 Author Share Posted April 20, 2014 The Canucks need a 1D bad. They're not going anywhere without one. Which your trying to say what? Don't trade Edler? Trade for a 1D? Can u expand please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toews Posted April 21, 2014 Share Posted April 21, 2014 Good point! So trading Kesler to Chicago, what would be a fair deal for the future of both teams? I would love Kesler on the Hawks but there isn't a realistic trade that could land him on the Hawks. The Hawks are looking to offload salary not take on anymore. Kesler will be up for a new contract in 2 years time and we will not have the cap room available to sign him. Short of offloading Bickell for a pick(s), I doubt Chicago makes any major moves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fabbri Posted April 21, 2014 Share Posted April 21, 2014 Which your trying to say what? Don't trade Edler? Trade for a 1D? Can u expand please. we need a 1 number d which we dont have. Someone like Weber,Suter,Doughty and Karlsson. Hamhuis is very good but not a number 1 d Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.