Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

Rumour- RJ Umberger requests trade


Recommended Posts

"Sources have told The Dispatch that R.J. Umberger’s end-of-season meeting with Blue Jackets management and coaches ended with a mutual agreement that Umberger would go on the trading block this summer."

"Umberger, who is signed through the 2016-17 season at a $4.6 million salary-cap hit, has a no-trade clause in his contract through June 14. On June 15, the full no-trade clause becomes a limited clause, and Umberger will provide the Blue Jackets with 10 NHL clubs to which he would not approve a trade.That would leave 19 teams.

Umberger was angered and hurt late in the regular season when he was made a healthy scratch four times in a seven-game stretch while the Blue Jackets were fighting for a spot in the Stanley Cup playoffs."

http://bluejacketsxtra.dispatch.com/content/stories/2014/05/18/jackets-umberger-agree-trade-is-needed.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

His injury history would be a concern, but he's the guy that Brian Burke drove to the airport, without giving him an opportunity to play in Vancouver. Big, good skating center. Did the Canucks lose him without compensation? One of the reasons I despise Burke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

His injury history would be a concern, but he's the guy that Brian Burke drove to the airport, without giving him an opportunity to play in Vancouver. Big, good skating center. Did the Canucks lose him without compensation? One of the reasons I despise Burke.

We got Rucinsky, he played 13 games and got 3 points lol..
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We got Rucinsky, he played 13 games and got 3 points lol..

All the more reasons for me to despise Burke. RJ was certainly good enough to play for the US of A in the 2010 Olympics, but Burke being Burke, didn't even elaborate on the guy, just chose guys all around him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Sources have told The Dispatch that R.J. Umbergers end-of-season meeting with Blue Jackets management and coaches ended with a mutual agreement that Umberger would go on the trading block this summer."

"Umberger, who is signed through the 2016-17 season at a $4.6 million salary-cap hit, has a no-trade clause in his contract through June 14. On June 15, the full no-trade clause becomes a limited clause, and Umberger will provide the Blue Jackets with 10 NHL clubs to which he would not approve a trade.That would leave 19 teams.

Umberger was angered and hurt late in the regular season when he was made a healthy scratch four times in a seven-game stretch while the Blue Jackets were fighting for a spot in the Stanley Cup playoffs."

http://bluejacketsxtra.dispatch.com/content/stories/2014/05/18/jackets-umberger-agree-trade-is-needed.html

VAN

Umberger

Murray

CBJ

Kesler

6th

Link to comment
Share on other sites

VAN

Umberger

Murray

CBJ

Kesler

6th

I actually thought about this for a while.

Umberger has negative value. So adding him in the deal should sweeten a deal for Kesler alone.

To Columbus

Kesler

2nd in 2014 (36th)

To Vancouver

Wennberg

1st in 2015

1st in 2014

Umberger (negative value )

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that the first proposal of Kesler and the 6th overall for Umberger and Murray isn't far off. However, I think Kesler alone should be enough to get Umberger and Murray. Umberger isn't the same player anymore and requesting a trade and having go public only hurts the value the Jackets will get back for him. So, as someone else mentioned he is really a negative asset (kinda like Luongo was). Now, Columbus is not going to want to trade Murray. Why would they, he is there defenseman of the future. To me it is highly unlikely that Kesler waives to go to Columbus but I think a package of Anisimov, Rychel and Nikitin for Kesler and Higgins/Hansen. Stay away from Umberger.

To the proposal for Wennberg 1st in 2014 and 2015 PLUS Umberger for Kesler and a 2nd round pick. Are you serious????? No chance Columbus even takes a second to think about that. They just signed Wennberg and he will be crazy good for them.

I just don't get all these proposals for Kesler without getting an established yet young forward in return. The Canucks will not take back picks and prospects alone for Kesler. There needs to be a young roster player coming back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...