Nicklas Bo Hunter Posted May 25, 2014 Share Posted May 25, 2014 To NYI:Edler, SchroederTo Van:Reinhart, KabanovTo Van:1st overall pickTo Fla:Tanev, Hansen, 6th overall pickTo Van:Alexander KhokhlachevTo Boston:Lain, 2nd 20151st overall draft ReinhartKesler Reinhart KassianSedin Sedin JensenHiggins Santo BurrowsSestito Richardson MatthiasHamuis BieksaReinhart GarrisonStanton CorradoLackMarkstrom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gyllenhaal Posted May 25, 2014 Share Posted May 25, 2014 Alexander Khokhlachev has top 6 potential, Lain has 4th line potential. A 4th round pick isn't going to be the difference between Boston doing that deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicklas Bo Hunter Posted May 25, 2014 Author Share Posted May 25, 2014 Alexander Khokhlachev has top 6 potential, Lain has 4th line potential. A 4th round pick isn't going to be the difference between Boston doing that deal.Lain is a ready fourth line player who is young. they will more than likely not sign shawn thorton back. so there is some leverage but ye a 2nd + lain would be better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Go Faulk Yourself Posted May 25, 2014 Share Posted May 25, 2014 Tanev overrated as usual. He will not merit enough value with Hansen and a 6th to grab the 1st overall pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted May 25, 2014 Share Posted May 25, 2014 Tanev overrated as usual. He will not merit enough value with Hansen and a 6th to grab the 1st overall pick. Tanev's young and has already proven he can play top 4 minutes. That should be enough but if it isn't we'll gladly hang on to him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeremyCuddles Posted May 25, 2014 Share Posted May 25, 2014 Am I the only one that thinks we rip off the NYI hard on that deal? Or do I just really hate Ed and Shredder? I think Florida would want Bieksa more so then Tanev. Although I love Juice's leadership. No Kesler deal? That's weird lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canucks155 Posted May 25, 2014 Share Posted May 25, 2014 1. Reinhart was a top 5 pick in a good draft year, Edler lead the league w/ the worst +-. I see Edler as a top 4 dman and I think Reinhart will be one as well next season. Bad deal for the Isles. Plus, Edler wouldn't waive. 2. No problems 3. lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dogbyte Posted May 25, 2014 Share Posted May 25, 2014 No way in hell Florida does that deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Madness Posted May 25, 2014 Share Posted May 25, 2014 If you trade to #1 your taking the BPA and that is Ekblad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toews Posted May 25, 2014 Share Posted May 25, 2014 If you trade to #1 your taking the BPA and that is Ekblad. That's your opinion. I personally like Reinhart and Bennett a lot more. I might even contemplate taking Bennett 1st. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plum Posted May 25, 2014 Share Posted May 25, 2014 NYI needs to add a 2nd or something because Schroeder>Kabonov and Edler>Reinhart. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toews Posted May 25, 2014 Share Posted May 25, 2014 NYI needs to add a 2nd or something because Schroeder>Kabonov and Edler>Reinhart. Reinhart was a top 5 pick in a strong draft. Edler is coming off his worst season as a pro on the first year of a deal that pays him 5m a year. Schroeder is an undersized center prospect who the Islanders have zero use for. Tavares, Nelson, Strome, Nielsen are all better than Schroeder. Schroeder is also waiver eligible and will have to play on the roster next year. Kabanov albeit a long shot prospect is 6-3 and 18 months younger than Schroeder, and the Isles can continue letting him develop in Europe. So more like Reinhart>Edler and Kabonov>Schroder in trade value. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.