Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

Jannik Hansen-Do we need him?


dbutcher

Recommended Posts

So I have seen allot of comments about getting rid of Hansen, various threads throughout CDC, that I have read and re read, but not posted a reply.

I gotta ask the question-- Why?

28 years old, 2.5 mill cap hit.

30-35 points per season.

Can defiantly play a shut down defensive game consistently.

has speed to burn! or has he slowed down and gotten stale like the "CORE"?

He can hit when needed, we have seen that

yes I agree he has hands of stone at times, but once a while really surprises.

So who would replace him in the bottom 6?

Does anyone remember Tortz poking Hansen on the bench early in the season? yelling at him for not back checking or something? seems like Hansen wasn't the only one to tune him out and in his mind saying "%&#^* You.

Just throwing it out there as I'm not a Hansen fanatic fan but have always appreciated the hard work the guy puts in night after night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BenDrinkin: Good point about just wanting fresh Blood in that slot.

Do you think he would accept a 4th line role?

He just seems made for 3rd line duty and we know what we get with him.

I guess training camp will answer lots of questions, I have just been very curious as to why so many long time CDC'ers and forum posters wanted him gone so easily said, like changing underwear.....................

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's a good player but we have younger and/or cheaper options. Also if we can re-sign Santorelli for ~$1.5m +/- he basically plays the same role but can also win draws (is generally more versatile).

He'd be an excellent player for a contender to pick up for their bottom 6 for the exact reasons you'd like to keep him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For me Hansen has always been one of those seemingly well liked guys in the dressing room. Works hard night in and night out. I don't see him much as a specialist in any one way, but find me more guys that play with heart 82 games of the year and I'll sign em up all day long.

I'd love to see him moved to the 4th line as a grinder type of player and have him specialize in our PK. But unfortunately we don't have the depth to replace him on the third line as of right now, unless we're going to push for some of our young up as comers to splash our lineup.

Either way, for the money I don't have a problem with him. I think there's far more important problems to fix on this team and a few more players to move before Hansen. My .02.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good post +1

A year ago he was hailed as a very good 3rd liner in the league. Lots of people even suggested he was a second line player, but most agreed he was a very good 3rd line player on a line with Higgens.

Total mismanagement by Tortz... Bring him back on to the 3rd line and he may get back to being the player most people liked a year ago, he was hardly the worst offender last season.

In saying that, not sure there is room for him, if youngsters are to be introduced into the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

J.R. good points but Santorrelli is a natural center where Hansen is a dedicated winger, and Santorelli is not signed, YET! (get it done JB)

I'm not advocating keeping him, I was really just interested in WHY so many wanted him moved.

ThaShady1 said it best I think, "far more important problems to fix"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good post +1

A year ago he was hailed as a very good 3rd liner in the league. Lots of people even suggested he was a second line player, but most agreed he was a very good 3rd line player on a line with Higgens.

Total mismanagement by Tortz... Bring him back on to the 3rd line and he may get back to being the player most people liked a year ago, he was hardly the worst offender last season.

In saying that, not sure there is room for him, if youngsters are to be introduced into the team.

Last season isn't remotely why I think he will or should be traded FWIW. I quite like him actually. But you have to give to get and we have redundancy in our bottom 6 and a need in our top 6, for a PMD and youth/prospects. If he can help fill those holes via trade...well...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's an early Burrows IMO

Hard worker, no hands, decent shot, good speed.

Honestly I'm fine with him being on the team in the third line effective checking role. Not really relying on him to produce 60+ points on the second line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...