Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

My Trading Up (Proposal)


Recommended Posts

To ANA: Kesler and Matthias for 10th, 24th, Theodore

To EDM: Tanev, Markstrom, 24th, 36th for 3rd Overall (they get a soon top 2 D, #1 goalie, and 2 picks)

To DET: Edler (retain 50%) for 1st 2014 and 2015

DRAFT:

Samuel Bennett at 3

William Nylander at 6

Haydn Fleury at 10

Robby Fabbri at 15

Bennett Nylander Kassian

Shinkaruk Horvat Fabbri

Jensen Cassels Gaunce

Fleury Theodore

Stanton Corrado

Lack

Eriksson

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To ANA: Kesler and Matthias for 10th, 24th, Theodore

To EDM: Tanev, Markstrom, 24th, 36th for 3rd Overall (they get a soon top 2 D, #1 goalie, and 2 picks)

To DET: Edler (retain 50%) for 1st 2014 and 2015

DRAFT:

Samuel Bennett at 3

William Nylander at 6

Haydn Fleury at 10

Robby Fabbri at 15

Bennett Nylander Kassian

Shinkaruk Horvat Fabbri

Jensen Cassels Gaunce

Fleury Theodore

Stanton Corrado

Lack

Eriksson

Who is the top 2 D they get? You surely can't be referring to Tanev can you?

Considering that Kassian is barely broken in. When and how do you intend to break in the other 8 rookie forwards? Where did the twins go?

I am afraid that line up is going to get beat like a drum for a long time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who is the top 2 D they get? You surely can't be referring to Tanev can you?

Considering that Kassian is barely broken in. When and how do you intend to break in the other 8 rookie forwards? Where did the twins go?

I am afraid that line up is going to get beat like a drum for a long time.

you do understand this is a prospect pool right? If your gonna call me out on something think before you respond... I don't even have 4 lines....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tanev wont be a top 2D, and its unlikely Markstrom becomes a #1. EDM doesnt make that deal, and with Edler at 50% retained cap I would rather get an impact player not draft picks.

why would you take 3 small forwards? I would take Reinhart/Draisaitl, Nylander, Fleury, Tuch

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the Kesler trade, I doubt the 2nd player would be Mathias... and if we give up a decent 2nd player, then Anaheim needs to add a player as well.

If we're sending Edler to Detroit, we've gotta get more back than just picks.

They have an excess of good prospects and no way they have roster spots for all of them.

There are some good young players / prospects that can be acquired from Detroit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. Would change Matthias to Schroeder

2. Edmonton says hell no

3. Edler says hell no.

Edler is unlikely to waive his NTC for any team at this point.

Markstrom is no where near being considered a #1 goaltender at this point. He has way more to prove. Basically you are putting him on a similar level to Cory Schneider, and I think we can all agree that Markstrom is not in his class at all. At least not at this point. Added on to that you are sending a division rival on of our best Dmen. I will say it again won't happen. If this was an eastern team, maybe but still unlikely.

edit: typos

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. Kesler could get that alone considering they where offering DSP and 10th,24th so take out Matthius

2. EDM says hell no and hangs up. just like what is said about us trading to the Ducks. if you trade in division you will have to overpay, why would EDM want to make us better?? also they have a tandum of Scrivins and Fasthk who are both better goalies now then Markstrom

3. Edlers not going anywhere.......... at least until he plays better and his value increases

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...