Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

Another one? Yes, i want Reinhart. (Proposal!)


Recommended Posts

We hunt third overall.

I really can't see Buffalo taking Reinhart 2nd. Reasons?? A) they just dragged two great Euro Center's, which Bennett would compliment well. B) Worse come to worst with those two, Bennett can move back of to C for them and take over. C) With the way they are running over there, they aren't looking for a future Bergeron, they looking for a future Patrick Marleau, who could play with a future Sidney Crosby. (McDavid)

Tanev is a great safety for any team. He has Hamhuis potential, with the offensive upside you can see in his game. He would go smoothly with Edmonton's D and F Core's. Tanev is pretty easy going and can transition well.

Gaunce has lots of opportunity to thrive in EDM. No 2-way C's. No 2 C even. Size which is needed. And offensive potential alongside Yak Ebs Hall and RNH.

And well ofcourse we have to give up 6th Overall. I wont strt.

The Trade. Brendan Gaunce, Chris Tanev, and 6th Overall for Edmonton's 3rd Overall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We hunt third overall.

I really can't see Buffalo taking Reinhart 2nd. Reasons?? A) they just dragged two great Euro Center's, which Bennett would compliment well. B) Worse come to worst with those two, Bennett can move back of to C for them and take over. C) With the way they are running over there, they aren't looking for a future Bergeron, they looking for a future Patrick Marleau, who could play with a future Sidney Crosby. (McDavid)

Tanev is a great safety for any team. He has Hamhuis potential, with the offensive upside you can see in his game. He would go smoothly with Edmonton's D and F Core's. Tanev is pretty easy going and can transition well.

Gaunce has lots of opportunity to thrive in EDM. No 2-way C's. No 2 C even. Size which is needed. And offensive potential alongside Yak Ebs Hall and RNH.

And well ofcourse we have to give up 6th Overall. I wont strt.

The Trade. Brendan Gaunce, Chris Tanev, and 6th Overall for Edmonton's 3rd Overall.

Giving up too much

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We hunt third overall.

I really can't see Buffalo taking Reinhart 2nd. Reasons?? A) they just dragged two great Euro Center's, which Bennett would compliment well. B) Worse come to worst with those two, Bennett can move back of to C for them and take over. C) With the way they are running over there, they aren't looking for a future Bergeron, they looking for a future Patrick Marleau, who could play with a future Sidney Crosby. (McDavid)

Tanev is a great safety for any team. He has Hamhuis potential, with the offensive upside you can see in his game. He would go smoothly with Edmonton's D and F Core's. Tanev is pretty easy going and can transition well.

Gaunce has lots of opportunity to thrive in EDM. No 2-way C's. No 2 C even. Size which is needed. And offensive potential alongside Yak Ebs Hall and RNH.

And well ofcourse we have to give up 6th Overall. I wont strt.

The Trade. Brendan Gaunce, Chris Tanev, and 6th Overall for Edmonton's 3rd Overall.

Gaunce can be cut out from that trade. Tanev & 6th should be enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We get killed. Take out tanev and then maybe. Why does everybody underrate tanev so much?

It's more people underrating the top 5 picks or overrating the 6th pick. Tanev's a future top 4 shutdown guy and being traded with a most likely second liner (6th overall) for a first line center (Reinhart).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's more people underrating the top 5 picks or overrating the 6th pick. Tanev's a future top 4 shutdown guy and being traded with a most likely second liner (6th overall) for a first line center (Reinhart).

Ok that's possible but anyone I the top 10 has the potential to be either a first line player or a bust aside from ekblad. You could get Nylander at 6th and he could be better then Bennett of Reinhart at 2nd or 3rd. Yoincould get Virtanen at 10th and he could be better then Bennett. The top 10 this year is a huge gamble. I wouldn't trade tanev who is a sure thing and is already amazing to move up 3 spots where you might get a worse player then at 6th. It just makes no sense to me. If I'm trading Tanev and 6th I want 1st overall so I can get Ekblad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PHI: Kesler, 1st (6)

FLA/BUF: Schenn, Schenn

VAN: Reinhart, 1st (17)

?

Think about that for a minute, if you would have the 1st/2nd pick overall, would you really trade it for both Schenn's ???

Come on.

And Philly Trade both Schenn's, 1st round pick for Kesler and 6th overall? They'd take it and run!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...