jptony604 Posted June 6, 2014 Share Posted June 6, 2014 Alright guys go easy on me. Haven't posted much on here but been watching thw boards for a while. I think with the needs that each teams have it will have to be a 3 way deal in order for soemthing to happen at the draft. To Van: 3rd (great chance we draft the player we want) To Edm: 1st, Schroeder (get Ekbald and B level prospect) To Fla: Yakupov, Corrado, 6th (get an explosive winger, D prospect and a pick to get Ehlers) Let me know what you think guys. Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Strome Posted June 6, 2014 Share Posted June 6, 2014 I'm having trouble focusing atm but that seems like a decent proposal. Somehow you made it work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlyLow_ Posted June 6, 2014 Share Posted June 6, 2014 This is the only way I see us moving up at the draft, but you have us sending players with little to no value(right now anyways). That's not going to get it done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Strome Posted June 6, 2014 Share Posted June 6, 2014 Also I think edmonton needs to rid themselves of yak, not a good fit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wiznac Posted June 6, 2014 Share Posted June 6, 2014 Van gives up 6th overall Corrado and Schroeder for the 3rd overall? You could probably just cut out Florida in this trade.if we wanted the 3rd pick then we could make a deal with EDM directly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Strome Posted June 6, 2014 Share Posted June 6, 2014 This is the only way I see us moving up at the draft, but you have us sending players with little to no value(right now anyways). That's not going to get it done.This is what puzzled me but somehow he made it work Probably cause it's what each team covets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jptony604 Posted June 6, 2014 Author Share Posted June 6, 2014 Van gives up 6th overall Corrado and Schroeder for the 3rd overall? You could probably just cut out Florida in this trade.if we wanted the 3rd pick then we could make a deal with EDM directly But the whole point in the deal is for Edm to draft Ekblad at 1st. They need that franchise D-man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canucks155 Posted June 6, 2014 Share Posted June 6, 2014 You're going to have to take out Corrado and put in Tanev instead for this to work. Not sure Edm moves yak this early in his career. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Strome Posted June 6, 2014 Share Posted June 6, 2014 But the whole point in the deal is for Edm to draft Ekblad at 1st. They need that franchise D-man This Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jptony604 Posted June 6, 2014 Author Share Posted June 6, 2014 This is the only way I see us moving up at the draft, but you have us sending players with little to no value(right now anyways). That's not going to get it done. I thought about it but sending our 6th + Tanev is an overpayment on our side to move 3 spots up. The board would be all over me, callin me crazy. Corrado is also a very good propect thats probably NHL ready. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Strome Posted June 6, 2014 Share Posted June 6, 2014 You're going to have to take out Corrado and put in Tanev instead for this to work. Not sure Edm moves yak this early in his career. They should if it means ekblad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Strome Posted June 6, 2014 Share Posted June 6, 2014 You know for the last month or so I have wondered if a yak for bogo deal would work Then draft away at 3rd oa Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex Burrows 14 Posted June 6, 2014 Share Posted June 6, 2014 Switch corrado to the oilers instead of Florida and its pretty good actually. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.53 Posted June 6, 2014 Share Posted June 6, 2014 Not bad honestly. Every team gets what they want and we don't give up too much. Overall I say quality proposal. However, I still don't think Edmonton does this for one reason. I don't even think Ekbald is worth Yakupov (a recent first overall pick) and a third overall pick. I understand they get a b level prospect back too in schroeder, but I think they are going to want a little more. Yak still has a lot of potential, he just struggled this year. In another trade, yak could get them much more return. See what I'm saying? But still, I think quality proposal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForsbergTheGreat Posted June 6, 2014 Share Posted June 6, 2014 Yak and a third overall should get them more in return. They also have no need for another small center. Change Schroeder to higgins/hansen and were getting closers but still not there yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canucks155 Posted June 6, 2014 Share Posted June 6, 2014 They should if it means ekblad Remember, they took Yak over Murray. They're not going to throw away a 1st ovr pick just to improve their defense. I think they'd rather trade Gagner and Florida would still accept as long as Gagner waived. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.53 Posted June 6, 2014 Share Posted June 6, 2014 Remember, they took Yak over Murray. They're not going to throw away a 1st ovr pick just to improve their defense. I think they'd rather trade Gagner and Florida would still accept as long as Gagner waived. Good point. That would even up their value in edm part VAN loses: Corrado, Schroeder 6th VAN gains: Reinhart? (3) EDM loses: Gagner, 3rd EDM gains: Ekbald (1), Schroeder FLO loses: 1st FLO gains: Gagner, Corrado, Ehlers? (6) Good deal for everyone involved. I like it a lot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jptony604 Posted June 6, 2014 Author Share Posted June 6, 2014 Good point. That would even up their value in edm part VAN loses: Corrado, Schroeder 6th VAN gains: Reinhart? (3) EDM loses: Gagner, 3rd EDM gains: Ekbald (1), Schroeder FLO loses: 1st FLO gains: Gagner, Corrado, Ehlers? (6) Good deal for everyone involved. I like it a lot. yeah i think it sounds good. Really the best part is canucks arent selling the farm to get the player they want. Benning would look like a genious if he pulled off something along those lines. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuxfanabroad Posted June 6, 2014 Share Posted June 6, 2014 It's pretty darn shrewd as value goes..nice work & rather creative. From Van's pov I kaibosh it due to Nylander's emergence(seems now there's a top-6!). A proposal like this with TO or Win taking our place(& adding a touch more) would prob work nicely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timberz21 Posted June 6, 2014 Share Posted June 6, 2014 I know Yakupov is not living up to expectation, but EDM would be trading a former 1st overall and 3rd overall for a 1st overall. Thats a big price to move up 2 spots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.