VanCanuck1997 Posted June 8, 2014 Share Posted June 8, 2014 It seems as if the leafs are willing to move a multiple amount of players what would it take to acquire jvr? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toews Posted June 8, 2014 Share Posted June 8, 2014 He might be available but I doubt he moves. He is still young and his contract is a bargain. The price probably starts with Horvat and add from there. Don't think the Canucks are in a position to give up significant assets to acquire him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shiznak Posted June 8, 2014 Share Posted June 8, 2014 Mid-level prospect (Gaunce or Jensen), young role player (Hansen or Matthias), and high second pick (36th). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toews Posted June 8, 2014 Share Posted June 8, 2014 Mid-level prospect (Gaunce or Jensen), young role player (Hansen or Matthias), and high second pick (36th). That is pretty awful. That won't even get you on the phone with Nonis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Otis Posted June 8, 2014 Share Posted June 8, 2014 JvR would be a sick addition. We don't really have the pieces to get it done other than Kes and he wouldn't want to go to TO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shiznak Posted June 8, 2014 Share Posted June 8, 2014 That is pretty awful. That won't even get you on the phone with Nonis. You're right, that is an awful deal, but that's because I don't value JVR that high. He's inconsistent and most of his success comes from playing with Kessel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DownUndaCanuck Posted June 8, 2014 Share Posted June 8, 2014 I'd do something like Garrison + Horvat + Hansen + 6th overall for Phaneuf and JVR and just go for it next season. Sign Hiller to a 4M deal, buyout Booth if we have to, otherwise: Sedin - Sedin - JVR Kassian - Kesler - Higgins Jensen - Santorelli - Burrows Booth - Richardson - Matthias Edler - Tanev Hamhuis - Phaneuf Bieksa - Stanton Weber/Corrado Hiller Lack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MayRayDown Posted June 8, 2014 Share Posted June 8, 2014 I'd do something like Garrison + Horvat + Hansen + 6th overall for Phaneuf and JVR and just go for it next season. Sign Hiller to a 4M deal, buyout Booth if we have to, otherwise: Sedin - Sedin - JVR Kassian - Kesler - Higgins Jensen - Santorelli - Burrows Booth - Richardson - Matthias Edler - Tanev Hamhuis - Phaneuf Bieksa - Stanton Weber/Corrado Hiller Lack Goodbye future Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pavel_Burrows Posted June 8, 2014 Share Posted June 8, 2014 No thank you. TO can keep JVR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caboose Posted June 8, 2014 Share Posted June 8, 2014 Coyle and Surgeon I'd be happy with. Not sure if Minny would say yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tangelos Posted June 8, 2014 Share Posted June 8, 2014 Kesler + Tanev. Maybe more 24 year old power forward on a stellar contract isn't going to be cheap Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gross-Misconduct Posted June 8, 2014 Share Posted June 8, 2014 Would love JVR here. But it would take a lot to get him. A package deal with Kes might be acceptable on TO's side but doubt Kelser would go there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Strome Posted June 8, 2014 Share Posted June 8, 2014 Mid-level prospect (Gaunce or Jensen), young role player (Hansen or Matthias), and high second pick (36th). Lmao 30 goal scoring pwf on a great contract and only 25. Yet Kesler is worth 2 1st rounders and a top end prospect? Cdc is hilarious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Strome Posted June 8, 2014 Share Posted June 8, 2014 You're right, that is an awful deal, but that's because I don't value JVR that high. He's inconsistent and most of his success comes from playing with Kessel. What you value him at is irrelevant. Your proposal is laughable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Strome Posted June 8, 2014 Share Posted June 8, 2014 Coyle and Surgeon I'd be happy with. Not sure if Minny would say yes. I'm thinking Nonis price will be high. He wants teams to over pay. Otherwise makes no sense to trade him. He's the 2nd best forward on your team. 25 year old 30/30 guys aren't that easy to find. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MayRayDown Posted June 8, 2014 Share Posted June 8, 2014 He has his 2nd 20+ goal season and first 50+ point season and people are saying he is worth kesler+Tanev? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.53 Posted June 8, 2014 Share Posted June 8, 2014 I think his value is similar to Keslers. However, the contract just makes him super valuable. Similar to Wayne Simmonds. The contract is just too good that it ups his value big time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caboose Posted June 8, 2014 Share Posted June 8, 2014 I'm thinking Nonis price will be high. He wants teams to over pay. Otherwise makes no sense to trade him. He's the 2nd best forward on your team. 25 year old 30/30 guys aren't that easy to find. Maybe add in a guy like Zucker? Really like him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Strome Posted June 8, 2014 Share Posted June 8, 2014 He has his 2nd 20+ goal season and first 50+ point season and people are saying he is worth kesler+Tanev? By 20+ I'll assume you mean 30 goals right? Not to mention, he's 25, how many goals should he have? Pretty young player. Not sure you are to familiar with Jvr. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Strome Posted June 8, 2014 Share Posted June 8, 2014 Maybe add in a guy like Zucker? Really like him. I know the thread is a debate on his value however I think it would be a mistake to trade him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.