bobby loocid dreamer Posted June 11, 2014 Share Posted June 11, 2014 I know your girlfriends and wives would agree but lets stick with hockey. As an armchair GM, I have been trying to come up with a return that would make everyone happy but no team that wants him has exactly what I want in order to give up Kes. So of course, a 3 way trade makes sense and going through the latest proposals I have not seen any. So here are a couple. To VAN: Nazem Kadri, Tor 2014 1st (8th overall). To TOR: James Neal, Pit 2015 2nd, Van 2014 4th To PIT: Ryan Kesler WHY? I think every team is happy with what they get. Toronto gets a significantly better scorer and well rounded player and give up a very good pick but outside the top 5 (where the star power is). Vancouver replaces Kesler and lands a very good pick that they need for the slow rebuild. Pittsburgh returns to the powerhouse they were with strength down the middle. To VAN: Derek Stepan, prospect Jesper Fast (NYR), 2014 1st (NYR) 2015 3rd (ANA) To ANA: Kesler To NYR: Kyle Palmieri, Luca Sbisa, 2014 3rd (VAN) WHY? NYR gets stronger at wing, stronger on the back end and picks up an extra pick this year. Anaheim gets Kesler. We get a good C to replace Kes, in addition to that prospect and a 1st they desire. So from what I can see, a 3 way makes more sense than a straight across trade. Lets go Benning. Make it happen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piggy Bank Posted June 11, 2014 Share Posted June 11, 2014 NYR get merked Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aladeen Posted June 11, 2014 Share Posted June 11, 2014 Title sounds dirty! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdatb Posted June 11, 2014 Share Posted June 11, 2014 Title sounds dirty! wait till you begin reading the proposal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ken kaniff Posted June 11, 2014 Share Posted June 11, 2014 Both are really bad. Neal has more value than Keeler.And Rangers get destroyed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aladeen Posted June 11, 2014 Share Posted June 11, 2014 wait till you begin reading the proposal you're right! those are some dirty proposals Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tangelos Posted June 11, 2014 Share Posted June 11, 2014 Lateral move for Pitsburgh, except they get fleeced in the future cause Neal is younger. Leafs have poor Center depth and several wingers so they'd decline. Great deal for us. Second trade. Great for Ducks and Canucks. rangers get absolutely penetrated without lubrication. Just terrible Surprise surprise, canucks end up on top in yet another CDC trade proposal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wheels22 Posted June 11, 2014 Share Posted June 11, 2014 I only came for the title.. If you know what I mean Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gross-Misconduct Posted June 11, 2014 Share Posted June 11, 2014 I know your girlfriends and wives would agree but lets stick with hockey. What about BFs? There are girls on this site also you know. And probably homosexuals that wouldn't mind either. Kesler isn't my type though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smithers joe Posted June 11, 2014 Share Posted June 11, 2014 no to kadri. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-AJ- Posted June 12, 2014 Share Posted June 12, 2014 My brain is clearly still too dirty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
asian player Posted June 12, 2014 Share Posted June 12, 2014 Didn't even read the proposal but I volunteer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nuckster33 Posted June 12, 2014 Share Posted June 12, 2014 oh doooont be durty Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.