Hairy Kneel Posted November 3, 2016 Share Posted November 3, 2016 10 hours ago, Nicklas Bo Hunter said: I just can't believe they keep going with Sbisa- Larsen even though they do not work together. Larsen had a tough game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted November 3, 2016 Share Posted November 3, 2016 Sending a cold Tryamkin out there against the best team in the league who is also VERY fast was not going to get us a W in this game guys.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted November 3, 2016 Share Posted November 3, 2016 9 hours ago, pomorick said: Mentally challenged:) I think the new PC is cognitively-alternately abled? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lancaster Posted November 3, 2016 Share Posted November 3, 2016 1 hour ago, J.R. said: Sending a cold Tryamkin out there against the best team in the league who is also VERY fast was not going to get us a W in this game guys.... But with that mentality, they'll never send the kid in. Against good team -> not fair for Tryamkim go up against a top tier team Against average team -> the Canucks will be battling them for playoff spot, so too important to risk sending in Tryamkin Against poor team -> the team really need to capitalize on an easy two-pointer, can't risk using Tryamkin 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted November 3, 2016 Share Posted November 3, 2016 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Lancaster said: But with that mentality, they'll never send the kid in. Against good team -> not fair for Tryamkim go up against a top tier team Against average team -> the Canucks will be battling them for playoff spot, so too important to risk sending in Tryamkin Against poor team -> the team really need to capitalize on an easy two-pointer, can't risk using Tryamkin If his conditioning was up to par, they probably would have loved to put him in vs LAK and/or ANA. It wasn't. Now that it apparently is, he'll likely only see time with an injury to Sbisa or Gudbranson or against bigger teams where he'd be more beneficial. My guess is they've got him penciled in against NYR on Tues. which is also the 2nd of a back to back. So he'll be able to fill in for some tired legs and help out against a larger team. Edited November 3, 2016 by J.R. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boudrias Posted November 3, 2016 Share Posted November 3, 2016 1 hour ago, J.R. said: If his conditioning was up to par, they probably would have loved to put him in vs LAK and/or ANA. It wasn't. Now that it apparently is, he'll likely only see time with an injury to Sbisa or Gudbranson or against bigger teams where he'd be more beneficial. My guess is they've got him penciled in against NYR on Tues. which is also the 2nd of a back to back. So he'll be able to fill in for some tired legs and help out against a larger team. You're likely right. To bad that he did not get in earlier but it appears that coaching has set some goals for Tryamkin and he has met the challenge. Also appreciate that his disagreement with the move down to Utica never got the personal input that Jake's complaining did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted November 3, 2016 Share Posted November 3, 2016 (edited) There you go. Injury and a back to back game and he's in. Edited November 3, 2016 by J.R. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the harry Posted November 3, 2016 Share Posted November 3, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aliboy Posted November 3, 2016 Share Posted November 3, 2016 (edited) About Kraken time! Edited November 3, 2016 by aliboy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hairy Kneel Posted November 3, 2016 Share Posted November 3, 2016 Tryamkin and Biega would be good. Sit Larsen and bring back some snarl. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cramarossa Posted November 3, 2016 Share Posted November 3, 2016 Y'all have pumped him up so much...hope he meets expectations tonight... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canorth Posted November 4, 2016 Share Posted November 4, 2016 Hows he doing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canorth Posted November 4, 2016 Share Posted November 4, 2016 2 minutes ago, The 5th Line said: Played good. I think we might have something with Tryamkin, he definitely has a lot to work on especially his conditioning, he was still getting gassed out there but he was physical all night which was great to see. I thought Sbisa played one of his better games tonight as well. Coincidence? Good to hear, thanks. Some of my highlights from last year were him tossing guys around...ability to physically dominate that I've never seen in a Canucks uniform before. It will be interesting see what he can do once he gets that cardio straightened out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green Building Posted November 4, 2016 Share Posted November 4, 2016 27 minutes ago, The 5th Line said: Played good. I think we might have something with Tryamkin, he definitely has a lot to work on especially his conditioning, he was still getting gassed out there but he was physical all night which was great to see. I thought Sbisa played one of his better games tonight as well. Coincidence? He failed to connect on several low % passes in his own zone that resulted in a few poor turnovers. Having said that, he wasn't the only dman to fall victim to that, Edler made some absolutely pitiful plays. Tryamkin is young though and as you put it, has a lot to work on. I'm willing to be patient with him for quite a while as long as there are general signs of improvement over the next few years. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green Building Posted November 4, 2016 Share Posted November 4, 2016 53 minutes ago, The 5th Line said: Yeah he's not much of a puck mover, that is obvious. He often just rims it around the boards or flips it out to center but if he can be physical around our net it's a win for us. I also noticed some of his turnovers were at the end of his shifts, his poor conditioning effects him physically and mentally. I'd prefer the ring around or flip to some of the lazy passes I saw today, at least the turnover is well away from your own zone and a change can happen. His physicality is very much welcomed, but he certainly needs to be in game shape. It's a shame he didn't take the conditioning stint when asked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N4ZZY Posted November 4, 2016 Share Posted November 4, 2016 On 10/31/2016 at 9:29 PM, Alflives said: are you sure it's a NO? NO still even. haha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N4ZZY Posted November 4, 2016 Share Posted November 4, 2016 2 hours ago, Green Building said: He failed to connect on several low % passes in his own zone that resulted in a few poor turnovers. Having said that, he wasn't the only dman to fall victim to that, Edler made some absolutely pitiful plays. Tryamkin is young though and as you put it, has a lot to work on. I'm willing to be patient with him for quite a while as long as there are general signs of improvement over the next few years. There's no excuse for him not to come to camp in shape. If he has poor conditioning next year, then I have serious questions about his character and willingness to put in the work to get better. Being big is one thing, but if you don't have the work ethic to go with it, then big for nothing. Tryamkin isn't the second coming of Chara. They have size in common, but let's see if Tryamkin can excel where Chara has excelled. I'd be willing to be patient with him as well. But if he's not improving, cut him loose and allow him to be someone else's project. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N4ZZY Posted November 4, 2016 Share Posted November 4, 2016 By the way. How did Tryamkin play tonight? Thoughts? Insights? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SilentSam Posted November 4, 2016 Share Posted November 4, 2016 7 hours ago, the harry said: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green Building Posted November 4, 2016 Share Posted November 4, 2016 3 hours ago, The 5th Line said: Played good. I think we might have something with Tryamkin, he definitely has a lot to work on especially his conditioning, he was still getting gassed out there but he was physical all night which was great to see. I thought Sbisa played one of his better games tonight as well. Coincidence? 2 hours ago, Green Building said: He failed to connect on several low % passes in his own zone that resulted in a few poor turnovers. Having said that, he wasn't the only dman to fall victim to that, Edler made some absolutely pitiful plays. Tryamkin is young though and as you put it, has a lot to work on. I'm willing to be patient with him for quite a while as long as there are general signs of improvement over the next few years. 2 hours ago, The 5th Line said: Yeah he's not much of a puck mover, that is obvious. He often just rims it around the boards or flips it out to center but if he can be physical around our net it's a win for us. I also noticed some of his turnovers were at the end of his shifts, his poor conditioning effects him physically and mentally. 1 hour ago, Green Building said: I'd prefer the ring around or flip to some of the lazy passes I saw today, at least the turnover is well away from your own zone and a change can happen. His physicality is very much welcomed, but he certainly needs to be in game shape. It's a shame he didn't take the conditioning stint when asked. ^ see above 15 minutes ago, N4ZZY said: By the way. How did Tryamkin play tonight? Thoughts? Insights? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now