SilentSam Posted January 28, 2019 Share Posted January 28, 2019 34 minutes ago, 40Dangles said: Boeser left circle for a one timer Hughes point Petey Right 1/2 boards controlling Try parked in front Bo as the rover That's one hell of a first PP Big attracts Big in front of the crease.. imagine the size of the screen Tryamkin would attract, let alone create. 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40Dangles Posted January 28, 2019 Share Posted January 28, 2019 (edited) 2 hours ago, SilentSam said: Big attracts Big in front of the crease.. imagine the size of the screen Tryamkin would attract, let alone create. And he basically can just take up all the space and who's going to even have a chance to move him. Boston used Chara there often and it was quite effective. And Try is more mobile than chara ever was. Edited January 28, 2019 by 40Dangles 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LowerMainLander18 Posted January 28, 2019 Share Posted January 28, 2019 Tryampkin + Hughes > Chara + McAvoy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe_Kerr Posted January 28, 2019 Share Posted January 28, 2019 16 hours ago, Borvat said: I wonder how it would go now with Greene coaching the team? I am not supporting the previous regimes methods or how things went down, but I am curious how Tryamkin would deal with the existing regime. Greene expects certain things and buy in from his players or they get to spend time "watching." We have see this with numerous players. Some several times and counting. How would Tryamkin react to all the video sessions, extra one on one practices, sitting out games, missing prolonged periods of a game when Greene will bench/sit players if their play was not deserving of ice time? Greene does employ some tough love at times. I am not certain things would fair much better unless Tryamkin is prepared to put in the work and check his ego/expectations. It would be a bad thing for team chemistry and what they are trying to build if he cant. I think the difference would be Green has good communication and good reasons, so the play who sits out knows why they are sitting, as do most of us fans. With Willie it wasn't so much like that. I think it was goldie who scored his first nhl goal then sat for the rest of the game for who knows why, even Tryamkin mention this once in one of his interviews since he left. Tryamkin was sat when he first arrived because his conditioning wasn't up to snuff. Did he pout? No he worked his butt off and got into game shape. So I think when he comes back he's going to be a good player for us, Green properly pushing his deficiencies and Tree getting better in return. Also I just love him as a player haha Such a unique mix of huge size and good mobility 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boudrias Posted January 28, 2019 Share Posted January 28, 2019 14 hours ago, SilentSam said: I think his game (and it’s good) in the KHL might be plateauing,. Might thought process behind this is the size of the ice surface.. the bigger ice leaves playmaking almost telegraphic,. There is a predictability with so much room. I do think that Tryamkins game here in NAmerica would take two steps forward,. he is too fast for it not to.. his gap coverage usually ends up punishing. we saw that here. I am a tad more tentative on Tryamkin than you are. Sayin that I realize that the Canucks have to get bigger so luring him back for another NHL crack would be worth it. If he made a successful comeback it changes the whole back end in a major way. I consider the timeline to CUP competition 3 years away. Tryamkin comes back and integrates well and that time frame shrinks a year at least. 1 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post SilentSam Posted January 28, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted January 28, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, Boudrias said: I am a tad more tentative on Tryamkin than you are. Sayin that I realize that the Canucks have to get bigger so luring him back for another NHL crack would be worth it. If he made a successful comeback it changes the whole back end in a major way. I consider the timeline to CUP competition 3 years away. Tryamkin comes back and integrates well and that time frame shrinks a year at least. I can understand people feeling tentative about Tryamkin because he left.. but he is not lost. To have the rights to a Power D like Tryamkin is a bird in the hand Boud’s. .. and we have a list of potential D’s on the rise to compliment. Its the opportunity to have Tryamkin here that should perused hard. I have never seen a rookie D man (21-22yrs) that size perform with that kind of power strength, speed and agility. There might be 4-5 other D men in the NHL like him.. but they are vets. We have to Persue this kid, he will realize very soon that the NHL IS his ultimate dream, and the money to go with that will give him a nice early retirement and other great opportunities.. he just needs to know he is needed and he can find a home here for more than a single year.. not an apartment across from the 420 party. Edited January 28, 2019 by SilentSam 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HockeyHarry Posted February 4, 2019 Share Posted February 4, 2019 Any word on Tryamkin lately, how’s he been playing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hairy Kneel Posted February 4, 2019 Share Posted February 4, 2019 (edited) 2 hours ago, HockeyHarry said: Any word on Tryamkin lately, how’s he been playing? I missed today's game (they lost 3-2 to MMG, Tryamkin with 5 SOG) Last couple of games I caught the last two periods of each and the way I would describe his play is steady eddie, nothing flashy (although 2 games ago he did have a beauty stretch pass). He's on the PK 1, On the KHL ice I think his reach is one of his biggest weapons. It's harder to get the huge hits like here. One thing I like is how he keeps the puck in the zone. Manages his blueline well, because of his size it's harder for their forwards to push him out of the zone. He keeps plays alive for a bit longer. I think Atvo they are just kind of coasting right now as they are guaranteed a playoff spot. Edited February 4, 2019 by Hairy Kneel 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HockeyHarry Posted February 5, 2019 Share Posted February 5, 2019 Thx for Tryamkins play update much appreciated 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 6, 2019 Share Posted February 6, 2019 NHL Defensemen, aged 23-26, 6'4 or taller Let's look at the Defensemen that have already proven themselves in the NHL and ignore the guys that haven't earned regular playing time. Let's also ignore the top 4 guys on that list who are clearly better then Tryamkin (Dougie Hamilton, Parayko, Seth Jones and Ristolainen). The salary ranges between 2.15 mil/season to 3.85 mil/season so based on that I think that Tryamkin will get about 3.5 mil/season if he does choose to come back in a year and a half. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Borvat Posted February 6, 2019 Share Posted February 6, 2019 (edited) 20 hours ago, VancouverHabitant said: NHL Defensemen, aged 23-26, 6'4 or taller Let's look at the Defensemen that have already proven themselves in the NHL and ignore the guys that haven't earned regular playing time. Let's also ignore the top 4 guys on that list who are clearly better then Tryamkin (Dougie Hamilton, Parayko, Seth Jones and Ristolainen). The salary ranges between 2.15 mil/season to 3.85 mil/season so based on that I think that Tryamkin will get about 3.5 mil/season if he does choose to come back in a year and a half. That's approx. USD $44,304.00 per inch. Sounds about right but doesn't compare to the $2,914,304.00 Rubles per inch in the KHL. Edited February 6, 2019 by Borvat 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 12, 2019 Share Posted February 12, 2019 Okay, go ahead and explain to me after the Sharks game that Tryamkin will not be able to crack this Canucks' defence in a year or two. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
viking mama Posted February 12, 2019 Share Posted February 12, 2019 (edited) 54 minutes ago, VancouverHabitant said: Okay, go ahead and explain to me after the Sharks game that Tryamkin will not be able to crack this Canucks' defence in a year or two. Yup. What do we have to do to tempt, lure, & attract Tryamkin back to stay & be happy doing so? Edited February 12, 2019 by viking mama 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted February 12, 2019 Share Posted February 12, 2019 1 hour ago, VancouverHabitant said: Okay, go ahead and explain to me after the Sharks game that Tryamkin will not be able to crack this Canucks' defence in a year or two. In fairness, that's without Edler, Hughes, Juolevi, Brisebois or a possible UFA or trade. It's likely going to be far more crowded and harder to crack than it is today and with Edler out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elias Pettersson Posted February 12, 2019 Share Posted February 12, 2019 11 hours ago, VancouverHabitant said: Okay, go ahead and explain to me after the Sharks game that Tryamkin will not be able to crack this Canucks' defence in a year or two. He'd be on our first pairing with Edler if it was up to me. Worst case second pairing with Hutton. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SilentSam Posted February 12, 2019 Share Posted February 12, 2019 This team has always needed a proven #1 D man. Neither Edler or Tanev are #1’s.. barely #2’ s at times. Hughes is not here, or proven at this level, nor Joulevi, Brisboise, Rathbone or Woo. UFA is the only way to address this problem, or wait 3-5 years for the possibility of a prospect being that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted February 12, 2019 Share Posted February 12, 2019 3 hours ago, SilentSam said: This team has always needed a proven #1 D man. Neither Edler or Tanev are #1’s.. barely #2’ s at times. Hughes is not here, or proven at this level, nor Joulevi, Brisboise, Rathbone or Woo. UFA is the only way to address this problem, or wait 3-5 years for the possibility of a prospect being that. So... Karlsson. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kootenay Gold Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 36 minutes ago, aGENT said: So... Karlsson. Can you just imagine what a difference he would make to the defense corps of the Canucks. If JB could pull that off it would be another one of his crowning achievements. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maniwaki Canuck Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 2 minutes ago, Kootenay Gold said: Can you just imagine what a difference he would make to the defense corps of the Canucks. If JB could pull that off it would be another one of his crowning achievements. If it happens, it will be because of Pettersson! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 1 minute ago, Kootenay Gold said: Can you just imagine what a difference he would make to the defense corps of the Canucks. If JB could pull that off it would be another one of his crowning achievements. I'm 98% sure he's extending in SJS but I'd absolutely LOVE it if he came here. Adding him and Hughes in one summer would absolutely revolutionize our D and with Juolevi hopefully not far behind... 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now