SilentSam Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 34 minutes ago, goalie13 said: It's true. He is not currently under contract with the Canucks, so that makes him a former Canuck. The Canucks hold his rights for 2-3 more years.. if your talking NHL until we lose his rights,. He is a Canuck. 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Chickenspear Posted September 17, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted September 17, 2019 3 hours ago, goalie13 said: It's true. He is not currently under contract with the Canucks, so that makes him a former Canuck. So long as he's in the system, he's one of us. That makes him a Canuck without a contract. 1 3 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted September 18, 2019 Share Posted September 18, 2019 1 hour ago, Chickenspear said: So long as he's in the system, he's one of us. That makes him a Canuck without a contract. Yup. Tryamkin is no different than Brock was before he just signed. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WeneedLumme Posted September 18, 2019 Share Posted September 18, 2019 18 hours ago, goalie13 said: It's true. He is not currently under contract with the Canucks, so that makes him a former Canuck. So until Brock signed, in your mind BB was a former Canuck because his contract had expired? And Pod and Hog are not Canucks because they haven't yet signed contracts with the team? Yeah, no. As long as the Canucks own their rights, they are Canucks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stierlitz Posted September 23, 2019 Share Posted September 23, 2019 Avto was the only undefeated team in the KHL until the last game vs Spartak, Moscow when the former lost 2-4. Avto is still on the 1st place in the Eastern Conference with 16 points in 9 games. Tryamkin played 18:15 with 2-min penalty for high stick and -1. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theo5789 Posted September 23, 2019 Share Posted September 23, 2019 10 hours ago, Stierlitz said: Avto was the only undefeated team in the KHL until the last game vs Spartak, Moscow when the former lost 2-4. Avto is still on the 1st place in the Eastern Conference with 16 points in 9 games. Tryamkin played 18:15 with 2-min penalty for high stick and -1. If they continue to play well, we might not see the big guy until next season (which could be a good thing). Hopefully he gets a championship under his belt and he will feel more accomplished and ready for a new challenge. Just curious, do you know if he has a regular D partner with Avto? Just wondering if he's generally set to playing one side or the other and who they partner him with (more offensive type guys, etc). 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SilentSam Posted September 23, 2019 Share Posted September 23, 2019 26 minutes ago, theo5789 said: If they continue to play well, we might not see the big guy until next season (which could be a good thing). Hopefully he gets a championship under his belt and he will feel more accomplished and ready for a new challenge. Just curious, do you know if he has a regular D partner with Avto? Just wondering if he's generally set to playing one side or the other and who they partner him with (more offensive type guys, etc). Although to see him rotate in or fill in for injuries for our playoffs would be fun to watch. The good thing that comes from Niks leave from the Canucks , is that he is ineligible for the Seattle extortion draft. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stierlitz Posted September 24, 2019 Share Posted September 24, 2019 1 hour ago, theo5789 said: Just curious, do you know if he has a regular D partner with Avto? Just wondering if he's generally set to playing one side or the other and who they partner him with (more offensive type guys, etc). Most games Tryamkin is partnered with defensive defenceman Maxim Berezin (29 y.o., 6'3", 215) who plays on left side. 3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RetroCanuck Posted September 24, 2019 Share Posted September 24, 2019 1 hour ago, SilentSam said: Although to see him rotate in or fill in for injuries for our playoffs would be fun to watch. The good thing that comes from Niks leave from the Canucks , is that he is ineligible for the Seattle extortion draft. Why is that? Doesn't he have the required amount of professional games? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WeneedLumme Posted September 24, 2019 Share Posted September 24, 2019 1 hour ago, SilentSam said: Although to see him rotate in or fill in for injuries for our playoffs would be fun to watch. The good thing that comes from Niks leave from the Canucks , is that he is ineligible for the Seattle extortion draft. I believe you are mistaken about the ED. Pretty sure that Tram is eligible. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SilentSam Posted September 24, 2019 Share Posted September 24, 2019 10 minutes ago, RetroCanuck said: Why is that? Doesn't he have the required amount of professional games? I believe roster time over the past two years is the criteria? Someone please correct me if I’m wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SilentSam Posted September 24, 2019 Share Posted September 24, 2019 (edited) 12 minutes ago, WeneedLumme said: I believe you are mistaken about the ED. Pretty sure that Tram is eligible. Just read it on NHL .com.. all first and second year NHL players, all unsigned draft picks are exempt and not counted as “protected”. sorry couldn’t paste or copy from the link. Nik is a one year guy I beleive. Edited September 24, 2019 by SilentSam 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theo5789 Posted September 24, 2019 Share Posted September 24, 2019 3 hours ago, Stierlitz said: Most games Tryamkin is partnered with defensive defenceman Maxim Berezin (29 y.o., 6'3", 215) who plays on left side. So perhaps he would be suited to be partnered with Benn if/when he arrives. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SilentSam Posted September 24, 2019 Share Posted September 24, 2019 (edited) 4 hours ago, RetroCanuck said: Why is that? Doesn't he have the required amount of professional games? Just read it on NHL .com.. all first and second year NHL players, all unsigned draft picks are exempt and not counted as “protected”. Nik is a one year guy I believe. https://www.nhl.com/news/seattle-2021-nhl-expansion-draft-rules-same-as-vegas-golden-knights-followed/c-302586918 Edited September 24, 2019 by SilentSam 3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J.I.A.H.N Posted September 24, 2019 Share Posted September 24, 2019 1 hour ago, SilentSam said: Just read it on NHL .com.. all first and second year NHL players, all unsigned draft picks are exempt and not counted as “protected”. Nik is a one year guy I believe. https://www.nhl.com/news/seattle-2021-nhl-expansion-draft-rules-same-as-vegas-golden-knights-followed/c-302586918 So...…..Tryamkin played 13 games the first year 66 games the second does that only count as 1 year? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SID.IS.SID.ME.IS.ME Posted September 24, 2019 Share Posted September 24, 2019 30 minutes ago, janisahockeynut said: So...…..Tryamkin played 13 games the first year 66 games the second does that only count as 1 year? Counts as two pro years, so he’s expansion draft eligible. Even if he’s still not under contract, Seattle would be eligible to negotiate with him as part of the expansion draft’s free agent window, and if they reached an agreement, that contract would count as an expansion draft pick. Doesn’t really matter though, as I doubt Tryamkin will be the guy we lose in the expansion draft. We’ll have other players exposed that will be considered much “safer” picks for Seattle. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Canuck #12 Posted September 24, 2019 Share Posted September 24, 2019 We might have safer picks available, but in an expansion draft Seattle may well go for a player with greater upside-- that is, go for the homerun with Tryamkin. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snapshot85 Posted September 24, 2019 Share Posted September 24, 2019 1 hour ago, janisahockeynut said: So...…..Tryamkin played 13 games the first year 66 games the second does that only count as 1 year? 15 minutes ago, Captain Canuck #12 said: We might have safer picks available, but in an expansion draft Seattle may well go for a player with greater upside-- that is, go for the homerun with Tryamkin. 38 minutes ago, SID.IS.SID.ME.IS.ME said: Counts as two pro years, so he’s expansion draft eligible. Even if he’s still not under contract, Seattle would be eligible to negotiate with him as part of the expansion draft’s free agent window, and if they reached an agreement, that contract would count as an expansion draft pick. Doesn’t really matter though, as I doubt Tryamkin will be the guy we lose in the expansion draft. We’ll have other players exposed that will be considered much “safer” picks for Seattle. I would bet my bottom dollar that if a Trymakin signing happens... Tanev will be moved. It's far more likely Edler, and or Benn and Stecher will be exposed for the expansion draft. .. Ether way you look at this it's a upgrade on our Blueline.... Trymakin is better than Ben and Stecher In my opinion and is more youthful and probably cheaper than Edler. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phat Fingers Posted September 24, 2019 Share Posted September 24, 2019 4 hours ago, SID.IS.SID.ME.IS.ME said: Counts as two pro years, so he’s expansion draft eligible. Even if he’s still not under contract, Seattle would be eligible to negotiate with him as part of the expansion draft’s free agent window, and if they reached an agreement, that contract would count as an expansion draft pick. Doesn’t really matter though, as I doubt Tryamkin will be the guy we lose in the expansion draft. We’ll have other players exposed that will be considered much “safer” picks for Seattle. If he isn't under contract, would he not be an RFA, or would that status be past by then? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phat Fingers Posted September 24, 2019 Share Posted September 24, 2019 4 hours ago, Captain Canuck #12 said: We might have safer picks available, but in an expansion draft Seattle may well go for a player with greater upside-- that is, go for the homerun with Tryamkin. Also to start a huge rivalry with us off the bat, while showing up with their own giant. I would think that if he is under contract with us, then he would be protected due to that same reason. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.