Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

Nikita Tryamkin | D


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, J-Dizzle said:

Why are people talking about Gaudette giving up his number?  This is Nikita Tryamkin we’re talking about not Patrick Kane.....

The only reason Guadette is wearing 88 is because Tanev is wearing Guadettes’ number..

Tanev won’t be back next season..   things will be what there supposed to be.

Edited by SilentSam
  • Hydration 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/10/2020 at 5:04 PM, SilentSam said:

 

Guadette was 8 in college..   Tryamkin wore 8 in his early years with Avtomobilist and at the 2014 WJC.

... and I’d say Tanev is the least likely to return of the 3. :ph34r:

 

... it’s Indian leg wrestling between Nik and Adam .

 

personaly I think Guadette gobbles up 8 before Tryamkin walks in the room.

More than likely, yes. But I was both surprised and impressed how he handled, and beat Connor Murphy, who was 3 inches taller and 40 lbs heavier. 

 

Gaudette's got a lot of fight in him, which bodes well for our team, as does adding Tryamkin!

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Hairy Kneel said:

Who was the last number tributed back to a incoming player, I remember we had one before?and what was the price paid? A gold watch? A car? Or whatever?

I feel like Sutter gave Eriksson #21.  Not 100% sure on that though.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, SilentSam said:

The only reason Guadette is wearing 88 is because Tanev is wearing Guadettes’ number..

Tanev won’t be back next season..   things will be what there supposed to be.

I think that would be a shame to let go of Tanev. He has grown with this team, had a great year and looks to be the ideal defence pairing and mentor for Hughes. Not to mention his willingness to sacrifice everything for the team, look at the man's teeth or lack thereof. I remember Tanev having a full set when he joined the team. I'm all for re-signing Tanman.

  • Like 1
  • Hydration 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Nostalgia said:

I think that would be a shame to let go of Tanev. He has grown with this team, had a great year and looks to be the ideal defence pairing and mentor for Hughes. Not to mention his willingness to sacrifice everything for the team, look at the man's teeth or lack thereof. I remember Tanev having a full set when he joined the team. I'm all for re-signing Tanman.

If we weren’t in cap hell (I think we’re currently in about the 3rd Circle of Benning’s Inferno ;)), I’d be all for re-signing Tanev. Unfortunately, we’re probably gonna need to save some money somewhere, and the right side D might be the place.
 

Stecher should be at least a couple million bucks cheaper than Tanev, and he can hold down a top-4 role. Myers, of course, isn’t going anywhere. Rafferty and Tryamkin (assuming he’s back and on a reasonable contract) can rotate in on the right side of the third pairing.

 

Certainly, that right side would look a lot better with Tanev on it, but I’m just not sure we can afford him.

Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, SilentSam said:

The only reason Guadette is wearing 88 is because Tanev is wearing Guadettes’ number..

Tanev won’t be back next season..   things will be what there supposed to be.

 

10 hours ago, Hairy Kneel said:

Who was the last number tributed back to a incoming player, I remember we had one before?and what was the price paid? A gold watch? A car? Or whatever?

It’s possible that Tanev won’t be back, but depending on how the NHL sets up its cap, he might be.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Hairy Kneel said:

What size contract would he sign for? NMC? NTC?

Tanev has certainly earned a NTC. This reminds me a lot of the decision to move on from Hamhuis, its a tough one. Tanev still has a ton of value but can we afford to keep him long term? I still think it might be Stecher thats on the bubble and is a casualty of the cap which is a shame since he plays with everything he's got. 

  • Hydration 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Ray_Cathode said:

 

It’s possible that Tanev won’t be back, but depending on how the NHL sets up its cap, he might be.

If they don’t do something to alleviate the problems, almost every UFA is going to be signing for $1 million or less because there isn’t enough money in the system to pay them.

Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, BarnBurner said:

More than likely, yes. But I was both surprised and impressed how he handled, and beat Connor Murphy, who was 3 inches taller and 40 lbs heavier. 

 

Gaudette's got a lot of fight in him, which bodes well for our team, as does adding Tryamkin!

Absolutely love the way AG has been getting better with us..  that was/ is a fantastic season for him..  inspires trust in a Coach to utilize him in other areas and assignments, and to trust other young men ( eg.MacEwan) in their growth.  I was pleasantly surprised with his “go” moment with Murphy. really hope all of our Utica/ Canuck Team members take their training to a new level on this unfortunate hiatus from “the game”..

it is training that defines your career in sports ask a player like Z Chara, or S Doan.. 

and it’s that physical discipline that create the mental edge to look straight ahead to your goals.

If, and or when Tryamkin arrives I hope he becomes the best that he possibly can here..

there is so much potential in him.

  • Hydration 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Jimmy McGill said:

Tanev has certainly earned a NTC. This reminds me a lot of the decision to move on frrom Hamhuis, its a tough one. Tanev still has a ton of value but can we afford to keep him long term? I still think it might be Stecher thats on the bubble and is a casualty of the cap which is a shame since he plays with everything he's got. 

Yes I agree i is a very tough decision between resigning Tanev and/or Stech.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, SID.IS.SID.ME.IS.ME said:

If we weren’t in cap hell (I think we’re currently in about the 3rd Circle of Benning’s Inferno ;)), I’d be all for re-signing Tanev. Unfortunately, we’re probably gonna need to save some money somewhere, and the right side D might be the place.
 

Stecher should be at least a couple million bucks cheaper than Tanev, and he can hold down a top-4 role. Myers, of course, isn’t going anywhere. Rafferty and Tryamkin (assuming he’s back and on a reasonable contract) can rotate in on the right side of the third pairing.

 

Certainly, that right side would look a lot better with Tanev on it, but I’m just not sure we can afford him.

If Stecher is "holding down" a top 4 role I am not very confident in the Canucks top 4 - especially if they have serious playoff aspirations.  He is at best a bottom pairing D on a good D corp.  I like Stecher but Stecher in the top 4 is not good for the Canucks prospects of being a serious playoff contender in my opinion.

Edited by Borvat
  • Like 1
  • Hydration 2
  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

We're getting so close to Tryamkin being free of his KHL contract. Exciting times. It does feel like now that the next Canucks' game played will have him in the line-up. 

There are so many exciting pieces to this team, and so much potential. Whenever things do get going again, this is such a fun team to watch now.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Tryamkin checks the right boxes for our D. √√ Thus shortening the shopping list for JB. And more importantly, shortening the adjustments needed for the coaching staff. All the big forwards who give us trouble, St Louis, Draistle, or the Jets, throw Tryamkin out there to stimey them. (With Myers or Rathbone or a hometown discount Stecher? maybe). He'll clear them out of the crease. Maybe spend the Tanev money on another big good skating D man. UFA or trade. I feel the chemistry of our make up will be getting better balanced ie size and skill, snarl and skill :canucks: Overall its one less thing to worry about.

  • Hydration 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, Hairy Kneel said:

Tryamkin checks the right boxes for our D. √√ Thus shortening the shopping list for JB. And more importantly, shortening the adjustments needed for the coaching staff. All the big forwards who give us trouble, St Louis, Draistle, or the Jets, throw Tryamkin out there to stimey them. (With Myers or Rathbone or a hometown discount Stecher? maybe). He'll clear them out of the crease. Maybe spend the Tanev money on another big good skating D man. UFA or trade. I feel the chemistry of our make up will be getting better balanced ie size and skill, snarl and skill :canucks: Overall its one less thing to worry about.

If St.Louis resigns Pietrangelo. I want us to go after Parayko. We compliance buyout Eriksson. Let Tanev walk. Find a suitor at with maybe 50% retention on Baertschi. Find a Suitor for Sutts. Re-sign Marky, Toffoli. Trade for Parayko. Use Stech in a package for Parayko. 

 

Miller - Pete - Toffoli/Boeser 

Pearson - Bo - Boeser/Toffoli

Ferland - Gauds - Virtanen 

Roussel - Beagle - MacEwen

ex. Motte, ? 

 

Hughes - Parayko 

Edler - Rafferty 

Tryamkin - Myers

 

Marky 

Demko

  • Like 1
  • Hydration 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, KKnight said:

If St.Louis resigns Pietrangelo. I want us to go after Parayko. We compliance buyout Eriksson. Let Tanev walk. Find a suitor at with maybe 50% retention on Baertschi. Find a Suitor for Sutts. Re-sign Marky, Toffoli. Trade for Parayko. Use Stech in a package for Parayko. 

 

Miller - Pete - Toffoli/Boeser 

Pearson - Bo - Boeser/Toffoli

Ferland - Gauds - Virtanen 

Roussel - Beagle - MacEwen

ex. Motte, ? 

 

Hughes - Parayko 

Edler - Rafferty 

Tryamkin - Myers

 

Marky 

Demko

 Demko wins 25 games as a back up and gets us a 1st  and  2nd plus prospect, Ferland , gets  maybe 30-40 games and then back on LITR. $ saves some cap.

Gone are: Tanev, Stech,LE, Baer, and Sutter. (and release/demote Schaller) and Lievo kept as our extra forward.

Fantenburgh as a low cost 7th Dman

 

*It's going to be impossible to get Pieterangelo, and tough to get Parayko, but I'd like the Surrey boy Dillon. He's tough. And probably would sign to be close to home.

 

 

Edited by Hairy Kneel
  • Hydration 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...