Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

Nikita Tryamkin | D


Drouin

Recommended Posts

43 minutes ago, IjustNEEDaTROYgamble said:

Tryamkin isn't signing with Vancouver, wasn't he complaining about his contract when he did play here and add that with Canuck's cap crunch it doesn't look good. 

You just invented a new nickname for Tryamkin: Cap’n Crunch.

  • Haha 2
  • Vintage 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, IjustNEEDaTROYgamble said:

Tryamkin isn't signing with Vancouver, wasn't he complaining about his contract when he did play here and add that with Canuck's cap crunch it doesn't look good. 

Completely irrelevant post, he didn’t complain about contract, he complained about how he was deployed on the ice.

 

We have more than enough cap space to sign him.

  • Cheers 2
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, VegasCanuck said:

Completely irrelevant post, he didn’t complain about contract, he complained about how he was deployed on the ice.

 

We have more than enough cap space to sign him.

Sorry he was complaining about his playing time not his contract.

yeah the Canucks wouldn't be in salary cap trouble if they didn't give Pearson $3 million+ cap hit and they still need to sign 4 defensemen and most of the bottom 6 with under $20 million and at least $15 million is going to Hughes and Petey. 

Canucks could have waited until the offseason for teams wanting to trade their 4th or 5th defensemen or bottom 6 centre for draft picks instead of losing them for nothing in the expansion draft. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, IjustNEEDaTROYgamble said:

Sorry he was complaining about his playing time not his contract.

yeah the Canucks wouldn't be in salary cap trouble if they didn't give Pearson $3 million+ cap hit and they still need to sign 4 defensemen and most of the bottom 6 with under $20 million and at least $15 million is going to Hughes and Petey. 

Canucks could have waited until the offseason for teams wanting to trade their 4th or 5th defensemen or bottom 6 centre for draft picks instead of losing them for nothing in the expansion draft. 

 

We have 21 mill in cap space for next season - which is tight especially with bonuses etc, however the likelihood is that ferland and potentially beagle will be on LTIR allowing us an overspend of 6.5 mill which is a significant chunk. 
 

if both beagle and ferland play then yes it will be difficult but it’s not a situation that is a crisis. 

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, UKNuck96 said:

We have 21 mill in cap space for next season - which is tight especially with bonuses etc, however the likelihood is that ferland and potentially beagle will be on LTIR allowing us an overspend of 6.5 mill which is a significant chunk. 
 

if both beagle and ferland play then yes it will be difficult but it’s not a situation that is a crisis. 

Also we are going to lose someone in the expansion draft so that should be a couple million

  • Cheers 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Hamhuis Hip Check said:

Also we are going to lose someone in the expansion draft so that should be a couple million

Yep that as well. It seems like most of the cap crisis people seem to take the total amount, don’t account for the draft, or LTIR but at the same time require us to have a Ferland/Beagle replacement on the roster without making the LTIR allowances. 

  • Cheers 3
  • Vintage 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...